“Man must evolve for all human conflict, a method,
which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation.
The foundation of such a method is love. I believe
that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality.”
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
“Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor
imagination, nor both together, go to the making of a genius.
Love,
love, love, that is the soul of Genius.”
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
“James
Roswell Quinn is Omni-Effective. He gets you to think, act, and change your
life, and make it instantly better.”
Mark Victor Hansen – Co-Creator, Chicken Soup For The Soul
“The Love-Based Leader is a real WINNER!
The great real-life stories make it a page-turner reference tool for joyful
living! Quinn is bringing LOVE to a stressed-out world. TERRIFIC!”
Ed Foreman – U. S. Congressman (Texas
and New Mexico). The first person
elected to the U.S. Congress from two different states in 100 years.
"Learning
to lead should be the focus for every successful business person. The ideas and
examples in The Love-Based Leader
provide a thoughtful approach on how to skillfully navigate an organization in
the 21st century."
Dr. Nido Qubein – President, High Point University Chairman, Great Harvest Bread President, National
Speakers Association
“Disney
rarely brings in outside speakers and trainers. I am glad we decided to have
Quinn run his Love-Based Leader
workshop. Not only did everyone love the presentation, there have been
noticeable changes in how people are solving problems. This was valuable.”
Joe Ranft – Walt Disney Feature Animation,
Pixar, and other studios. CREDITS: Finding Nemo, Cars, Toy Story, A
Bugs Life, Beauty & The Beast, The Lion King, The Little
Mermaid, The Incredibles, Monsters Inc., and more.
“Today’s
workplace poses challenging situations. Quinn’s message on Love-Based Leadership, and recognizing the positive attributes
within each of us, was inspiring and
will contribute to a more balanced and constructive approach in the management
of people and projects.”
Jean-Pierre St-Amand –
President, Real Property Institute of Canada
“I have
spoken to hundreds of Fortune 500 Companies. James Roswell Quinn is genuine,
engaging, relevant and compassionate. He brings 100 years of wisdom and
experience to the table. Quinn is a pro...a jaw dropper."
Brian Holloway – Vice-President of the NFL Player’s
Association Team Captain of the New England
Patriots 1985 Super Bowl Team
“Clear,
powerful, memorable and inspirational. The
Love-Based Leader delivers insightful ideas and provides the action steps
to put them to work. If you want to take your life and your business to the
next level, this book is your launching pad for extraordinary results.
Fantastic!”
Rich Fettke – Author of the best selling book, Extreme Success
Copyright
© 2011 Quinn Incorporated
All
rights reserved
Printed
in the United States of America
No
portion of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner
whatsoever without written
permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical
articles and reviews.
One Quest Publishing
1090
Winborne Rd
Davis, IL
61019-9756 USA
First Edition
ISBN-10:
1451556445
ISBN-13: 978-1451556445
_____________________________________________
Foreword
by Steven Sieden, Author
Buckminster Fuller’s Universe, His Life and Work
Editing
and Cover Design by Brandi Jasmine
Illustrations and Cover Photo by Peter
Fromme-Douglas
Creating
Success By
Overcoming
Fear-Based Living
James
Roswell Quinn
Qne Quest
Publishing
CONTENTS
FOREWORD: Buckminster Fuller: The Trimtab Principle |
7 |
Steven Sieden –
author, Buckminster Fuller’s Universe |
|
INTRODUCTION:The Leadership Evolution |
11 |
PART I – THE PROBLEM |
|
Fear-Based
Living |
|
CHAPTER 1: The Four Fear-Based Reactions |
19 |
Friendly Fred |
|
Feelings |
|
Emotions |
|
The Green Beret |
|
Fear of Failure |
|
Denial of Fear |
|
The Four Fear-Based Reactions |
|
The FIGHT Fear-Based Reaction |
|
The FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction |
|
The FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction |
|
The FACADE Fear-Based Reaction |
|
EXTREME Fear-Based Reactions |
|
SECONDARY Fear-Based Reactions |
|
Position Power |
|
EXERCISE #1 – Your Fear-Based Reactions |
|
CHAPTER 2: Fear is NOT the Problem |
45 |
George’s Story |
|
Resentment |
|
Resistance
Revenge
Pre-Actions and Survival Programs
The Sand Wasp
Non-Survival Programs
The Three Levels of Negative Circumstances
The Reactive Cycle
Overcoming Fear-Based Reactions
EXERCISE #2 – Your Non-Survival Programs
2
PART II –
THE SOLUTION
Love-Based Leadership
CHAPTER 3:Who Wants to WORK on a Relationship? |
71 |
Roberta Rockefeller and Me
Relating
“I Haven’t
Spoken To My Mother in 20 Years”
Giving Unconditionally
EXERCISE #3 - The Highest Blessing
The Man and The Wood Stove
Captain Dan and Laura
The Widow
EXERCISE #4 - Choosing To Give
CHAPTER 4:Love-Based Leadership? In Business? |
93 |
Pro-Act
The Restaurant Manager
The Win-Win Principle
The Business World is Changing
Creating Consensus
The Distributor
Guidelines for Creating Consensus
“Well Days” at the Warehouse
EXERCISE #5 - Creating Consensus
CHAPTER 5:Our One Quest is Peace |
109 |
The Dachau Survivor
Forgiveness
Their Daughter Was Murdered
Courage
Daniel
The Mirror Concept
LIVING Fear-Based or LEADING Love-Based
Two Flowers
The Penalty of Leadership
3
PART III –
THE METHOD
Four E’s of Excellence
CHAPTER 6:ETHICS - The Alternative to FACADE |
127 |
“Sarge”
ETHICS
The Problem: The FACADE Fear-Based Reaction
The Solution: Add ETHICS
The Tool: Creating Desired Results
The 7 Guidelines for Creating Desired Results The
Fired Banker
EXERCISE #6 - Creating Desired Results
CHAPTER
7: ENTHUSIASM - The Alternative to FREEZE 143
An “Autistic” Adult
ENTHUSIASM
The Problem: The FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction
The Solution: Add ENTHUSIASM
The Tool: Planned Spontaneity
EXERCISE #7 - Plan Something Spontaneous
CHAPTER
8: EVALUATION – The Alternative to FLIGHT 157
The Real Estate Salesman
EVALUATION
The Problem: The FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction
The Solution: Add EVALUATION
The Tool: Centering
EXERCISE #8 - Centering
CHAPTER 9:EMPATHY - The Alternative to FIGHT |
169 |
EMPATHY
The Problem: The FIGHT Fear-Based Reaction
The Solution: Add EMPATHY
The New Car Dealer
The Tool: The Trust Formula
Using the Trust Formula
The Crisis Negotiator
Using the Trust Formula on Yourself
EXERCISE #9 - Creating Trust
4
CHAPTER 10: The Four Personality Styles |
185 |
The Problem With Learning Your Own Style
The Problem With Categorizing The Styles of Others
The Unique Advantage of “Four E’s of Excellence”
The Love-Based Leader TARGET ZONE
Summary – Using “Four E’s of Excellence” on
Yourself
EXERCISE #10 – Your Love-Based Leadership Qualities
But What if “Four E’s of Excellence” Does Not Work?
Summary – Using “Four E’s of Excellence” on OTHERS
The Global Love-Based Leader
A Sense of Urgency
The Love-Based Leadership BOOM
James Roswell Quinn |
202 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
204 |
APPENDIX: Variations of the “Four Personality
Styles” |
206 |
WORLDWIDE PRAISE |
227 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
232 |
A Request for Stories of Love-Based Leadership |
234 |
Contact The Author |
235 |
GET OVER YOURSELF |
237 |
5
Buckminster Fuller
Businessman,
statesman, inventor, futurist,
architect
of the geodesic dome,
and the man who coined the term “Spaceship Earth”.
“Bucky”
has one of the longest listings in the history of
Who’s Who
in America.
6
FOREWORD
BUCKMINSTER
FULLER
The Trimtab Principle
by Steven Sieden, author
Buckminster Fuller’s Universe: His Life and Work
We find ourselves in the last stages of a great cosmic final examination.
As Buckminster Fuller wrote in 1983, “The
cosmic question has been asked. Are humans
worthwhile to Universe?”
“Bucky”
said our exam could be boiled down to one simple question, “Am I choosing love or fear?”
He recognized while this choice of love over fear is actually quite logical today; it was not rational for our
ancestors.
In the
1930’s, Fuller was the first person to take a thorough accounting of all Earth’s
resources. He determined that we were continually doing “more with less”. Fuller
surmised that our “more with lessing”
would eventually create a world in
which there was enough for everyone, and he sought to determine when that would
take place.
“Humanity is taking its final examination. We have
come to an extraordinary moment when it doesn’t have to be you or me anymore.
There is enough for all.”
Buckminster Fuller
His
calculations led him to predict that the shift would occur in 1976. It has now
been proven that, in 1976, humankind became so efficient that we could feed
everyone on Earth. That statistic also applies to all other resources including
non-physical ones such as love.
7
There is
enough of everything, but most of us continue to react from the mindset of
pre-1976 when we had to fight for “our share” and to make sure that our family
and friends had what they needed. We did this out of fear, which was valid
prior to the 1976 transition. Now, more than ever, we need to recognize that
there is enough for everyone and begin to contribute and share wholeheartedly.
In other words, we need to act out of love rather than fear.
The
question then becomes, how does one individual accomplish this? How can we each
manifest what makes the most difference, and give our individual gifts in the
most effective manner possible?
This
seems like a difficult challenge until we consider all that was accomplished by
the great women and men who lived in an era where there really was not enough
to go around. Those brave individuals gave of themselves in ways we can only
describe as heroic, even though their peers often perceived them as unstable.
These
wise ancestors often used a strategy we too can employ. They looked to see
where they could make the most difference with the least effort, thereby
allowing them to do much more with very little. Bucky Fuller compared this
behavior to that of a ship’s trimtab.
“A large ship goes by, and then comes the rudder.
On the edge of the rudder is a miniature rudder
called a trimtab.
Moving the trimtab builds a low pressure which turns the rudder that
steers the gigantic ship with almost no effort.
One individual can be a trimtab, making a major
difference.”
Buckminster Fuller
Bucky’s tombstone reads, “Call Me Trimtab”
James
Roswell Quinn has been a trimtab with much of his life. Rather than devoting
the majority of his time to one-on-one consultation, he shares his talents and
insights with groups of people. I have personally utilized many of the
techniques he teaches. Quinn has a great deal to offer at this critical
juncture in the evolution of humankind.
The
trimtab principle is available to each of us as well. We may not be the people
who stand in front of a room or write a book, but we have a responsibility to
uncover our unique talents and gifts, and share them with the world in an
effective manner.
Within
Bucky’s, “World that works for everyone”,
that has emerged since 1976, we are all vital to the process of making a global
shift by becoming accountable for leading from a position of love in all
aspects of our lives. We
8
need more people who reflect this
perspective of love, rather than the fear that has dominated our society since
the dawn of recorded history. We need average individuals, as many leaders have
described themselves, to step forward into their true calling.
James
Roswell Quinn has been on the leading edge of supporting this emerging reality
and the transformation that it offers to every crew member aboard Spaceship
Earth. With this book, he shares a wealth of information gained from teaching
hundreds of seminars and workshops.
The Love-Based Leader is a great toolbox for those seeking to make a positive difference in the world. Many
have embarked on the journey toward becoming what Quinn describes as a “love-based
leader”. It may not always be smooth sailing, but I can assure you it is the
only way our children and their children will survive and prosper.
“Whether humanity is to continue and
comprehensively prosper on Spaceship Earth depends entirely on the integrity of
the human individuals, and not on the political and economic systems.”
Buckminster Fuller
I invite
you to choose the path of love-based leadership, and become a trimtab on behalf
of all humankind. Each of us can make a difference. We can contribute our gifts
to others and, in the process, receive the rewards of being gifted with the
talents of others.
Making
the decision to be a love-based leader does not require sacrifice. The path of
love is a path of joy. It promotes a sense of well being for all who choose it.
Choosing love brings forth the best in each of us, and calls us to greater
challenges and possibilities. Choosing love opens doorways that we did not know
existed and allows for the magic called synergy to blossom in our lives and in
the lives of those we touch.
In
choosing to be a love-based leader, each of us helps to lay the foundation for
a new civilization in which we will manifest the often-imagined “Heaven on
Earth”. That possibility is here now. It lies within each of us to be a
trimtab, and thus make a major difference. Turn the pages of this book gently,
and you will surely find clues to your personal journey.
I wish for you to live your dreams.
Steven Sieden
Author, Buckminster Fuller’s Universe: His Life and Work
9
The Evolution of Leadership
Leadership
based on Position-Power is history.
It is time to stop fighting against what you do NOT want, and to start
fighting for what you DO want.
There is a difference.
10
INTRODUCTION
The
Leadership Evolution
We are in the midst of an
evolution in leadership. Throughout history, unless you were
born into power or wealth, leadership was not an option. With rare exceptions,
the only choice for most people was to live fear-based or die. The only choice
for leaders was to lead fear-based or lose.
Today,
people have a different choice. They can continue to choose to live fear-based
lives, and to follow fear-based leaders. Or, they can instead choose to be
love-based leaders.
The
Love-Based Leader explains
the fundamental concepts of this evolution. More importantly, it provides
practical techniques for the development of love-based leadership as your
vehicle for the creation of desired results ... personally, professionally, and
globally.
For me,
the quest to understand and teach the concepts and techniques of love-based
leadership began in Chicago in 1975. That was the summer I was finally talked
into attending my parent’s LifeStream personal growth seminar. Please take a
journey with me back in time.
1975
I am sitting in the audience,
waiting for the seminar to begin. About 45 people are seated in typical seminar
chairs, packed closely together, with an aisle down the center. I am sitting
three rows back, on the left side of the room, facing front. There are windows
to the right and rear of the room, a solid wall in front, and doors to the
left. In the front of the room there is an easel stand with a large pad of
paper.
Most of
the people around me are chatting. I am sitting quietly by myself and wondering
why I have come. My parents, who own and present this seminar, have been trying
to get me here for about two years.
11
I am
hoping this finally gets them off my back. In four days, we won’t have to talk
about it anymore. They will no longer be able to tell me that I am missing
something special. Not only that, I will soon be able to dismiss this
ridiculous concept of personal growth that they keep preaching to me. I am
already looking for ways to shoot holes in the idea.
I
seriously doubt that I will experience anything special, and in fact, am
sitting here wondering why all of these people have paid money to my parents
for this four-day, so-called, self-improvement seminar. I am sarcastically
thinking, “Did my parents withhold all of
the good stuff until I paid a tuition?” My thoughts are judgmental and resistant.
Finally,
my father enters the room and begins the seminar by welcoming us all, and
challenging us to be responsible for creating our own value from the weekend. “The value won’t come from what you take
from this seminar,” he tells us, “It
will come from what you are prepared to give.”
I am
thinking, “So, what is he going to be
doing if we have to create the value?”
I would really rather not be here.
Then, my
father looks at us and says something that changes my life. He points to the
center of the audience and says,
“You are
only as big as the smallest thing it takes to upset you.”
For some
reason, that really upsets me. After all, I reason, it is not my fault if
someone else is being mean or stupid. Then it occurs to me that in my lifetime,
there have been many tiny little things that have upset me. All of a sudden I
am thinking, “What if my father is right?
And, if he is right, if all it takes to upset me is for someone to make a stupid statement, then I must be pretty small
indeed.”
I do not
like having that thought, but I cannot get it out of my mind. At that moment I
realize for the bulk of my life, if someone treated me badly I resented them –
and if someone treated me nicely I liked them. Basically, my life had been
controlled by how the people around me had been treating me. I wonder, could
this explain why I am filled with so many insecurities despite all of my
blessings?
I decide
to discover how I can become bigger than the little things that have hurt my
feelings and made me feel angry or insecure. Heck, I am tired of spending my
life worrying about what everyone else is thinking anyway.
I am
suddenly aware that my father is still speaking. He says, “The bottom line is you have
a choice. You can choose to live in fear and justify it, or you can choose to
take responsibility for your own life and to live in love. By the end of this
weekend you will know how to make that choice.” I make a conscious choice to take him up on the challenge.
12
Today
That was the beginning of my
quest to become a love-based leader, even though my parents did not use that
terminology. It has thus far led to successes far beyond my dreams.
Had I
realized where this quest was going to take me, I would have certainly
hesitated. My low self worth would never have allowed for me to envision
speaking in nine countries, and with companies such as Walt Disney Feature
Animation – much less to share the speaker’s platform with world-class leaders
such as Mark Victor Hansen, Jim Rohn, Les Brown, Brian Holloway, Congressman Ed
Foreman, and others. No, those would have been impossible dreams for me.
If you
are ready to become a love-based leader, then prepare now for the creation of
successes bigger than you have ever dreamed. Not just bigger than what you have
achieved, but bigger than what you have dreamed.
It has been said that dreams are what give our
lives value.
But, it is how we live that determines if our
dreams have value.
Throughout
history, humans have consistently resisted change. For example, we have known
for hundreds of years that there is no truth what-so-ever to the terms “sunrise”
and “sunset” ... the Sun neither rises nor sets. It just appears to do so as
the Earth spins on its axis. Even though this fact is common knowledge, these
terms are still in general usage.
Change is
now occurring so rapidly that for the first time in history, you can literally
stand on a street corner and observe change taking place. Many of these changes
are being resisted, to be sure. But some are being embraced.
We have
seen the Internet, personal computers, cell-phones, PDAs, HD television, and
other technological wonders achieve global market penetration and acceptance.
This has occurred far more rapidly than anyone could have imagined just a few
years ago, and the pace of change is accelerating.
Rapid
changes are not just occurring in technology. In 1900, there were only 15
democracies in the world and only two in Europe. Today there are over 120 democracies
in the world and only two nations in Europe are not democracies (and one of
them is Vatican City).
The result of all of this change
is a volatile and unpredictable world. Intimate relationships often seem to
cause more frustration than fulfillment. Many families are in turmoil. A large
number of corporations are floundering or failing. The United States has been
involved in two wars. Fears of a global recession abound.
While
people have almost always been threatened on several different fronts, the
evolution of leadership is changing how people are dealing with these
challenges. It is becoming increasingly unacceptable, for example, to hate the “enemy”
simply because someone in power thinks we should.
13
Traditional
“position-power” leadership has always been fear-based. By utilizing their
positions of authority, husbands have controlled their wives, parents have
controlled their children, bosses have controlled their employees, and
governments have controlled their citizens. Position-power has been effective
because most people have lived fear-based lives.
Today
however, those relying on position-power are becoming increasingly frustrated
because the fear-based strategies and behaviors of the past are rapidly losing
effectiveness. In fact, it is becoming apparent that efforts to control others
are facing more and more resistance ... personally, professionally, and
globally.
Buckminster
Fuller discovered that everything changed in 1976, when fear-based living
shifted from being the solution to being the problem (see the “Foreword”
beginning on page 7). Today, more people than ever are longing to stop living
fear-based lives. The Love-Based Leader
will show them the way.
Hard
work, challenges, and threats are not new for people.
What is
new is the chance for them to be leaders ...
if they choose to lead with love.
Since
1979, the concepts and techniques in The
Love-Based Leader have been refined in over 1,500 personal and professional
development seminars and keynote addresses in the USA, UK, Canada, Mexico,
Panama, Dominican Republic, Thailand, New Zealand, Bahamas, and Dubai. They
have helped tens of thousands of people to overcome everything from minor
irritations to unimaginable tragedies. Many of their stories are included in
this book in order to assist you in solving your own personal and professional
challenges.
The Love-Based Leader is your handbook for the creation of successes with your life, not just in your life. If
this stirs something in you, and you want to understand what this truly means
and how to do it, then you have already begun your journey.
Regardless
of your circumstances and how you feel about them, you have a choice. You can
live fear-based or you can lead love-based. The world has enough people living
fear-based. We need love-based leaders and we need them now.
Welcome to the quest,
“Ross”
James Roswell Quinn
My dream is of a joyous world where all people
treat themselves, all other people, and Earth with honor and respect.
14
For my children.
I love
you QuinnTillions
15
Fear-Based
Living:
The Inevitable Result of Excessive Fear-Based Reactions to Real or
Perceived Threats
16
17
You do
not need your mind to react.
An amoeba
knows how to do that.
Stimulus
… Response … Stimulus … Response
You only
need ONE cell to react.
You need your mind to be able to choose NOT to
react.
18
CHAPTER 1
The Four
Fear-Based Reactions
I was one
of the lucky ones. I grew up in a family that overflowed with love. As a result I witnessed many
examples of love-based leadership, long before I coined the term.
My
earliest and strongest memory of the power of love-based leadership was an
event that had a profound impact on both my father and me. It happened in 1966,
when we were living in Thousand Oaks, California.
“Love thy neighbor as thyself.”
Leviticus 19:18
Based on how most people love themselves,
our neighbors are in serious trouble.
Friendly
Fred
My parents, James and Janet
Quinn, were successful business owners. My father was president of the Merchant’s
Association, president of the Thousand Oaks Chamber of Commerce, and was on the
Board of Directors of California Lutheran College. My mother was president of
one of the largest Republican women’s clubs in America. They also belonged to
many other business, recreational, civic, and charitable organizations.
19
The
natural consequence of their activities and friendships was a steady stream of
people through our home. Add three teenagers (Nancy, Gary, and myself) plus our
friends, and you can see why our house was referred to as the Quinn “Circus”.
While
ours was one of the most visited houses in town, I do not recall anyone ever visiting
next door. Our neighbor, Fred, was the most unfriendly man I had ever known.
Ironically though, he worked in public relations for a large airline company.
Every
morning his garage door would open and Fred would leave for work. Every evening
it would swallow him up. Fred so desired isolation he created a two-fence
barrier between himself and his five backyard neighbors. Apparently, Fred did
not feel just one fence was enough, because he actually built a second fence
about one foot inside of the original. We jokingly nicknamed him “Friendly Fred”.
Friendly
Fred’s one love (hopefully in addition to his wife) was his beautiful dichondra
lawn. Dichondra lawns are always green and never need mowing, but they do
require lots of sun and water. While Southern California is blessed with lots
of sun, there is not too much rain. To compensate, Friendly Fred watered his
precious dichondra lawn at least once a day. The result was squishy ground … so
squishy you would leave an impression if you stepped on his lawn.
During
the week, the only times we saw Friendly Fred was when he came outside to water
his lawn. But on weekends, when we played football in the street or were riding
our bikes on the sidewalk, Fred would come out to the curb to check for mail in
his mailbox several times an hour. A dirty stare or some yelling by Friendly
Fred always accompanied these little walks. He was so intimidating that if a
ball or Frisbee landed in his back yard, nobody would ever knock on his door to
get it back.
He was
obviously consumed with protecting his property. If you have ever seen how
teenagers can rebel against anyone who tries to enforce authority, then you
know his fears were valid. In fact, we usually got even with him by leaving
footprints and tire impressions on his beloved lawn.
Friendly Fred also resented anyone who parked in front of his house
because they would leave impressions when they stepped on his lawn while going
to and from their cars.
It was
this resentment over what to me was an
‘insignificant’
problem, that led to one of my greatest life lessons.
Since it
was not always possible to find a parking space in front of the Quinn Circus,
occasionally one of our visitors would park in front of Friendly Fred’s home.
Fred would immediately rush out and yell at them. We figured he must sit by his
window just waiting for his chance to bolt outside and explode on any
unsuspecting victim.
20
Friendly
Fred might have been unfriendly, but he wasn’t stupid. One day he bought a Rain-Bird
sprinkler which sprayed water not only onto his lawn, but way out into the
street. “Now,” he must have thought, “nobody will park here.”
This
worked like a charm, and nobody parked in front of Friendly Fred’s house when
he was watering. However, since he could not water his lawn all of the time,
those people who parked there when the sprinkler was off would still get to
experience his hostility.
One time,
Friendly Fred chose to water his lawn after several cars had already parked in
front of his house. When my brother and I noticed what he was doing, we started
to get angry, but my father reminded us of one of his favorite sayings:
“When
life gives you lemons, make lemonade.”
So,
instead of getting angry, we decided to have a little fun at Friendly Fred’s
expense. Gary and I got chamois cloths, and proceeded to wash our friends’ cars
with Friendly Fred’s water.
Friendly
Fred failed to see the humor in this, and he came out and yelled at us. We
simply laughed at him to rub salt in his wounds. This is basically how we lived
for several years.
Then one
day my parents were throwing a large party. They did not want trouble from
Friendly Fred, so the invitations clearly warned everyone not to park in front
of his house. Guests parked in front of other people’s houses up and down the
street. We were certain we would have a pleasant afternoon without having to
deal with Friendly Fred.
It was a
typical California summer day, hot and sunny. Most of the people were in the
back yard cooking, eating and drinking. Some people were playing croquet and
ping-pong while others were inside preparing food or shooting pool. Everyone
was having a marvelous time.
Unfortunately,
my father’s good friend Bill was late for the party. Bill had just returned
from a trip and had spent the morning taking delivery of his dream car, a
Cadillac convertible destined to be a classic.
Bill was
so excited to show off his new car that he drove straight to our party without
checking his mail. He never read the invitation with the parking warning, so he
pulled his car into the only remaining space; smack in front of Friendly Fred’s
house.
Bill
joined the party and played the “Guess
what I did today” game with us. After about an hour he told us about his
new car, and we all hurried out front to see it.
To our
collective horror we saw his beautiful Cadillac convertible, with the top down,
being soaked by Friendly Fred’s sprinkler. Apparently, just after Bill arrived,
Friendly Fred had decided it was a good time to water his lawn … and had been
spraying Bill’s new car with water for almost an hour.
My father
literally exploded. In my 17 years, I had never seen him this angry. He was so
furious he could not even talk. I honestly think you could have fried an egg on
his forehead.
21
Suddenly,
my father leapt over the little hedge separating our front yards, and ran
across Friendly Fred’s dichondra lawn kicking out big divots of the wet sod
with each step. When he got to the sprinkler, my father kicked it so hard that
instead of shooting water into Bill’s Cadillac, the spray was directed into
Friendly Fred’s open bedroom window. He also broke his own toe.
While
Friendly Fred yelled at us, we moved Bill’s car into our driveway to dry it
out. There was surprisingly little damage. This, however, did not cool down my
father. It did not help that Friendly Fred had called the police.
Friendly
Fred wanted my dad arrested for wrecking his lawn, breaking his sprinkler, and
soaking his drapes. Luckily, both officers knew my father so he was not
arrested. They got him to return to the party while they dealt with Friendly
Fred.
By now,
everyone knew about what Friendly Fred had done to Bill’s car, and about how my
father reacted. The party quickly lost its joyousness, and people soon
departed. My father ranted all night about how he was going to get even with
Friendly Fred.
The next
day my father could not work because of his anger. He decided to come home
early and make himself a drink. This is a man who never came home early, rarely
got angry, and never got drunk. Yet there he sat, drinking in our family room
with his anger increasing each minute.
About
5:30, Friendly Fred drove past our house and was swallowed into his garage. I
was worried my father might go next door and start a fight.
A few
minutes later, I saw Friendly Fred walking up our sidewalk. In all the years we
lived next door to each other, this was the first time he had come to our home.
This did not bode well.
Friendly
Fred rang the bell and my dad opened the door. I was certain a fight was about
to break out until I saw that Friendly Fred was crying. He looked at my dad and
said, “Jim, I just wanted to come over to
apologize for yesterday.”
My father was visibly confused. “Apologize?”
With
tears flowing, Friendly Fred continued, “…
and to thank you for the flowers.”
“Flowers?”
my dad asked, really confused
now.
Fred,
oblivious to my dad’s confusion, was holding a small card. He read from it out
loud.
Dear
Fred.
Isn’t it
silly for people to act this way?
We really
do love you.
Jim &
Jan
22
Fred was
actually sobbing as he read. When he finished, Fred handed the card to my
father. At that moment, my father read it to himself, “Dear Fred. Isn’t it silly
for people to act this way? We really do love you.”
My father
read and re-read the card, trying to figure out what was going on, until
suddenly I saw him smile. As I found out later, it was then that he realized
what had happened. In an attempt to solve the problems with our neighbor, my
mother had sent flowers and a nice card to Friendly Fred.
But there
was more. She had signed the card “Jim
& Jan”. My mother knew my father would probably object to this
love-based solution, and would have certainly refused to allow her to sign his
name, so she said nothing to him about “their” little gift.
Finally,
Friendly Fred said through his tears, “Thank
you Jim. I want you to know this is
the first time in my life anyone has sent me flowers, and I can’t tell you how
much I appreciated getting them. But I really came over to thank you for
something else."
At this
point, he took the card back from my father and read aloud again. “Isn’t it silly for people to act this way?
We really do love you.”
Practically
bawling now, Friendly Fred managed to continue: “I want you to know, Jim,
that except for my wife you are the only people in my life who have ever told
me that they love me.”
With
that, Friendly Fred broke down in sobs. My dad just held him in his arms, and
nobody said a word for several minutes.
Finally,
Fred went home, but the lesson was clear. Here we were, enjoying our “Circus”
and making fun of Friendly Fred, when the only thing he really needed from us,
was the one thing we had been unwilling to give to him … our love.
From that
day onward, whenever anyone asked my father how to handle a difficult person,
his response was always the same:
“Just
give them love.
Just give
them love.
Just give
them love.”
23
Feelings
The previous story shows how
badly things can turn when our lives are controlled by our feelings.
Thankfully, it also became an example of how such negativity can be turned
around with love.
Feelings
are internal signals that identify both positive and negative circumstances. While
good feelings can lead you to wonderful experiences, and to quality personal
and business relationships, bad feelings have value as well. You jerk your hand
out of a fire because you do not like the feeling of your hand burning, thus
preventing great damage to your hand. This is precisely why the feeling of pain
is so valuable.
Disaster
can result when feelings are misinterpreted. Feelings of pleasure can lead to
the trap of drug addiction. Fear of rejection has prevented many from entering
into beneficial relationships.
As such,
feelings are neither good nor bad, they simply exist. Examples of feelings
include hunger, irritation, joy, anger, pleasure, worry, serenity, nervousness,
exhilaration, anxiety, happiness, resentment, fear and longing.
“Einstein found two fundamental forces
motivating human beings ... fear and longing.”
Buckminster Fuller
There is
a constant battle between the feelings of fear and longing. Many people long
for success, but have an overwhelming fear of rejection, ridicule, success, or
failure. For these people there will always be excuses instead of results,
regardless of lofty goals or financial desperation.
Those
whose longing for success is more important than their fears will do whatever
is necessary, in spite of their fears. This creates at least the chance for
success.
Many
years ago, while selling advertising, I made a sale on a Friday afternoon. It
was my best week ever. I was ecstatic. I knew my wife and my boss would be
happy. I decided to reward myself by heading home a little early.
Then I
thought, “Why not make one more call?”
I turned the car around and saw a person whom I had been afraid would reject
me. I figured, “What have I got to lose?” It turned out to be the
single biggest sale of my career. His referrals made my next week even bigger.
Fear or
longing? One will always win. When you long for success, but succumb to your
fear of failure, you do not even make the attempt. But, when you overcome your
fear of rejection, because you are more motivated by your longing for success,
you at least make the attempt. Only then do you create the opportunity to learn
from a failure, and then do it again and again until you finally succeed.
24
Emotions
To most people emotions are synonymous with
feelings, but they are not. Feelings provide us with valuable information,
while emotions are the external evidence of those feelings. Examples of
emotions include laughter, tears, frowns, smiles, prejudice, kindness,
cowardice, courage, shyness, arrogance, forgiveness, vengeance, resistance,
hatred, and love.
In essence, emotions are how we
show the world how we are feeling. Obviously, we can choose to emote our true
feelings. Just as tears can be an honest expression of hurt, laughter can be an
accurate demonstration of joy.
Nevertheless, emotions do not
necessarily reflect or parallel our true feelings. For example, both tears and
laughter can be faked. What we choose to emote is influenced by our self-worth,
beliefs, desires, experiences, integrity, passions, and our current objectives.
Fear and
Resentment, as with all Feelings,
are
Natural Sensations.
Love and
Hate, as with all Emotions,
are
Decisions.
Imagine you have just witnessed
your child hit by a car—not killed, but pinned under the car in great pain and
terror. As you run to assist, you see an obviously drunk driver stumble out of
the car. Simultaneously, you would be experiencing feelings of fear for your
child, anger for the driver, and a longing for your child’s survival. You would
probably do one of two things:
1)
Because
of your feelings of fear and resentment, but in spite of or your longing for
your child to be all right, you could focus on the drunk. You could chose to
emote hate by attacking the drunk driver, getting hysterical, shutting-down, or
even running away.
2)
In spite
of your feelings of fear and resentment, but because of your longing for your
child to be all right, you could focus on the child. You could choose to emote
love by saying things such as, “I’m here”
or “You’re going to be OK.”
Even though you can obviously
emote love even when you have feelings of fear and resentment, you would
probably choose not to do so for the drunk driver (although some people may
choose to forgive and then give love later). We can choose to emote love, even
when we have been hurt. We can also choose to emote hate, even when we have not
been hurt.
25
The Green
Beret
Many years ago, there was a
police officer in my class who literally had no fears. Officer “Smith,” a
former Green Beret, was a member of his department’s S.W.A.T. team. He could
not relate to any fear-based discussions, except from the position of being
able to see how other people reacted to him because of their fears.
Officer
Smith told us of his dream to become a Secret Service Agent. In fact,
everything in his life had been geared to that one goal for as long as he could
remember.
Unfortunately,
his dream was destroyed by a single event. One night, while still in the army,
he got in a bar fight because someone whistled at his date. It turned into a “Rambo”
situation, with him ending up fighting the whole bar, and beating up several
men. After his arrest he found out that he had lost his security clearance, and
his dream was now gone. There was no chance he could ever become a Secret
Service Agent.
When he
finished telling us this story, I took a breath and said, “So basically, what you are
telling me is that you are a weakling. You have no power, and it’s probably a
good thing that you didn’t become a Secret Service Agent.”
I could
see his rage building as I continued, “Let
me get this straight. A guy did
something you didn’t like, so you had to make him pay for it. Let’s see now, he
spent an evening at the hospital, and you lost your dream. Who do you think
paid the higher price? Who really lost?”
“They hurt your feelings, your pride, and your ego
for a minute. By reacting with rage, you hurt yourself for a lifetime.”
His jaw
slackened and he just looked at me. I continued, “You lost. You were beaten by
sound waves. What a wimp.” I have never been the type of person to quit when I was ahead.
I was
slowly backing up at that point because I was pretty sure I would get a
reaction. But he just smiled and said, “I
understand. I think I’m getting it now. I’ve
arrested people who’ve thrown their lives away because someone else made them
mad. I always wondered how they could be so blind. Yet, I did exactly the same
thing.”
I smiled
and breathed a sigh of relief. He smiled again and said, “You are the first person who
has ever called me a name like that and walked away.” I was truly grateful he understood what I was
talking about. Had he attacked me, our fight would have been a joke. While he
probably knew dozens of ways of killing someone, I have never even been in a
fistfight … not even once.
26
Fear Of
Failure
Fear of failure can control your
life, especially when triggered by perceived threats. These fear-based
reactions must be overcome in order for you to create personal or professional
excellence.
There is,
for example, almost no real danger when rock climbing if you are climbing with
qualified individuals in accordance with generally recognized safety standards.
If you fall, your spotters and the equipment will keep you safe. Whether you
feel embarrassed or inadequate, you have a choice. You can come down, continue
climbing from where you fell, or try a different route.
On the
other hand, for many people fear of falling creates a perception of danger that
exceeds the possible good feelings they would get by successfully scaling a
rock face. In such cases, otherwise capable persons give up before they start
and do not give themselves a chance to experience this activity, much less
excel at it.
Similarly,
when a salesperson slips and falls, and fails to make a sale, there is rarely
unrecoverable damage. Rejection and frustration are simply part of the process.
A successful salesperson simply goes on to the next prospect, learning from the
experience.
However, for many people fear of
rejection creates a perception of danger that far exceeds the possible benefits
of successfully making a sale. Just as with fear of falling when rock climbing,
where otherwise capable persons give up before they start, they do not give
themselves a chance to achieve excellence in sales.
In sales,
rock climbing, or any endeavor where the perception of risk is grossly
inflated, achievable objectives are not even attempted. “Playing it safe”
guarantees failure. Ships in a harbor are safe, but it is not why ships were
built. Avoiding the risk of failure keeps us safe, but it is not why we were
born.
The main
reason people do not have what they want?
They are
too busy trying to prevent getting what they do not want.
Part of
the problem is that “fear of rejection” and “fear of falling” are rational
feelings. Rejection is painful and falling could be deadly. There is a certain
amount of wisdom involved in choosing behaviors that prevent you from trying
things that could end up in failure or death.
However,
the cost of playing it safe can be enormous when the danger is only perceived.
When you do not make a sales presentation because you hate being turned down,
it is fear of rejection that has guaranteed you will not earn a commission
today.
Thomas
Edison did not create the light bulb by trying to prevent darkness, and you
cannot create success by trying to prevent failure. You become successful by
taking calculated risks, failing, learning from your mistakes and giving it another
shot … not by playing it safe.
27
“I’ve missed more than 9000 shots in my career.
I’ve lost almost 300 games.
Twenty-six times, I’ve been trusted
to take the game-winning shot and missed.
I’ve failed over and over and over again in my
life,
and that is why I succeed.”
Michael
Jordan
The
answer is to develop the wisdom to identify perceived threats, and then to
create the courage and determination to overcome your fears. While you will
probably not succeed at everything you attempt, you will most certainly fail at
everything you do not attempt.
Failure
is NOT the problem.
“Fear of
Failure” is the problem.
The first
key to becoming a Love-Base Leader
is to
overcome your fears of PERCEIVED threats.
28
Denial of
Fear
While fears of perceived threats
must be overcome, fears of real threats must be addressed and dealt with. When
you deny fear, and fail to be careful when facing a genuine risk, you place
yourself in danger. When you behave without considering what might go wrong,
you behave as a child who spontaneously runs into the street after a ball;
disaster becomes a possibility.
“If I ever lose my fear completely, I’ll quit
climbing.”
My
rock-climbing instructor in Canada
When you
deny your fears, you eliminate an important source of information when making
decisions. You actually place yourself in harm’s way, and set yourself up for
fear-based reactions when things do go wrong. Denial represents the greatest
danger to “fearless” people.
The macho
guy, who does not see the risk of withholding his feelings, puts his fist
through a wall when his girlfriend leaves him. The arrogant teenager, who does
not appreciate the consequences of shoplifting, is mortified with the thought
of phoning her parents after she has been arrested. The self-centered CEO is
devastated when imprisoned for “cooking the books” for personal benefit. Many
people, who drive as if they are immortal, have ruined other people’s lives and
their own self-worth after recklessly hurting or killing someone in a car
accident.
While you
will probably not be able to successfully predict everything that can go wrong,
you will most certainly get clobbered by the disasters you deny or ignore.
Effective techniques include “Pre-Marital Counseling”, “Worst-Case Scenario
Planning”, and “Defensive Driving”.
Fear is
NOT the problem.
“Denial
of Fear” is the problem.
The
second key to becoming a Love-Base Leader
is to
address and deal with REAL threats.
29
The Four
Fear-Based Reactions
We are all looking for happier
and more fulfilled lives. Whether our desires are modest or spectacular, we
often go to extreme lengths to get what we want. While we are all hoping to get
lucky, we inherently know one thing ... our own actions have the primary impact
on our success or failure.
Yet
somehow, time after time, we self-sabotage. Sometimes we are blind to what we
are doing, and of course nothing changes. At other times, even though we are
fully aware we are acting in a counter-productive or even a destructive manner,
we just cannot stop ourselves. Either way, it is our habitual negative
behaviors that can make us each our own worst enemy.
Any such
pattern, whether conscious or unconscious, is based upon fear. It could be a
fear of getting something we do not want (such as rejection or physical pain),
or a fear of losing something we do want (such as a relationship or a job).
Either way, our own fear-based reactions are the only true barriers to our
personal growth and professional development.
You may
know of the “FIGHT or FLIGHT” survival theory, especially if you took a course
such as Psychology 101. This concept describes the two fear-based reactions
made by animals, or our ancient ancestors, who would attack or retreat when
faced with physical threats.
30
However,
these were not the only two fear-based reactions. There is a third form known
as the “FREEZE”. Just as a deer freezes when suddenly caught in the headlights
of a car, humans have learned to protect themselves by not moving, playing
dead, or hiding in a cave.
Most of
us like to think of ourselves as modern rational beings. Nonetheless, even
though our fear-based reactions are usually more subtle, we still tend to react
to threats much as people did ages ago. Basically, we all react with FIGHT,
FLIGHT, and FREEZE on a daily basis.
Couples
argue and workers rant (FIGHT). People leave marriages and people quit jobs
(FLIGHT). Spouses shut each other out and employees immerse themselves into
busy-work (FREEZE).
Modern
rational beings, however, have developed a fourth fear-based reaction that does
not fit the three older categories. I call this reactive category the “FACADE” –
a false front, a lie. Whether used as an attempt to hurt someone through
deception or to protect oneself or another person with a white-lie, a FACADE
reaction is a camouflage of the truth.
Additionally,
the four fear-based reactions do not require the pre-requisite of actual
danger. Simply feeling threatened is enough to trigger them. When reacting from
fear, the brain believes whatever you tell it. The brain does not know the
difference between what is real and what you believe to be real. Reality and
perceptions are equal under the fear-based reaction process.
It is
important to note that all fear-based reactions can be appropriate responses to
actual threatening circumstances. Unfortunately, they can also become habits
that may evolve into automatic patterns, even when there is no real threat.
Since habits by definition are “non-think” behaviors, in times of stress they
can cause you do something you will come to regret ... often leaving you with
considerable personal and professional consequences.
Instead
of leaving your life to chance, the key to success is to identify and overcome
your fear-based reactions to negative circumstances. Think of this book as your
“tool kit” in this quest for self-control.
It is by
becoming aware of your obvious fear-based reactions that it will become easier
for you to identify your more subtle ones. As you read the following
descriptions, try to determine your most common reactive patterns.
All of us have two things in common.
1)
We each have a tendency towards two of the four Fear-Based Reactions.
2) We each will occasionally demonstrate the other
two.
31
The FIGHT
Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FIGHT
fear-based reaction you give ultimatums, get sarcastic, become vengeful, yell,
or even attack someone physically. Whether you are actively seeking to fix
something, finish something, or punish someone…you say exactly what you mean.
You are, or can appear to be, unconcerned about the needs and feelings of
others.
You will
hear yourself asking “What?” types of questions:
“What’s
your problem?” … “What are you going to do about it?”
When
Negatively Consumed With RESULTS,
Your
Primary Characteristic Tends to Be JUDGMENTAL.
“I don’t get mad, I get even.”
“If you want something done right, you’ve got to do
it yourself.”
“The end justifies the means.”
Other
FIGHT Characteristics:
Aggressive
Manipulative Arrogant Sarcastic
Critical Demanding
Intimidating Insensitive Offensive
Argumentative
The
Extreme FIGHT Fear-Based Reaction: PARANOID
Ask yourself,
“Do I tend to be blunt with criticism and judgment?”
32
The
FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FLIGHT
fear-based reaction you panic, make excuses, rush, motor-mouth, or interrupt
others. Whether you are trying to find something for someone, make it to an
appointment, or get away from someone … you say the first thing that comes to
your mind. You are, or can appear to be, not listening to anyone else.
You will
hear yourself asking “Who?” or “When?” types of questions:
“Who do
you think you are?”… “Who is going to be there?”
“When is
the appointment?”… “When will you finally start listening to me?”
When
Negatively Consumed With RELATIONSHIPS,
Your
Primary Characteristic Tends to Be FRANTIC.
“I don’t have to take this, I’m out of here.” “Don’t
worry about it. I’ll take care of it later.” “I’ve got too much to do and not
enough time to do it.”
Other
FLIGHT Characteristics:
Distracted
Overwhelming Harried Panicked
Hyperactive Impulsive
Hurried Excitable Pushy
Scattered
The
Extreme FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction: HISTRIONIC (Frenzied)
Ask yourself,
“Do I easily become panicked?”
33
The
FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating the FREEZE
fear-based reaction you become analyzing, isolated, and generally avoid others.
Whether you are trying to get something right, figure something out, or avoid a
relationship … you do not even speak until you have had the time to collect
your thoughts. You are, or can appear to be, disconnected from others.
You will
hear yourself internally asking “How” types of questions:
“How can
you say that to me?”
“How can
I do all of this?”
When Negatively Consumed With TASKS,
Your Primary Characteristic Tends to Be
OVERWHELMED.
“I don’t want to talk about it.” “In the time it
takes to explain, I can do it myself.” “If you can’t say something nice, don’t
say anything at all.”
Other
FREEZE Characteristics:
Anxious Inward Picky Withdrawn Apprehensive
Serious Shameful Tense Isolated Shut-Down
The
Extreme FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction: AVOIDANT
Ask yourself,
“Do I generally avoid confrontation?”
34
The FACADE
Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FACADE
fear-based reaction you strive to make things look better than they really are.
Whether you are trying to protect yourself or someone else, you say what you
think others can handle, or what you feel they want to hear. You are, or can
appear to be, lacking integrity or lying.
You will
ask yourself or others “Why?” types of questions:
“Why me?”
… “Why can’t we just get along?”
“Nothing’s
wrong, why do you ask?”
When Negatively Consumed With
FEELINGS & EMOTIONS, Your Primary Characteristic Tends to Be WORRIED.
I say one thing to your face, but I’m thinking
something else.
Out loud, “I’m fine. I’m just fine.” Inside, “I’m
hurt and angry.” Out loud, “I’ll buy your product.” Inside, “I’ll
cancel tomorrow.”
Other
FACADE Characteristics:
Intimidated Defensive Phony Subordinate Guarded
Guilty Insecure Inferior Fragile Needy
The
Extreme FACADE Fear-Based Reaction: DEPENDENT
Ask yourself,
“Do I usually feel responsible for other’s feelings?”
35
EXTREME
Fear-Based Reactions
When you develop habitual
fear-based reactive patterns, over time you risk exaggerating them. These “Extreme”
fear-based reactions can actually resemble psychological disorders.* Is it ever
in your best interest to be viewed as such?
FIGHT
becomes PARANOID when everything is a threat.
FLIGHT
becomes HISTRIONIC when there is always a crisis.
FREEZE becomes AVOIDANT when the
solution is to have no relationships. FACADE become DEPENDENT when you always
think, “Don’t rock the boat.”
PARANOID HISTRIONIC
FIGHT FLIGHT
FREEZE FACADE
AVOIDANT DEPENDENT
! !
*Abnormal Psychology, Seligman, Walker &
Rosenhan, 2000
36
The FIGHT Reaction can become PARANOID behavior:
When the FIGHT reaction becomes a
habit, we not only attack real threats, we eventually begin to attack perceived
threats as well. As we become more sensitive to perceived threats, more
circumstances trigger this reaction, and paranoia eventually sets in. Woody
Allen once said, “It isn’t paranoia if
they really are out to get you.” However,
if you have ever spent any time with a paranoid
person, you know how any little thing can make them lose control.
The FLIGHT Reaction can become HISTRIONIC behavior:
When we were kids, my grandmother
used to tell us, “Quit running around
like chickens with your heads cut
off.” Some people leave jobs or relationships at the first sign of a challenge. Others become chatterboxes and push
others away with fidgety, hyperactive behavior. Either way, the results are the
same. People who run away from problems are usually running toward new ones.
The only thing that changes is how much easier it becomes to trigger the next
histrionic episode.
The FREEZE Reaction can become AVOIDANT behavior:
The FREEZE reaction can easily
grow into a pattern of avoidance, mostly because of the temporary sense of
peace it can bring. However, the long-term costs of shutting down overshadow
any short-term gains. Corporations need leaders who are quickly able to address
challenging situations, and predict problems rather than avoiding them. All
relationships require active involvement. Anyone who ignores small problems
only guarantees larger problems later.
The FAÇADE Reaction can become DEPENDENT behavior:
FACADE reactions can develop into
outright lies when a person spends considerable time worrying about the
feelings and reactions of others. These often take the form of “little” white
lies, but they are lies nonetheless. Increasingly, as this behavior becomes one
of dependence, self-worth slips away. The only way this person can feel good is
when someone else makes them feel good. Unfortunately, when another person is
in charge of your happiness, they are also in charge of your unhappiness. Or,
as my father used to say, “You give them the whole ball of wax.”
Ask
yourself (and be honest),
“Which
Extreme Fear-Based Reactions have I ever demonstrated?”
37
SECONDARY
Fear-Based Reactions
While everyone periodically
exhibits all four of the fear-based reactions, as creatures of habit, we all
tend to use one fear-based reaction more often than the rest. Additionally, we
each have one or two “Secondary” fear-based reactions that occur almost as often.
A
secondary fear-based reaction usually occurs immediately after the primary
fear-based reaction. For example, some people verbally or physically abuse
their spouse or lover in a fit of rage (FIGHT), then later apologize and
promise, “It will never happen again” (FACADE). In this abuse cycle, the FACADE
follows the FIGHT as a secondary
fear-based reaction.
My own
reaction cycle is just the opposite. FACADE is my primary fear-based reaction.
When threatened, I tend to worry about the other person’s feelings more than my
own. My behavior is affected accordingly, as I do not want to upset anyone.
However, if I am feeling attacked or unappreciated, I can easily move into
FIGHT (generally in the form of anger or sarcasm) as my secondary fear-based
reaction.
Another
common scenario is FACADE followed by FLIGHT. People will say, “Everything is fine,” when everything is
really not fine, and then run away as quickly
as possible. This is the pattern used when a spouse or lover says, “I love you”, and then leaves the relationship shortly thereafter. This is
also the pattern used when a customer
places an order when face-to-face with the salesperson, but calls to cancel the
next day.
|
PRIMARY |
|
SECONDARY |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIGHT |
|
FLIGHT,
FREEZE, or FACADE |
||
|
FLIGHT |
FIGHT, FREEZE, or FACADE |
|||
|
FREEZE |
FIGHT, FLIGHT, or FACADE |
|||
|
FACADE |
FIGHT, FLIGHT, or FREEZE |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many
people can have difficulty identifying their primary fear-based reaction,
especially when they have a secondary fear-based reaction that occurs quite
frequently. Do not worry if you have trouble distinguishing them.
The
important thing is to identify the fear-based reaction you are making, while
you are making it. Only then, regardless of whether it is a primary or
secondary reaction, can you make a conscious decision to overcome it.
38
SECONDARY Fear-Based Reactions
! ! ! ! FIGHT ! ! ! FLIGHT
FREEZE ! ! ! FACADE
Your
Secondary Fear-Based Reactions may be
INDEPENDENT
of your Primary Fear-Based Reaction.
For Example:
You could have a Primary Fear-Based Reaction of FREEZE,
with a Secondary Fear-Based Reaction
of FACADE at
work,
and another Secondary Fear-Based Reaction
of FIGHT at
home.
39
Position
Power
Everyone is on a quest for success. The desire may
be for love, financial gain, improved health, increased leadership, advancement
within an organization, or better relationships. Whatever the quest, assistance
and inspiration can be acquired from a multitude of sources.
Self-Help books, eBooks, DVDs,
CDs, blogs, and magazine articles abound. One can attend personal growth
seminars, sales management workshops, parenting classes, encounter groups,
Alcoholics Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, health-clubs, and marriage
encounters. Guidance is available from churches, schoolteachers, counselors,
therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, radio call-in shows, suicide
hot-lines, psychics, astrologers, business consultants, life coaches, keynote
speakers, gurus, Dear Abby, Dr. Phil McGraw, and from your parents.
Nevertheless, whether your
motivation is selfless or selfish, for love or for profit, virtually everything
available to you requires the development of your ability to get others to
change something. You are told that if you act in a certain manner people will
change how they treat you. Ask the right questions and a prospect will change
their attitude and buy your product, or join your organization. Treat your
resistant partner correctly and they will give you love. It may not always seem
like you are trying to control others, but if the objective is to change the
behaviors of others—it is control nonetheless.
Control has always been
successful in at least some situations and with certain people. But, its effectiveness
is diminishing rapidly. As such, the vast majority of resources miss the point:
All
attempts to control others are focused on the wrong person.
Leadership Effectiveness is an Art ...
The Art of Self-Control.
•
For some
people, self-control means toughness: “I don’t get mad, I get even.” (FIGHT)
•
For
others, it is all about leaving a way out, just in case something goes wrong: “I
don’t have to take this, I’m out of here.” (FLIGHT)
•
For many,
self-control is the ability to refrain from hurting others, even when they are
hurt or angry:
“If you can’t say something nice, don’t say
anything at all.” (FREEZE)
• And yet for others, self-control means to never
rock-the-boat.
“Tell people only what they want to hear,” or
“Tell people only what you think they can handle.” (FACADE)
40
Statements
such as these may seem like self-control to most people. But in reality, they
are all attempts to control others. People who are justifying these behaviors
are either trying to get someone else to do something (i.e. buying your
product), or trying to prevent them from doing something (i.e. leaving an
intimate relationship).
Unfortunately,
whether striving to be helpful or self-serving, the only way to ensure success
with these tactics is to establish some kind of position-power over others. As
such, employers, managers, salespeople, elected officials, police officers,
parents, spouses, and life-partners ultimately strive to get what they want by
establishing or enforcing the power of their position.
Position-Power
is nothing more than a
Fear-Based
justification to control others.
This can
be a Fear OF others, “You might hurt me,”
or it can
be a Fear FOR others: “You might hurt
yourself.”
Position-power
may be expressed blatantly with orders, threats, demands, hysterics, and
ultimatums. However, this manipulation can also be demonstrated in more subtle
ways, such as by shutting down, backing away, and by outright lies.
Nevertheless, whenever you attempt to control someone else, you have just
become the problem.
Most
people are their own worst enemies. To create desired results as a love-based
leader, you need to overcome fear-based impulses to exert position-power. Or,
as I say in my seminars, keynotes, and CDs: “Get Over Yourself.”
Regardless
of the intent, anyone using position-power to control others is facing
increasing resistance. Modern persons in democratic societies do not function
under a strict and inflexible hierarchy as our ancestors once did. In fact, we
resist and resent those who attempt to control us, even when we are told, “This is for your own good.” Just ask
any teenager.
Controlled
children may not rebel but, at best, they will have a limited relationship with
their parents when they become adults. A spouse can control their partner or
children but, in so doing, will typically destroy their love, respect, and
affection. Dishonest or incongruent salespeople may initially make money, but
sales from repeat business and referrals are rare. Dictatorships may seem to be
effective, but history teaches us that assassinations and revolutions are the
inevitable outcomes.
In the
short term, position-power can give intimate, family, and business
relationships the illusion of effectiveness. However, people with high levels
of self-worth are finding such fear-based environments increasingly
unacceptable. They have found, and will continue to find, better places to live
and work.
Those who
remain usually see the levels of fear increase in direct proportion to the
deterioration of the family or business. The cycle will continue until
excellence and passion are stifled. Personal and professional relationships
which
41
operate within this paradigm
cannot flourish. Resentment and resistance ultimately lead to sabotage,
diminished results, and even destruction. The good news is there is an
alternative to position-power.
The old
fear-based patterns are changing. People are beginning to realize they are
merely creating new problems whenever they justify fear-based reactions to
challenging or threatening circumstances.
Position-power
is losing ground to effective, innovative and forward thinking love-based
leaders who are striving to create loving relationships, joyful families,
business success, or effective government.
It is
becoming increasingly apparent that positive results
will come
through leaders ... not from them.
First,
you must establish self-control. Only then does it become appropriate to try
and help others identify and change their negative, non-productive, and
destructive behaviors. Until that time, such attempts will likely be
unsuccessful or short-lived.
To be
effective, a leader must become aware of his or her fear-based reactions and
make necessary decisions to overcome them. Love-based leadership is a skill
that can be sharpened and made more effective by increasing the capacity to
think, reason, and make conscious choices. The Love-Based Leader teaches you
how to overcome stress and create positive results, first by becoming aware of
your own negative position-power fear-based reactions and then by changing
them.
Instead
of focusing on what others are doing wrong, take responsibility for changing
yourself. Your leadership will be greatly enhanced.
The truth
is, the reactions of others are merely measurements of your own effectiveness,
or lack thereof. When you become aware of your own negative position-power
fear-based reactions, it becomes easier for you to see how you are attempting
to control others with actual or implied position-power, and therefore easier
to make alternative choices.
What are
your primary fear-based reactions? What are your secondary fear-based
reactions? Sometimes it helps to think about recent situations where you felt
some regret about your behaviors. Consider criticisms you have received. It is
important to be honest here. Watch out for “denial”.
While it
is easy to categorize the reactions of other people, courage is needed for an
honest self-evaluation. The following exercise will help you to get clear on
your own primary and secondary fear-based reactions. Review the following four
lists and circle everything you tend to demonstrate when things go wrong.
Everyone
demonstrates all of these qualities from time to time, but your results should
at least give you a good idea which one or two fear-based reactions you tend to
display most often. Your primary and secondary fear-based reactions will be the
two with the highest numbers. Once you learn how to overcome your two most
obvious fear-based reactions, it will become easier to deal with the more
subtle ones.
42
EXERCISE
#1 - Your Fear-Based Reactions
Circle
Your Most Frequent Negative Reactions
List A |
List B |
List C |
List D |
|
|
|
|
Aggressive |
Distracted |
Anxious |
Defensive |
|
|
|
|
Argumentative |
Excitable |
Apprehensive |
Fragile |
|
|
|
|
Arrogant |
Frantic |
Inward |
Guarded |
|
|
|
|
Critical |
Harried |
Isolated |
Guilt |
|
|
|
|
Demanding |
Hurried |
Overwhelmed |
Inferior |
|
|
|
|
Intimidating |
Hyperactive |
Picky |
Insecure |
|
|
|
|
Insensitive |
Impulsive |
Serious |
Intimidated |
|
|
|
|
Judgmental |
Overwhelming |
Shameful |
Needy |
|
|
|
|
Manipulative |
Panicked |
Shut-Down |
Phony |
|
|
|
|
Offensive |
Pushy |
Tense |
Subordinate |
|
|
|
|
Sarcastic |
Scattered |
Withdrawn |
Worried |
|
|
|
|
Total the number of circled items in each column:
_________ _________ _________ _________
FIGHT FLIGHT FREEZE FACADE
Your
PRIMARY Fear-Based Reaction (the highest number) ________
Your
SECONDARY Fear-Based Reaction (the 2nd highest number) ________
Helpful Hints:
If you will not do this exercise
... your PRIMARY Fear-Based Reaction is probably FIGHT.
If you exhibit all four reactions
equally ... your PRIMARY Fear-Based Reaction is probably FLIGHT.
If you
are stuck and cannot decide ... your PRIMARY Fear-Based Reaction is probably
FREEZE.
If you worry about getting it right
... your PRIMARY Fear-Based Reaction is probably FACADE.
43
The Four Fear-Based Reactions
“When you react to your fear,
you do everything exactly wrong.”
My ski
instructor in New Zealand
44
CHAPTER 2
Fear is
NOT the Problem
It is relatively easy to be
love-based—energized, caring, confident, and peaceful
... when everything is fine. The trick is to be able to do so when faced with
unwanted circumstances.
Unexpected
challenges such as unemployment, harassment, crime, abuse, divorce, illness,
accidents, injury, and death are unpleasant events to be sure. However, they
are not the problem. The problem occurs when such events trigger your negative
fear-based reactions.
Having
Fear is NOT the Problem.
Getting
Rid of Fear is NOT the Solution
Fear-based
reactions may take the form of white lies, manipulation, panic, nasty facial
expressions, sarcasm, insincere agreements, shutting down, phony smiles,
nervous laughter, jokes, or yelling. They can also be as severe as avoiding
clients, refusing to phone prospects, quitting jobs, firing employees, dropping
out of school, running away from home, divorce, child abuse, drunk driving,
drug abuse, suicide, murder, or war.
It is
important to remember that fear itself is not the problem. We all feel fear. It
is a natural response to a threatening situation. It is our negative reactions
to fears that create our problems. These reactions occur when we are either
overwhelmed by fears of perceived threats, or as a direct result of having been
in denial of our fears of real threats. Either way, the answer is always the
same … love-based leaders overcome automatic, non-think, fear-based reactions.
45
George’s
Story
The names are fictitious, but the
following story is true. About 1950, George’s friend Bob started a company in
Thousand Oaks, California. Bob became the president of the new company, and the
majority stockholder. David, the vice-president, was the financial backer and
held most of the remaining shares.
George
was hired as the plant manager and was given a small share in the company. Bob
promised George, “Don’t worry. You will
be taken care of when the business succeeds.”
Even
though his salary was less, and he had far fewer shares than the other
partners, for all intents and purposes, George considered it to be his company.
For the next 25 years he worked days, evenings, weekends, and even on holidays
when needed.
Because
of the teamwork, friendship, and abilities of the three partners, the company
became a profitable business employing over 300 people. This was one of those
companies from which people never quit, and where there was rarely a firing. It
was a big event whenever there was a marriage, birth, or retirement. It was
more like a family than a business.
Then one
day, David announced his retirement. A little later, George got a note from the
boss:
George,
I need to meet with you at 9:00 tomorrow morning. We have something very
important to discuss.
Bob
As most
people would do, George immediately began thinking something like, “Twenty-five years and finally I will get
the promotion I deserve.” He was certain that he would get a raise and a larger
share of the company.
Of
course, George could not wait to tell his wife the good news. He got home early
to tell her, and she almost burst into tears with joy. She exclaimed, “We’ve waited so long for this!”
46
George’s
wife then told him that the beautiful home they had dreamed of owning was up
for sale. This house was on a hillside with a beautiful swimming pool and a
breathtaking view of the entire Conejo Valley. With a larger salary, plus the
equity in their home, they were certain they would qualify for a loan. All
evening their excitement continued to grow.
George
got very little sleep that night, and in the morning his wife fixed him a
wonderful breakfast. As he left for work his wife called out, “Don’t forget to call.” George was deeply in love with his wife, and hugely
appreciative of her years of quiet
support. He knew that he could never have achieved this without her.
George
got to his office full of anticipation, and got to the boss’s office early.
George was waiting as the boss entered and said. “Good morning, George, come on
in,” and he told his secretary to hold all calls.
“As you know,” he began, “David is retiring and
we need to replace him. George, I want you to be the first to know that I’m
bringing my cousin Horace in from Toronto to be the new vice-president. I need
for you to teach him the business.”
Remember,
this is a true story.
How would you feel if this were happening to you?
George
immediately exploded with anger and demanded an explanation. The boss bluntly
replied, “George, I need to hire Horace
in this position and you’re the one
person I can count on to make sure he is properly trained. I need you to do
this for me. I can’t get into it now. But, don’t worry; I’ll take care of you.”
Then, without further explanation, the boss left the building.
George
left the boss’s office dazed, but filled with resentment. He was resenting the
boss, Horace, David and most especially, himself.
Negative
thoughts were racing through George’s head.
“Twenty-five years. He promised me.
How can he treat me like this?” The resentment kept building. “I made this company for him! He’s gotten
rich off of me. He’s taken vacations I could never afford. This is the thanks I
get? I trusted him.”
At this
point, George moved from resentment to resistance. He resisted calling his
wife. He resisted working. He just sat at his desk, suffering ... until he
finally headed for a bar. Then, about 2:00AM, he went home.
George’s
wife had been waiting all day for the phone call about the promotion. Instead,
he came home late, drunk, and angry. Things got much worse when he told her the
“good news” about Horace.
“How can you let them treat you like this?” She shouted. She resented Bob, Horace, and especially George. She even resented herself for
supporting George for so many years. She stormed off to the bedroom. George
slept on the couch, and fixed himself cold cereal for breakfast.
47
The next
morning, George arrived late for work. His resistance was increasing with
thoughts such as, “After all, I’ve worked
weekends, nights, and even holidays
for this company. I’ve earned a late morning, and then some.”
At the
office, Bob introduced George to Horace, and asked him to take the new
vice-president around the plant to meet everyone. George reluctantly agreed.
“This is Horace, our new vice-president,” he told them.
“He is going to show us how to make our company work.” George winked and
gave smirks to these people who were
his close friends. His resentment and resistance spread, and many people became
angry and resentful because George was not promoted.
Upon
returning to the office, George was introduced to Horace’s wife. She and the
boss’s wife had been house-hunting all morning. “Horace, you’ll never believe
the house we found,” she gushes . “It’s
a beautiful home up in the hills, with a swimming pool and a breathtaking view.”
"My God,” George thought. “They’re buying
our dream house. If my wife finds out about this ..." He could not
even finish this thought because of his fear
of her reactions. His resentment was growing.
Horace’s
wife continued, “Bob has agreed to help
us with the down payment. Let’s go
see it and make an offer right now!” That was about all George could stand. He began thinking of how to get
his revenge.
George
took money from petty cash and headed for the racetrack. "I’ve earned it," he
justified. “Besides, I’ll pay it back.
They owe me a chance to win a little money.” Of course, he lost it all.
His
resistance was intensifying. George spent almost no energy training Horace, but
a great deal of time in the plant with his friends, venting his anger at the
boss and at Horace. Otherwise, he continued losing money at the track almost
every day.
Suddenly,
his thefts were discovered shortly after the president called for a surprise
audit. While he did not call the police, Bob felt he had no choice but to fire
George from the only job he ever loved.
Unfortunately,
George’s tribulations were not over. Not long after he was fired, his wife left
him. His children were so angry about how badly he had hurt their mother that
they never spoke to him again. George lost his job, his marriage, and his
family. Eventually, he went bankrupt, become an alcoholic, and died a lonely
and bitter shell of a man.
This is a sad story. Nevertheless, it is not why it
is being shared here.
You see,
there is one thing George never knew. Bob could not bring himself to tell
George or anyone else that he had just found out he was dying of cancer. He was
consumed with two things, and two things only … the survival of his company and
the financial needs of his wife.
It turns
out that Bob feared that if news of his condition reached his customers, they
might lose confidence and shift to a different supplier. Bob also thought that
if the company were sold, his loyal employees might lose their jobs. He decided
to hide the truth (the Freeze and Facade reactions), and devised a scheme.
First,
Bob bought back David’s shares in the company and persuaded him to retire.
Next, he arranged for Horace to move to Thousand Oaks and become the new
vice-president. Bob wanted Horace to learn the business from George because, in
return for his many years of loyal service and friendship, he was going to give
the company to George.
48
Bob knew that George would run
the company properly and that the employees would gladly work for him. The only
condition was that George would share the profits with Bob’s wife for as long
as she lived. Bob felt he could trust George, and that he really did deserve to
be the president and owner.
However, because of his justified
fear-based reactions due to his resentments, George lost it all. Not long after
George was fired, Bob died. Horace was incapable of running the company, and
since he had no support from the employees, it soon went out of business.
The shares Bob was going to give
to George became worthless. Bob’s wife was forced to live with her children.
Three hundred dedicated employees lost their jobs, with incalculable effects on
their family’s lives. After everything was said and done, George’s behavior
hurt his wife, his family, the boss’s wife, and his co-workers and their
families.
Who loses
when you justify Fear-Based Reactions
because
of Resentment?
EVERYONE
The question before the house is, “What
alternatives did George have?” Actually, he had several.
1.
George
could have quit and formed his own company. He had the personal resources and
the banking connections to do this. Additionally, most of the good employees
and most of the customers would have readily followed him. Could George have
overcome his RESENTMENT to create his own company?
2.
He could
have quit and gotten a better job with a company that appreciated his value,
and there were several who would have taken him in a heartbeat. Again, most of
the employees and customers would have followed him. Could George have overcome
his RESENTMENT to get a better job?
3.
George
could have re-committed himself to the existing company and trained the new man
as requested, thus further solidifying his position with his boss (which is
exactly what would have happened in this case). Could George have overcome his
RESENTMENT to improve this company? To be sure, this was unlikely. But was it
possible?
But instead of these
alternatives, and because of his resentment, George chose a path that led to
the destruction of virtually everything he cared about. This is the path of the
“Three Stages of Fear-Based Reacting”. Once begun, it is very hard to get off
of this path.
49
RESENTMENT
The First
Stage of Fear-Based Reacting
RESENTMENT is the first stage of
fear-based reacting. Resentment by itself is not the problem, it is a natural
feeling. Just as you feel joy when someone pleases you, you feel resentment
when someone hurts you. You can even resent yourself. But it is what you do
because of the feelings of resentment, or in spite of them, that determines if
you are leading from love or reacting from fear.
You have
almost certainly resented the people who have hurt you, your family, your
friends, your company, your faith, or your country. You have also resented
people who controlled you, or who even attempted to control you, even when they
were doing it, “for YOUR own good.”
You may
also have resented others when you were unable to control them, even when you
believed what you were doing was “for THEIR own good,” or for the
good of your family, or your company. Regardless of your initial justifications
for resentment, if you do not overcome your resentments, your fear-based
reactions will escalate.
All acts
of aggression and retaliation have one thing at their base:
RESENTMENT
Yes, we
resent people we hate. However, as any parent who has resented a child who did
not listen to them knows, we can also resent people we love. For this reason,
people are often perplexed by their own resentment. However, as with all
feelings, resentment has a purpose. You do not enjoy the feelings of
resentment, but they do have value. They inform you that you have been hurt.
Imagine
your hand is burning in a fire. Pain tells you to remove your hand before it is
permanently damaged. Nobody enjoys the sensation of pain when being burned, but
there is value in the pain because it makes you respond quickly and thus avoid
greater injury.
If you
were to treat your burning hand the same way many people typically handle
resentment in an argument, instead of removing your hand you would probably say
something such as, “The fire should
change. Why should I move my hand? The
fire should not be treating me this way. After all, I’ve given it the best
years of my life!” But the damage would still continue.
Likewise,
when you justify your fear-based reactions because of resentment, the damage to
yourself and others also continues. Additionally, because fear-based reactions
tend to escalate the scale of damage, solutions become progressively more
difficult to implement at each successive stage.
50
RESISTANCE
The
Second Stage of Fear-Based Reacting
After Resentment, the second
stage of fear-based reacting is RESISTANCE. Do not confuse resistance with
caution. In many situations, caution is necessary for survival.
Resistance,
on the other hand, is a signal you are no longer in control of yourself or your
destiny, and that the choices you are making are ultimately not in your best
interest. Resistance is self-destructive and does nothing to create self-worth,
quality relationships, or business success.
Resistance
can be expressed in many ways. People who feel unappreciated resist giving 100%
in a job. Shy people resist sharing, even if they hate themselves for not
speaking up. Angry people resist being patient and giving love, despite the
fact the people they care about are being pushed away. Battered women resist
leaving abusive husbands, while living in terror. Frightened people resist new
relationships, even when they loathe being alone.
What is the normal reaction to change?
RESISTANCE
(Even if
what you are doing is not working)
It is
obvious that resistance to removing your hand, when you feel pain in a fire,
would be destructive to your hand. What is not so obvious is that resistance to
changing your behavior, when you feel resentment in an argument, is just as
destructive to yourself and your relationships. Pain and resentment are
feelings intended to inform you of danger. Resistance to these signals can be
disastrous.
Sometimes,
you justify your resistance to expressing hurt or anger because you do not wish
to upset people whom you care about, or whom you fear. “After all,” you may
rationalize, “it was really not a big
deal,” and you repress your negative
feelings. Eventually these feelings will become stronger than your resistance
to expressing them.
Additionally,
most people have resisted themselves from time to time. Have you ever resisted
sharing your thoughts and feelings, perhaps out of a fear of being rejected,
used, laughed at, or criticized?
Yes, it
can be difficult to implement love-based solutions at the Resistance Stage.
Nevertheless, whether the resistance is to yourself or someone else, it is far
easier here than attempting to do so at the third stage of fear-based reacting.
51
REVENGE
The Third
Stage of Fear-Based Reacting
After Resentment comes
Resistance. Unless a conscious choice is made at that point, REVENGE (the third
stage of fear-based reacting) becomes inevitable.
Revenge
comes with a built in irony. While it targets others in an attempt to
get-back-at, get-even-with, or get-away-from them, revenge carries elements of
self-sabotage, or even self-destruction, as we develop emotional reactions, and
programs of hatred. In fact, revenge by us can easily become more damaging to
us than what has been done to us.
As with
resistance, revenge can take many different forms. Theft, sabotage, divorce,
abuse, ridicule, destruction of property, violence, and murder are but a few
examples. People have even been known to destroy themselves with drugs and
suicide, in order to hurt someone else.
“When you hurt someone else, you hurt yourself a
lot worse.” Your Grandmother
Vengeance
targets people you hate, such as those who have abused you or who have abused a
loved one, a friend who let you down, the “other” man or woman, a thief, your
ex-spouse, or an employer. When you blame your negative behaviors on another
person, destruction will ultimately result. Your reaction becomes the other
person’s negative circumstance, which increases the chances for them to react
(again).
George,
for example, rationalized his thefts from petty cash to fund his trips to the
race-track. He wanted to get even with his lifetime friend (his boss) for
passing him over for the big promotion.
Revenge
can also be directed at people whom you care about. You might spank a child for
embarrassing you. You may gossip about a co-worker friend who got “your”
promotion. You can even take revenge on yourself if you are upset at something
you did, or did not do. Revenge always feels justified.
When you
react often enough, eventually your negative behaviors will not even need a
trigger to occur. When that happens, your negativity ceases to be a behavior.
It becomes your self-image.
52
Pre-Actions
and Survival Programs
People tend to have a fear-based
reaction when threatened with a negative situation. If there is any perceived
benefit associated with that fear-based reaction, the behavior is likely to be
repeated when faced with the same or similar circumstance.
A
fear-based reaction, when repeated enough, eventually occurs prior to the
negative circumstance, “Just in case.”
This behavior is no longer a reaction ... it is now a “Pre-Action”.
Pre-Actions
Conscious Fear-Based behaviors, which occur BEFORE
negative circumstances (real or perceived) NOT as a
result of them.
For
example, a small boy cries when he falls and hurts himself. This is a natural
response to pain. However, he often learns the lesson that it is unacceptable
for boys to show their feelings. He may hear, “Don’t be such a baby,” “Have
a stiff upper-lip,” “Be a man,” or the classic, “If you don’t stop crying, I’ll give you something to cry about.” He
might even get a spanking. His father
may be cruel and insensitive, or he could be concerned that his son may get
picked on for being a crybaby.
Regardless
of his father’s intentions, because he is experiencing consequences for crying,
eventually the child may conclude, “Crying
only makes things worse.” Then
one day he hurts himself and starts to cry, but is able to hold back his tears … on purpose.
This
choice to refrain from crying around his father is a conscious pre-action, with
a clear perceived value ... he is either praised or ignored by Daddy. To the
little boy, either response is far superior to spankings, threats, or ridicule.
With this validation, his pre-action of withholding tears is likely to be
repeated until it becomes an unconscious habit ... a “Survival Program”.
Survival
Programs
Pre-Actions that are repeated until they occur
unconsciously.
Unfortunately, survival programs,
because they are unconscious, can easily render what was originally an
effective pre-action to become non-productive, negative, or even
self-destructive. It does not take much to change survival programs into
self-sabotaging “Non-Survival Programs”.
53
The Sand
Wasp
Once upon a time, some scientists
were studying sand wasps. While observing their eating habits, they discovered
a strange habit indigenous to the species.
Every
morning the sand wasps scoured the desert for food. Usually they found a dead
fly or some other bug. However, instead of eating the meal out in the open, the
sand wasps would carry the food back to their respective holes in the sand. For
some reason, they would drop their breakfast outside before entering their
home. After a few moments, each would return for their food and go back inside
to eat. No sand wasp ever deviated from this behavior.
Apparently,
over the centuries, natural selection favored sand wasps with two
survival-programs: 1) never eat outside, and 2) always check for intruders
before bringing food inside to eat. Both of these survival-programs decreased
the chance of sand wasps being eaten by a predator, and therefore increased the
chances for the survival of the species.
The
scientists decided to find out just how firmly this program was ingrained. They
observed a sand wasp with a dead horsefly. When it left its food next to the
entrance of its hole to check inside, the scientists moved the horsefly a
couple of feet away.
The sand
wasp returned to get its breakfast and, of course, found nothing. It began to
look for food, just as if it never had it in the first place. After a few
minutes, the sand wasp found the same horsefly and proceeded to drag it back to
its hole, leave it, and again go inside to look for intruders.
Again,
the scientists moved the horsefly while the sand wasp was gone. When it
returned to find its food missing, the sand wasp began to search for food again
– and again – and again.
The
scientists kept repeating this experiment, always with the same results.
Eventually the sand wasp died of exhaustion and starvation, literally with food
in its mouth. The scientists surmised the sand wasp was incapable of changing
its survival-program, even when circumstances had turned it into a non-survival
program.
Moral
A great many sand wasps are disguised as people… doing the same thing
over and over again, even if it isn’t doing them any good.
Even if it is killing them.
54
Non-Survival
Programs
People may be ignorant, but they
are not stupid. There is always some value to a fear-based reaction. Otherwise,
this type of behavior would never be repeated often enough to become a
conscious pre-action – and, ultimately, an unconscious survival program.
While Survival Programs always have some value, they are only valuable
in the specific situations for which they were created.
Since
they are unconscious, survival programs can lose effectiveness, and even become
invitations to disaster, when circumstances change. For example, “Look both ways before you cross the street”
is a common admonition by parents who
are trying to create safe behavior in their children. Typically, this warning
occurs so often that it becomes an automatic survival program, needing no
thought whatsoever. Eventually, it occurs when the act is unnecessary. In fact,
most adults probably look both ways even when crossing a one-way street.
However,
just as with the Sand Wasp, even the survival program of looking both ways
before crossing the street has the potential of becoming a non-survival program
capable of causing injury and death. It almost happened to me.
On my
first trip to New Zealand, I was almost run over as I crossed the street. As is
my survival program, I automatically looked to the left to check the road in
the direction I am used to the traffic coming from. Unfortunately for me, in
New Zealand the traffic travels in the opposite direction.
Seeing it
was all clear to the left, I stepped off the curb an instant before I looked to
the right … where the traffic was actually coming from. Oops. Fortunately, a
wonderfully alert friend pulled me back just as I was about to be flattened by
a bus. My survival program, which had served me in the USA, did not serve me in
New Zealand. It had become a non-survival program, because it had me look the
wrong way first.
In the
earlier example, the little boy developed a survival program of withholding his
feelings. This behavior clearly protected him, because it placated his father.
The
little boy grew up, got a job, and got married – but retained his unconscious
survival program of withholding his feelings. This created a strain on both his
career and his marriage. He had difficulty sharing his ideas at work, and could
not open up with his wife at all.
He did
not succeed to his potential in the workplace, because he was afraid to risk
the rejection of his ideas. This man also failed to succeed in his marriage, as
his frustrated spouse divorced him because he was emotionally unavailable to
her. The fear-based survival program, which once served the child, did not
serve the adult. His survival program had become a non-survival program.
55
Three Classic Survival Programs
1)
“Don’t
talk to strangers” is a
classic survival program that can protect children from harm. However, it
often shifts from a survival to non-survival program later in life. When your
boss tells you to go and find new clients he or she might as well say, “Go
talk to strangers.”
2)
“Eat
everything on your plate” is
another common survival program. Following this instruction
eliminates ridicule and punishment at meals. However, it goes from a survival
program to a non-survival program years later when you have a weight problem …
and are not able to leave the table if any food is remaining on your plate,
even when you have had enough to eat.
3)
“Children
should be seen and not heard” and “Don’t
speak unless spoken to” are survival programs that can keep children
from being punished in social situations. They become
non-survival programs when low self-worth and anxiety prevent successful
personal and professional relationships.
A valuable survival program in
one environment can easily become a destructive non-survival program in another.
Once a survival program becomes a non-survival program, it will continue to be
self-destructive until you change your behavior. Unfortunately, most of us make
excuses instead of changing.
“I’m sorry. I haven’t slept in two days.” “Of
course I’m mad. You broke your promise to me.” “It wasn’t my fault. He cut me
off.” “I’m only yelling at you because you’re yelling at me!”
“I’m overwhelmed. I don’t mean to be taking it out
on you.” “If you had a childhood like mine, you’d be messed-up too.” and my personal favorite: “I’m only human.”
Do any of these excuses sound familiar?
56
Most
people are their own worst enemy. They continue demonstrating behaviors long
after the situation for which they created the behavior has ended ... thus
creating a non-survival program.
Many
people continue to demonstrate non-survival programs even after they have
become aware of the problems those programs are creating (such as smoking,
violence, unworthiness, shyness, arrogance, and so on). Whether conscious or
unconscious, these programs sabotage personal and professional results.
Furthermore, the negative results will continue until there is a conscious
choice to change the behavior.
“If you always do what you’ve always done,
you’ll always get what you’ve always got.”
Various Sources
In other
words, if you want to get something different, you have to do something
different. Unfortunately, the normal reaction to change is to resist it. Even
when the old benefits are gone, the program often remains. Benjamin Franklin
reportedly fought this tendency by changing a habit every 21 days.
Interestingly, two centuries later, Maxwell Maltz showed in his book, Psychocybernetics,
that it takes 21 days to change a habit.
One of
the great myths is, “Mistakes are just
learning experiences.” Nonsense; mistakes are NOT learning experiences ...
unless you actually learn something from them and make changes. By continuing
old survival programs that have become non-productive, negative, or even destructive,
you only succeed in cementing the guarantee that nothing will ever change.
In what ways have you become your own worst enemy,
with Survival Programs that have become non-productive, negative, or even
destructive Non-Survival Programs?
Fortunately,
we are not sand wasps. Human beings have the ability to evaluate their
circumstances and do things differently. Herein is our ability to develop
leadership excellence.
57
The Three
Levels of Negative Circumstances
Despite the fact that all
negative reactions are fear-based, fear is not the issue. Fear is valuable; it
can keep us alive when there is danger. The real problem is the negative,
non-productive, or destructive behaviors that can be triggered by even a small
level of fear.
Negative
circumstances do not cause fear-based reactions, but they are used to justify
them. When you react to being hurt, or pre-act to the possibility of being
hurt, you blame others for your fear-based reactions. For example, “I wouldn’t
have yelled at you if you hadn’t yelled at me.”
The Three
Levels of Negative Circumstances
Level 1:
DISTRACTION
Level 2:
DAMAGE
Level 3:
DEATH
Fear-based
reactions are rationalized, even if afterwards you wish you had behaved
differently. You may say, “I can’t
believe I yelled at her,” but you rationalized it anyway, perhaps because
you were frustrated. At other times you might think, “I should have ripped his lungs out,” but you either justified
withholding your anger to protect this person, or to protect yourself.
Negative
circumstances do not cause fear-based reactions. If they did, we would all
react in the same way when faced with a similar event, and we would do so every
time. Yes, people have habits and tendencies, but nobody acts the same way all
of the time.
Consider
child abuse. It has been said that all child abusers were abused as children.
Those who know the horror of it are the ones who pass it on to others. For
these people, the problem has evolved from being abused by others, to one of
being abusive to others.
Yet not
all abused children become abusers. For some people, the negative circumstance
of abuse has created new problems. They have become inward, fearful, shy,
distant and avoidant.
However,
there are people who have been abused who have become neither abusive nor
avoidant. These are the ones who now strive to help others. Often, they become
counselors for other victims of abuse. Sometimes, they even become counselors
for abusers. I have met many such people. Their power is awesome.
As
destructive as child abuse is, the circumstance of abuse is not the real issue
for adult survivors. Their true problems are the fear-based reactions they have
developed as a result of the abuse. Ultimately, it will be whether they choose
to overcome these behaviors which will determine how successful they will
become as adults.
58
There are
no guarantees. When you choose to strive for solutions to problems, others may
still choose to react. If that is the case, however, you really have not lost
anything. Anyone who reacts negatively to positive suggestions would have most
likely been negative regardless of your actions. By taking the higher road, you
create a chance for positive results, and those results can be amazing.
I have
heard stories of hurt ranging from minor to deadly. Not surprisingly, the most
intense reaction to hurtful situations is hatred. However, since hate is an
intensely unpleasant emotion, many people will resist sharing or even
acknowledging personal hurtful experiences. Unfortunately, just as a cancer you
ignore remains deadly, the hate you bury is still destructive.
I have
often said, “However hurtful the event;
hate is a choice. Hurt does not cause
hate. You can make other choices.” Reactions to this statement have ranged from confusion to angry
disbelief.
For
example, I have six children. I have been blessed to be present at each birth.
During labor, I watched my wife’s pain of childbirth increase to levels
incomprehensible to me. However, when the big moment finally arrived, I
observed a wave of peace and unlimited love for the child whose birth caused
the extreme pain that still gives me shivers. I doubt any male can truly
comprehend the experience.
If hurt
caused hate, all mothers would loathe their newborns. In reality, many women go
from agony to serenity just moments after giving birth. Most women would call
the police if a man caused them one-tenth of the pain they experienced in
childbirth, and they would resent him for decades.
“Now ladies," I ask my students, "if a man were causing you this level of pain, would you be
filled with joy and peace, just because he stopped? Relief, perhaps. But joy?”
Depending
on the group, if they do not laugh, they simply frown and shake their heads and
say, “No.” They know, of course, that
in childbirth, peace does not occur simply because the pain stops. Indeed, the
pain often continues. There is peace because something significant was
accomplished.
Conversely,
pain without a meaningful purpose is just suffering. Peace and joy do not
follow, resentment does. “You hurt me and
I hate you!” However, by hating, you suffer even more.
Many times I have said, “If you hate someone, who has the hate?” “I do,” is the typical response.
Then I ask, “What’s
that hate doing to you?”
Many people have rationalized and
avoided a truthful answer. But eventually, each would look at me and say, “It’s killing me, Ross.”
“Hating someone is like taking rat poison, and
expecting the other person to die.”
A participant in one of my seminars
59
Level-3
Negative Circumstance: DEATH
There is nothing more challenging
to human beings than facing death. While some of us have more experiences with
death than others, all of us will have at least our own death to deal with.
Many people spend a lifetime in terror of dying. Nevertheless, if you are
consumed with fears of death you cannot truly live.
We are
often overwhelmed with the passing of loved ones. We are also affected by the
deaths of strangers, especially when it feels unjust. This was clearly
demonstrated by the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Billions of people, not just friends, relatives, and acquaintances of the
victims, felt a deep personal loss.
Level-3
Negative Circumstances often inspire “eye-for-an-eye” reactions, as well as
possible escalations. One drive-by shooting is invariably followed by another.
Convicted murderers may face the death penalty. A bombing in Northern Ireland
only serves to justify a bloody retaliation. The United States invaded
Afghanistan and Iraq following the attacks of September 11, 2001.
“An eye for an eye for an eye for an eye ...
ends in making everybody blind.”
Mahatma Gandhi
“The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everyone
blind.”
Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr.
Leo
Buscaglia (the former “Love 101” professor at the University of Southern
California, hugging activist, PBS personality, and author of the book, “Love”) viewed death as an
inevitability, and said that we should stop being consumed with it and enjoy
life. He used to joke about death in an attempt to reduce people’s fear of it.
At an address at the University of Illinois he mused, “We are trapped! None of us
will ever get off this planet alive!”
60
Level-2
Negative Circumstance: DAMAGE
Level-2 Negative Circumstances
involve damage or destruction. Examples could include being passed over for a
promotion, having a house fire, being involved in a car accident, being
audited, getting mugged, having an idea stolen, breaking off an engagement,
being physically or sexually abused, getting fired, going to jail, losing the
value in a retirement account, getting a divorce, going bankrupt, or breaking
an arm.
Regardless
of how bad a Level-2 Negative Circumstance might be, at least you survived.
Yet, many of us have seen people react so strongly that they have turned a
Level-2 difficulty into a Level-3 disaster. A simple fender-bender often
triggers road rage, which sometimes escalates into a fatal second collision. A disgruntled employee loses his job, then
returns to shoot his boss, or other employees. In a bad economy, people have
committed suicide after losing money on their investments.
“That which does not kill me makes me stronger.”
Friedrich Nietzsche
The
problem is not what triggers your negative reactions. The problem is that your
negative reactions are “trigger-able”.
No matter
how much you feel justified to react negatively, it rarely creates success or
peace in the long run. Reacting to a Level-2 Negative Circumstance often makes
a bad situation much worse. In fact, it was his fear-based reactions to an
incorrect perception of a Level-2 Negative Circumstance, which led George to
make choices that were destructive to himself and everything he loved.
More
importantly, when you choose to lead with love in a Level-2 Negative
Circumstance there is always a benefit. Always. Even if the only benefit is to
your blood-pressure.
Face it,
fear-based reactions to Level-2 Negative Circumstances tend to escalate. Think
of the minimal damage Friendly Fred caused to the Cadillac, which escalated
when my father damaged Fred’s lawn, sprinkler and draperies.
Fred
owned guns. I shudder to think where this escalation of fear-based reactions
could have ended, had my mother not turned Friendly Fred and my father around
with a simple love-based gift of flowers and a note. I wonder what George could
have created if he had chosen to lead with love?
61
Level-1
Negative Circumstance: DISTRACTION
Now we come to Level 1, by far
the most common negative circumstances. They include irritations,
inconveniences, and unwanted surprises, such as having a bad waiter or being
stuck in traffic. Other examples could include having a critical spouse,
getting laughed at, having a bad hair day, missing a big sale, or your kids
spilling their milk.
Reacting to Level-1 Negative
Circumstances always makes you “smaller”. Or, as my father said on the Thursday
night of my first LifeStream seminar in
1975 (page 11), “You are only as big as the smallest thing it takes to upset you.”
Have you ever yelled at someone who was yelling at you? Did you ever gossip
about someone who had an affair? How about lying to someone who lied to you, or
shutting someone out because he or she annoyed you? Then there is my favorite,
have you ever pretended that things are “Fine. Just fine,” when you
actually feel hurt and angry?
A
Fear-Based Reactor focuses on the REASON he or she is reacting.
A
Love-Based Leader focuses on the FACT he or she is reacting at all.
Have you
ever gotten angry with someone who cut you off, because they just missed
colliding with your car? In reality, they missed you. There was no accident
(which would have been a Level-2 Negative Circumstance) and no one died (a
Level-3 Negative Circumstance). Isn’t NOT getting hit by another car a good
thing? Nevertheless, there are many stories of road rage escalating similar
Level-1 negative circumstances into manslaughter (Level-3). They did not even
need a fender-bender to justify it. “You
almost hit me” was enough of an excuse.
When you
are reacting negatively to a relatively small problem, you are usually hurting
yourself more than the problem did. There is only one way to handle Level-1
Negative Circumstances, and that is to “Get Over Yourself” (which also helps
with Level-2 and Level-3).
“Get Over
Yourself” is much more than just a cute phrase or a negative put-down. I have
used this expression to define a concept that has helped thousands of people to
improve their results in life. People see their health, attitude,
relationships, and leadership effectiveness increase when they stop taking
themselves too seriously. In fact, I have seen seminar participants create
miraculous new circumstances in their lives by using the concepts and tools
presented in my “Get Over Yourself” CDs and seminars.
Everyone
will face Level-1 Negative Circumstances on a daily basis. Quit letting the
small stuff push your buttons. Do not turn your mole-hills into mountains. It
is time to stop reacting negatively, and to instead learn to laugh at yourself.
If you do not “Get Over Yourself,” you will be giving your power away to every
little thing that goes wrong.
62
The
Reactive Cycle
Whether you are overwhelmed by
fears, or are in denial of fears, the real problem remains the same. It is not
the negative circumstances that need addressing, but rather your fear-based
reactions to them.
Not only
do your fear-based reactions create their own negative circumstances for you,
they also automatically become the negative circumstances for other people. You
are reacting because they are reacting. They are reacting because you are
reacting. Once begun, this cycle is extremely difficult to stop and it usually
escalates.
Let us
say you make the statement, “I wouldn’t
have yelled at you, if you hadn’t
yelled at me.” Then the other person argues, “Well, I wouldn’t have yelled at you, if you had kept your promise” (or
something similar). Justifications for fear-based
reactions are easy to come by.
When
everyone blames everyone else for his or her own negativity, nobody is in
charge. This is when damage occurs. Sometimes the damage is major.
While
undesired situations often trigger your fear-based reactions, they do not cause
them. Your negative circumstances are simply the excuses. They then become the
excuses for other people’s fear-based reactions in return. Once initiated,
continued negativity accelerates this cycle.
|
Their Behavior |
|
Becomes Your Negative |
|
Circumstance, |
|
So You
React |
Your Reaction |
Your Reaction |
Becomes Their Negative |
Becomes Their Negative |
Circumstance, |
Circumstance, |
So They
React |
So They
React |
|
Their Behavior |
|
Becomes Your Negative |
|
Circumstance, |
|
So You
React |
When you
are in The Reactive Cycle, and demonstrating any of the four fear-based
reactions (Fight, Flight, Freeze or Facade), you literally become a “Victim of
Circumstances”.
63
Overcoming
Fear-Based Reactions
You cannot overcome fear-based
reactions, pre-actions, or non-survival programs, unless you know they exist.
On the other hand, you will not overcome them, unless you see them as a
problem. Even then, you have to learn how.
The
Definition of Insanity:
“Doing the same thing over and over again,
and expecting different results.”
Attributed
to Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain, and Albert Einstein.
Used by
mystery writer Rita Mae Brown in her novel Sudden
Death.
A
middle-aged woman in a wheelchair told me the story of her crippling injury.
She had been a high school teacher. During a fire drill, it was her job to see
that everyone left the building as quickly as possible. A large student walked
toward her, and she told him he needed to go outside. He said he wanted his
jacket. Since it was not cold, she insisted that he wait to get his coat until
after the drill. The young man became so enraged that he threw her against a
wall of lockers. Not only did this cripple her, but it put the young man in
prison.
Who knows
for sure what caused this non-survival behavior. Perhaps anger helped him to
survive an abusive parent, but there was certainly some reason it developed.
Apparently, he perceived the ability to intimidate people as valuable, even
though it caused grave injury to them and ultimately ruined his life. Violent
people might loathe the consequences of their behavior, but they continue to
react with intense rage because of perceived benefits associated with the
ability to intimidate and control others.
Anger is
not the only way people go about trying to control others. In elementary
school, I recall a girl struggling to answer a question from our teacher.
Instead of answering, she began to tremble and cry. The teacher became visibly
nervous and told her to sit down, where she continued to whimper. I cannot
remember this girl ever being asked another question.
Falling
apart had an immediate benefit for the young girl. She did not have to answer
the question. It also had a long-term benefit. The teacher never called on her
again. Shy people are not stupid. Even if they hate themselves for not speaking
up, they often stay silent because of the inherent value in being able to avoid
ridicule, rejection, or perhaps embarrassment.
These two
young people had something in common with each other. Their fear-based
reactions had become their ways of controlling others. The tough kid
accomplished this with his FIGHT reaction, and the young girl with her FREEZE
reaction.
64
That is
certainly not all. We have all known people who have learned to use the FACADE
reaction to control others with untruths, half-truths, and outright lies.
Almost everyone has encountered people who resort to the FLIGHT reaction
…
people
who quit jobs if they think they are in trouble, or who are always the one to
initiate the break-up of a relationship. The trick, instead of justifying
fear-based reactions, is to overcome them.
Our perceptions of the value of
our fear-based reactions may blind us to the problems they are creating in our
lives. We insist that others should do the changing, while going to great
lengths to justify our own Fight, Flight, Freeze, and Facade reactions … even
when they only serve to make things worse.
Your fear-based reactions usually
do you harm, if only because they give others an excuse to react in turn. So
even when you win you lose. People who back off from your intimidation may
actively work to undermine you to get even. Your shyness may evoke sympathy
from those who care about you, but bosses who think you are too fragile to
handle more responsibility may pass you over for a promotion.
The normal reaction to change is
resistance, even when you see a need to make the change. But it is virtually
impossible to change a behavior when you do not see a need to make the change …
even if it is ruining your life. A classic example is the practicing alcoholic
who says, “Drinking is not my problem. My
crummy job is the problem.”
There are only two ways your life can improve.
1) Everyone else changes how they are treating you.
2) You change how you are treating everyone else.
Becoming
familiar with your own fear-based reactions will not guarantee that you will
overcome them, but it is the first step. However, such awareness is
necessary for you to increase your leadership
effectiveness and thus avoid taking
“The Fear-Based Path of Self-Sabotage” (Page 66).
While you
will find in the coming chapters that the path of The Love-Based
Leader is a terrific alternative, i t is important for you to be clear on knowing “where you are”, before you spend effort striving
to get “where you want to be”. Therefore, I strongly recommend that you spend a
few minutes on the following exercise before you continue on to Part II.
65
The Fear-Based Path of
Self-Sabotage
! React
! !
! !!!!Pre-Act
!
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
Survival |
|
|
|
|||
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
|
|
|
|||||||
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
!!!!Program |
|
|
|
|||||||
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
Non-Survival |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
! |
!Program |
66
EXERCISE #2 - Your Non-Survival
Programs
Non-survival programs, by definition, are
unconscious fear-based behaviors. Changing them is impossible unless you
discover what they are. Here are two ways you can uncover your non-survival
programs:
1)
Have you
ever done something, regretted it — but later did it again? List a few
examples:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
2)
Have you
ever avoided doing something, and regretted it — but when given another chance
avoided it again? List a few examples:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
67
Love-Based
Leadership:
The process of making a positive difference, and inspiring others to do
the same, by maintaining self-control.
68
69
Leadership
based on “Position-Power” is history.
It is
time to stop fighting against what you do not want,
and to
start fighting for what you do want.
There is
a difference.
This is
the essence of Love-Based Leadership.
Its time
has come.
70
CHAPTER 3
Who Wants to WORK
on a Relationship?
For the past 30 years, when
speaking about relationships, I have asked each of my groups
this question ... “Raise your hand if you
know a lot of people who have GREAT
relationships?” I never see very many hands.
To be
certain, many of the people in my audiences have had great relationships
themselves, and most knew at least a few people with great relationships.
Nevertheless, very few knew many others who had them.
Today we
find many competent people are failing to excel, or even to survive in their
personal and professional relationships because they lack “relationship”
skills. They fail because they leave the development and maintenance of
trusting relationships to chance.
Everywhere
I go, people say to me, “We are working on our relationship.” Who wants to “work”
on a relationship? I love to ask them if working on the relationship is what
drew them to each other? Normally, relationships begin because there is joy at
some level. In my experience, relationships begin to deteriorate when they
become “serious”.
Do you
really want to be in a “serious” relationship?
Most
people would rather be right than happy.
The truth
is that seriousness is a “disease”.
Fortunately, it is curable.
We live
in a world where a properly focused person can create virtually anything they
want, perhaps not everything they want, but almost anything is
71
within reach of a committed
individual. Nevertheless, the one thing missing is what people seem to want the
most: A great relationship.
Some
people have great models for personal relationships in their parents, but many
do not. While it is understandable to have difficulty creating great
relationships without a great model, it is not exactly easy to accomplish this
even with a great model. I grew up in one of the happiest households
imaginable, yet my parents divorced after 35 years of marriage. Additionally,
my brother, my sister and I have all been divorced.
Roberta
Rockefeller and Me
I met Roberta Rockefeller while
attending the University of Southern California. We were inseparable. We were
lovers and best friends. Shortly after I graduated, we got married.
Roberta
and I lived in Los Angeles, and each had our own convertible sports car. We had
good jobs, spent a lot of time at the beach, and had many friends. Not only
were Roberta and I on “The Newlywed Game”, we won. We really did have a great
life together.
After
three years of marriage, we decided to have children. Roberta gave birth to
Kelcey, the first of our three daughters. Jancy and Carly followed two and four
years later. I was the proud papa of three beautiful, healthy, intelligent
girls.
We should have been the picture
of joy. However, we were not happy. Roberta had wanted children since she was a
child. Roberta’s feelings for our
daughters were more important
than her need for my friendship. She did not ignore me after they were born; I
simply stopped being her best friend. In retrospect, I do not think my ego ever
allowed me to be anything other than Roberta’s best friend.
I always
had a fear of divorce. My parents had been married for decades, as had Roberta’s.
I actually had made the commitment to never do anything “wrong”. If there were
ever to be a divorce, it would not be my fault. Accordingly, I never had an
affair, never used drugs, and never got drunk. There were no beatings,
expensive hobbies, or gambling. I worked hard, earned a good living, and
provided a nice home for my family. I never did anything wrong (I hope you can
see what is coming).
All
relationships have problems. I, of course, never did anything wrong. Therefore,
who had to be causing all the problems? Correct, Roberta was clearly the
problem. Surely, you can see that? (Yes, this is sarcasm). It still amazes me
that she was able to put up with such self-righteousness for 10 years.
Obviously, she loved me a lot.
Nevertheless,
I became critical, offensive, and judgmental of practically everything Roberta
did, or did not do. I may not have been happy, but it certainly was “not my fault.”
In
retrospect, I try to imagine what it must have been like living with me. I
really cannot.
Finally,
she had had enough. Ours was one of the first “No-Fault” divorces in Illinois.
It only cost a few hundred dollars, and we were only in court for about 15
minutes (at least we did that part right).
72
Roberta
rented a house about 45 minutes away from where I lived. I only saw my
daughters on alternate weekends, a couple of weeks over the summer, plus a few
days over the Christmas holidays. I felt like an uncle.
Residual
resentment from 10 years of marriage, along with current resentments resulting
from being divorced, welled up inside of me. I hated paying child support, and
I loathed hearing good or bad news about my daughters over the phone. Not
surprisingly, I began to resist my divorce and to avoid keeping my commitments
to her and my daughters.
For
example, I would show up a few minutes late every time I picked up the girls.
Then, depending on which would be more inconvenient for Roberta, I would either
drop them off a little early, or a bit late. I would do anything I could to
make her life more difficult.
My
resistance peaked when I began to manipulate the child support payments. I had
agreed to pay child support every week, and of course I continued to never do
anything “wrong” (self-righteousness is a non-survival program). I mailed each
check on a Friday, so it would be post-marked before the deadline, but would
not arrive until Monday or Tuesday. This, of course, was not my fault.
Roberta
finally got really angry with me, so I told her she would get her checks by
Saturday if I had to drive them to her house. I would ruin my own weekend by
driving the check to her home and leaving it stuck in the door about one minute
before midnight (what a jerk I was).
Finally, after
about 18 months of this nonsense, I got it. I really got it. I finally saw what
I was doing. I still remember the feeling as I was writing a child-support
check. I stopped as it hit me. “You know,”
I thought, “this is a lot of money. But, she used to get all of it. Now,
I get to keep most of it.” I smiled, and
everything changed.
Suddenly,
my attitude changed completely.
Life the
way it “is” became better than life the way it “isn’t”.
I even
had the thought, “Besides, if I had to
pay someone to take care of my daughters
as well as Roberta does, I would never be able to afford it. Heck, this is
actually pretty reasonable.”
It was
then that I remembered my commitment to Roberta. When we got married, I made a
promise before God, my family, and our friends to “Love, honor, and cherish”
her “until death do us part.” I had not made that commitment conditionally on how Roberta would treat me. I said I
would cherish Roberta until I died. I swore an oath to that.
I never
realized until that moment, the reason Roberta divorced me was because I
destroyed the trust and the love. I finally realized that I bastardized my own
integrity the first time I criticized her instead of cherishing her (I probably
did that on our wedding day).
73
Over the
years, I gave her countless reasons to distrust me. From Roberta’s perspective,
if I had lied about committing to cherish her “until death do us part,” then
it was certainly possible that I had lied about loving her as well.
Roberta
asked for the divorce, that much is true. However, I was the one who ended our
marriage when I showed I could not be trusted.
I called
Roberta and asked her if it would be OK if I would send her four checks at the
beginning of every month, each post-dated for its respective Saturday. That
way, I explained, she would never have to worry about when they would show up.
She almost fainted. I finally started to see that cherishing Roberta again was
going to be fun.
The
effects of this change on my part were staggering.
I finally
stopped living with resentment.
That
alone was worth my efforts. But when Roberta started encouraging our daughters
to spend more time with me, I actually started to live in joy again.
Then, I
got a lesson I was not expecting. I never realized how my anger for Roberta was
affecting how other women perceived me. Within weeks of changing my attitude
about Roberta, the incredible Christine Gail Lesch entered my life.
My
divorce, which had been my curse, had now become my blessing. Because Roberta
had divorced me, I was now free to create an even better relationship with
someone I would have been too unworthy to even consider dating when I was
younger. Fortunately, for me, Christine and I were married later that same
year.
To see
just how much healing occurred, a few years later when Roberta and Harry Begley
were about to be married, Christine and I were invited to their wedding. That
may be common in some parts of the world (I am kidding), but it is rare in
Chicago.
Harry and
I even posed for a photo to commemorate the last moment that, “Neither one of us are married to Roberta.” However,
what made me most proud is that
Roberta asked my wife Christine to sing at her ceremony. That was pure class.
However,
having a wife and a former wife who get along with each other does create some
interesting moments. Such as the time I heard them trading stories about me,
and laughing hysterically.
Nevertheless,
I would not trade our friendship for anything. Roberta has helped us out of two
financial binds, and she was with my father when he died. Roberta is still one
of my best friends.
I cannot
take credit for our friendship, as we both created that. All I did was stop
resenting, start giving, and allow her to give to me.
My
decision to keep my integrity has inspired numerous seminar participants to
give their marriage a second chance. I have also been told that this story has
helped many people re-create friendships after a bitter break-up ... just as
Roberta and I did.
74
Roberta’s
Response
Shortly after finishing the “Roberta
and Me” section of this chapter, I sent it to Roberta. I wanted to make sure I
was objective and not judgmental. I wanted to make certain it did not cause new
resentments on her part. I was so moved by her response that I asked for, and
received, her permission to include it in the book.
Hi Ross,
I have just finished reading the section about you
and me. I am deeply touched. Thank you. I wouldn’t change a word.
Perhaps someday I’ll share my version of our story
with you. However, I am guessing you already know a lot of it. I will always
love you, and I do cherish you and all that we have shared. Most of all our
friendship and our daughters.
Christine and your children rank high on my list,
too. Not to mention your family.
And then
there are all the memories. I basically grew up with you, most of my memories
include you, and most of the funny stories I tell involve you. I have many “Ross-isms”
that are cherished parts of me.
Most of all, I manage to make
sure that just about everyone I meet, and have an intimate conversation with,
knows that I am blessed to have an exceptional relationship with my first
husband, his wife, their children, and the rest of his family.
Love Roberta
75
RELATING
What is a relationship anyway? A “relationship”
is a noun. Dictionaries describe a relationship as, “a connection, association,
or involvement that people have with other individuals or groups.”
Everyone
has relationships. We have personal relationships, intimate relationships,
family relationships, work relationships, and community relationships. We have
joyful relationships with people we love and difficult relationships with
people we resent. We even have temporary relationships with the other drivers
on the highway, the rest of the audience in a play, and the people who join us
on a flight or in an elevator.
However
brief, the existence of a relationship has nothing to do with its depth,
longevity, quality, or your desire to maintain or improve it. That is up to
you.
Relating,
on the other hand, is what determines the effectiveness of our relationships.
The word “relate” is a verb. It is an action. The dictionary definition of “relate”
is, “to have a friendly or close relationship with another, or others … to be
responsive or sympathetic.”
Do not
try to MAKE a relationship work.
Instead,
simply strive to RELATE.
Stress is
a normal result of personal, intimate, and business relationships. The common
denominator in all of our lives is that we must relate with people when there
are problems and conflicts. So why are we usually able to relate with some
people, but rarely with certain others?
The
answer is directly proportional to the existence of mutual trust. While we
would prefer to relate with people we trust, situations often require us to
relate with people when trust is lacking.
There is
a quandary whenever you decide to trust another person. Regardless of the
potential benefits, you become open to the possibility of being hurt. On the
other hand, when you do not trust, regardless of the hurt you may avoid, you
guarantee lost opportunities for the achievement of desired results that could
have been created, such as success, love, friendship, and self-worth.
It is
easy to create an atmosphere in which you are not trusted. Simply break your
word, show up late, gossip, judge, attack, lie, cheat, or violate confidences
enough times and even profoundly valuable professional and personal
relationships can be ruined. With some people, even one time is enough to break
the trust. Once gone, regaining trust is usually difficult and often
impossible.
In both
business and personal relationships, if you gain an advantage over others by
abusing trust, there is always a cost. Not the least of which is a guarantee
that the advantage cannot be sustained. If your behavior threatens others,
ultimately they will react to you in one of four ways. They will attack you,
leave you, shut you out, lie to you, or some combination thereof. Are any of
these possible negative reactions truly in your best interest?
76
In
business, ethics demand you keep your word to employees, employers, co-workers,
and clients. Regardless of the reasons, if your behavior causes others to lose
trust in you, you lose.
Many
people resist giving when they take a job. Instead of exceeding expectations,
they give just enough to keep from getting fired. This is probably fair, since
these types of people seem to end up working for bosses who only pay their
employees just enough to keep them from quitting. Everyone is worried about
what they are going to get, instead of concentrating on what they have to give.
With so many adversarial relationships, it is no wonder so many businesses are
failing.
The same
is true with personal relationships. Some people get married then seem to look
for excuses to stop giving. They do not mean it when they say, “I promise
to love, honor, and cherish until death do us part.” They might as well just say, “I promise to tolerate you until I feel like killing you.”
You have
probably heard the old saying, “It takes
two people to make a relationship
work.” This is incorrect. It does not take two people to make a relationship work. But it does takes
two to destroy one.
It
actually only takes one person to make a relationship work. Furthermore, you
have always known this. You have just believed it was the “other” one.
Once
people begin to take it personally when something goes wrong, they begin to
resent their partner for the smallest of challenges, and the Reactive Cycle
begins. Once begun, this can be a very difficult thing to stop.
In every
relationship, there exist many Level-1 negative circumstances (Distractions),
such as finding the toilet seat being left up at home, or make-up scattered all
over the counter. Even mild fear-based reactions to these events, such as
arguing and sarcasm, can easily create much bigger problems.
When a
relationship ends, there are always excuses and accusations. Usually, both people
end up claiming the fault lies in the other person. However, neither one ever
seems to blame the real culprit: Their own fear-based reactions to Level-1
Negative Circumstances. These are what really lead most partners to begin
withholding love from each other.
Imagine,
for example, a spouse who consistently leaves the cap off the toothpaste tube.
Instead of allowing a fear-based reaction, a love-based leader makes a
conscious choice to keep their word to “cherish” the growing glob of toothpaste
on their counter. They may also choose to buy a second tube for their own use,
and hide it out of arm’s reach.
The
love-based spouse keeps the promise, “to
love, honor, and cherish until death
do us part,” regardless of the issues and problems. He or she finds a way
to enjoy their partner’s little
quirks. They maintain their integrity and honor their promise to cherish, no
matter what it takes.
Who wants
to “work” on a relationship anyway? True answers will almost always be found
through joy. What “Level -1 Negative Circumstances” generally cause you to
react? What are those negative reactions doing to your relationships?
77
“I Haven’t Spoken To My Mother In 20 years.”
It was Sunday of another
LifeStream Basic Seminar. The breakthroughs and insights were typically
profound. “Joan” came to the front of the room and shared, “I haven’t spoken to my mother in 20 years.”
She and
her mother had fought over how she was raising her children. It was a bitter
argument. Joan was so tired of fighting she finally told her mother, “I never
want to speak to you again.”
My father
asked Joan what she wanted. Her response was simple. “I want my mother back.”
He told Joan, “Go
call her.”
While
everyone else took a break, I accompanied her to the pay phones. Joan was
shaking so severely she could barely dial the phone. It took a few minutes to
connect, but when I heard the words, “Mother
it’s me, Joan.” I stepped away to give her privacy. She was already
sobbing.
Later,
when Joan returned to the room, it was clear she was excited. Her smile went
practically from ear to ear. Joan shared with us that she and her mother had
cried together for the last 25 minutes, and had shared regret and longing which
both had been carrying for years. Joan had made a commitment to visit her
mother the following weekend. She was glowing.
About 20
other people were so moved by Joan, that they all called their parents or
children during that lunch break. It was an inspiring afternoon. Joan’s courage
affected people she would never meet. It was a terrific example of the impact
of The Love-Based Leader in action.
Later,
Joan told us about the wonderful weekend she and her mother had shared. They
visited, shopped, and toured Indianapolis together. One time they began crying and
hugging while crossing the street. The light changed during their hug and a
police officer actually had to move them to the curb. It must have been like a
scene from a movie.
Several
days later, her mother was killed in an automobile accident. I saw Joan before
she left for the funeral. I was amazed. She was completely at peace. Joan told
me that, had she not reconciled with her mother, the accident would have
probably killed her as well. Now, she could let her mother go. At the funeral,
Joan re-connected with a few other long-lost relatives. Today, she no longer
lives in isolation.
Who Have You Lost Touch With?
This Is A Wonderful Opportunity For You
To
Experience Love-Based Leadership.
78
Giving
Unconditionally
Throughout history, only a
handful of people have spent their lives giving love unconditionally ... giving
without a thought of anything in return. Unfortunately, once you get past
people such as Jesus Christ, Mahatma Gandhi, Mother Teresa, Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr., Dr Albert Schweitzer and a few others, the list drops off rather
quickly.
Most of
us are not so good at giving unconditionally. We typically give with conditions
...
Conditional
Giving
At Home
“I’ll love you IF you love me back.” “I’ll love you
UNLESS you fool around.” “I’ll love you UNTIL you hurt me.”
At Work
“I’ll work hard IF you give me a raise.”
“I won’t quit UNLESS you take advantage of me.”
“I’ll be
loyal UNTIL you stop promoting me.”
Then,
when the other person does not meet your conditions, you have justification to
withhold your love in a relationship, or your passion at work. When your giving
is done “conditionally”, it is really not giving at all. It is actually an
attempt to manipulate or control others, and it is exhausting.
Giving,
true unconditional giving, is energizing. If you really want inner peace,
quality relationships, and a successful career, quit focusing on what you are
going to get. Instead focus on what you are going to give.
When I
make that statement in my seminars, I often hear someone remark “I gave
until I was used up,” or “I gave
until I could give no more.” These are well-worn justifications for giving
up on a relationship or a job. These and other similar comments indicate that
it was the giving that drained the individual. This is untrue, and I can prove
it.
79
Think
back to a time when you were shopping for a gift for a dear friend, and you
found the perfect gift. You know, the kind of gift that was so perfect, you
could not wait to see the expression on the face of the receiver?
You took
it home and wrapped it with feelings of joy and anticipation. Then, when the
gifts were being opened, you casually kept pushing it back out of the way until
it was the last gift. Remember how you felt as you commented, “Oh, here is one more gift.” Your smile was so big your friend knew
something was up, and perhaps even
looked at you and said, “OK, what are you
up to?” as they opened their gift.
Now
recall the gasp, scream, or laugh when your friend opened the package and said, “Where did you find this, I can’t believe
it. It’s just perfect!” Rather than being drained or exhausted, you were
energized, weren’t you? You were smiling, laughing, crying, hugging, joyful,
and excited. Giving always creates energy.
Years
later, long after you forgot what you received that day, you still remember the
moment he or she opened your gift. You have always known the truth: The gift is
in the giving.
“It isn’t what you do, it’s how much love you put
in the doing. It isn’t what you give, it’s how much love you put in the giving.”
Mother Teresa
Mother
Teresa created peace and joy in Calcutta. You and I have created turmoil at
birthday parties and vacations. The question is, could we do better?
All of us
have experienced giving or receiving unconditional love. Granted, some of us
have experienced more than others, but we have all experienced at least some.
“Love in your heart wasn’t put there to stay. Love
isn’t love until you give it away” Unknown
In your
career, have you ever screwed up, but been given a second chance? Perhaps you
forgave a friend for hurting you not because they treated you badly, but in
spite of that fact. Maybe a fatigued parent chose to stay up all night caring
for you when you were sick, despite needing sleep.
80
EXERCISE
#3 - The Highest Blessing
Most people are familiar with this quote from the
Bible. “It is more blessed to give than to receive.” (Acts 20:35)
QUESTION:
If it really is, “more blessed to give than to receive,” then what is the highest
thing you can do for another human being?
ANSWER:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
<<
PLEASE: ANSWER BEFORE CONTINUING … NO CHEATING!!
>>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
81
When
asked the question, “If it really is more
blessed to give than to receive, then
what is the highest thing you can do for another human being?” most people answer by saying, “Give to them.” Some say, “Give them love.” Typically, I need to
ask the question several times before someone gets it.
QUESTION:
If it really is “more blessed to give than to receive”
what is the highest thing you can do for another
human being?
ANSWER:
Allow them to GIVE to YOU.
Allow others to have that “Highest Blessing”.
Let other
people have the highest blessing. It does not mean to take from them. It means
to simply allow them to give to you.
When your
5-year old offers to make your bed, let her do so to the best of her ability.
Then, praise her for helping. Even if it is done all wrong, do not belittle her
or even correct her. Take pictures of your “imperfectly” made bed and stick
them on the refrigerator. Put a big note under the photo that says something
like, “Kelly did this for me today.”
When we
do not let others give to us, we take away the opportunity for them to receive
the highest blessing. Perhaps you worry about what others might think of you,
and that it may appear that you are too weak to handle a problem yourself.
Maybe you just do not want to be a burden. Or, it just might be when you are
too busy, and you simply decide to do something yourself because it would take
longer just to tell someone else how to do it.
To become
a love-based leader when challenged or threatened, you need to take a different
approach. When you are hurting and someone asks if something is wrong … tell
them. When someone asks if they can help you with something, let them. Sharing
with others and letting others give to you does not mean you are weak, unless
you become a taker. If you do that, you will become your own worst enemy.
A
love-based leader is never a taker. Additionally, a love-based leader is not
only a giver, but an inspiration to get others to give at home, at work, at
church, in the community, and even globally.
82
The Man
and The Wood Stove
Imagine a man freezing in an old
log cabin during a blizzard. Holding an armload of wood and standing before a
cold wood-stove, he shouts, “Stove, I’ll
give you wood just as soon as you
give me heat.” Then he just stands there, freezing to death. Holding on to the one thing that will save him.
When you
wait to give, until your boss gives you a promotion or your spouse gives you
love, just as that man in the cabin, you freeze to death.
Quit
focusing on what you are going to get. Instead, focus on what you have to give.
Remember, a love-based leader creates great relationships by suspending
judgment and giving value.
Captain Dan and Laura
In 1980,
we were conducting our LifeStream Basic Seminar near Chicago. My father was the
facilitator and I was the class coordinator. I expected a typical weekend of
insights, breakthroughs, and commitments. What I got, however, was anything but
typical.
Thursday
evening began normally, with about 50 attendees introducing themselves and
stating their objectives for the weekend. We knew something unique was
occurring when Margaret introduced herself and her six children.
By
itself, someone attending with their children was not unusual. Attending with
six of them was definitely unique. The only family member missing was Margaret’s
husband, Dan, who was a captain in the Chicago Police Department. He wanted
nothing to do with LifeStream.
Sixteen
year-old Laura, the youngest, was the only one of the children who was not
there by choice. Margaret made her to come to the seminar. She had even told
Laura the classic line, “This is for your
own good.” This usually does not bode well, as classes like LifeStream are
generally far more effective when participants choose to be there.
The first
day must have seemed like hell for Laura. She resented being forced to come,
and resisted any possibility of actually learning anything.
Nevertheless, little by little,
Laura’s resistance melted. By Friday evening, her exuberance, depth, and
honesty had turned her into one of the leaders of the class.
Then,
late Friday evening, there was a disturbance at the door. I investigated and
encountered a uniformed Chicago police officer. Yes, this was her father ...
Captain Dan.
Captain
Dan demanded I take his family out of the class so he could take them home.
From my previous experiences with Margaret, I knew he had a quick temper and
that he was a heavy drinker. My fear-based reaction was to comply immediately
(Facade), even though I wanted them to stay.
Captain
Dan was an imposing presence. He was in his uniform, and he had his gun. It was
not drawn, and there was no indication that it might be, but I could not have
been more threatened if he had pointed it at me.
I grew up
in Southern California. My only experiences with Chicago police were news
reports of the 1968 Democratic convention riots. This man did not just
intimidate me. He terrified me.
83
I have no
sense of smell, and could not determine if he had been drinking. Since I knew
he liked to drink, as far as I was concerned he was drunk. I was unprepared to
deal with an angry and potentially intoxicated cop with a gun. I just wanted
him to leave, and I would have immediately taken his family out of the class to
accomplish this.
But, when
I informed Margaret of the situation, she told me they would not leave. The
kids all agreed. My father shared the problem with the rest of the class, who
were all very supportive of this decision.
I felt
this was a threatening and possibly dangerous response. As the messenger, I did
not relish telling Captain Dan that his family was refusing to leave the
seminar. I was not trained on how to handle a possibly drunk Chicago police
captain with a gun, especially one perceiving me as holding his family hostage.
I began to question my career choice.
Amazingly,
there was a police captain from a different police department in that class. Captain
Emil offered to tell Captain Dan that his family did not wish to leave the
class. Unlike me, Captain Emil was trained on how to handle such situations. It
was this ability, plus the peer pressure he exerted as a brother police
captain, which enabled him to diffuse this conceivably dangerous scenario.
When
Captain Emil returned to the room, he invited Margaret and her kids to be
guests in his home for the remainder of the weekend. He felt in this way they
could finish the seminar without having to deal with probable turmoil at home.
They readily accepted.
Captain
Dan had gone. Margaret and her children had a place to stay for the weekend. I
was relieved until I looked at Laura.
Laura was
sitting with her arms and legs tightly crossed, sobbing. She was practically in
a fetal position. Her father had disrupted the seminar she was beginning to
enjoy. I was quite worried for her.
“Laura,” I asked. “Are
you OK?” I will never forget her answer.
Laura
looked at me and said, “These people will
never know what a beautiful man he
is.” I was awed. With this attitude, I knew I could work with her.
“Please, help me get my father to take LifeStream,”
she continued. “He needs this so much.”
I was
trying to be sympathetic, but I honestly did not want him in class. I never
wanted to see Captain Dan again, not ever. “Laura,”
I responded, “I don’t think that’s possible.” I did not want
to get her hopes up. In my own fear-based
way, I was trying to be helpful.
Laura
looked up and replied, “This class has
taught me I can do anything I set my
mind to accomplish. Don’t you believe I can reach him?”
Thinking
it would be a good idea to validate what Laura had been learning, I did a quick
reversal. I told her it would not be easy, but she could get her father to take
LifeStream. Even though I personally did not want Captain Dan in class, I gave
Laura my best shot at a plan to reach him.
“I’ll do
anything. What do I need to do?” She
responded.
“First,” I began, “close your eyes and imagine your father in
the LifeStream Basic Seminar. See him talking with the other students,
listening to the lectures, and participating in the class. See him
demonstrating the beauty you know he has. Imagine how people are responding to
him.”
“Now, pretend the class is over,” I
continued. “It is Sunday night. How would
he be acting? See that beautiful man. See how people are looking at him. How
84
would that make you feel?”
Laura’s
eyes opened and swelled with tears of joy. She said it would be the most
wonderful thing in the world. “Good,”
I said, “that is all you need to do. Create this visualization before you go to
bed every night, and re-create the feeling you just experienced. Will you do
that Laura ... every night?”
“Yes,” was all she said.
“That is the easy part,” I continued. “Here
is the hard part. From now on, you are to pretend your visualizations from the
night before are not your imagination, but rather a memory of a real event. I
want you to begin treating your father as if he has already taken the class.”
“Essentially,” I said, “You are going to play a
mind game with yourself. You will need to demonstrate the same feelings of
relief, joy, honor, and gratitude that you know you will have when he actually
completes the LifeStream class, but you will need to do it in advance.”
“One more thing,” I told her. “You
are not to ask your father to take LifeStream. Your mother has already tried to
get him to take the class for months, and it has not worked. You have to treat
your father with love until he sees the need to take the class for his reasons,
not yours. Can you do that?”
“I will,” she
responded. After a short pause, Laura asked,
“How long will I have to do this?”
“Until he
does the class,” I
answered.
Laura thought about this for a few seconds. “OK”, was all she said.
“Your life works in direct proportion
to the commitments you make and keep.”
James H. Quinn
I figured
it was unlikely this girl would voluntarily imagine her father attending the
class every night, much less re-create these deep feelings on a daily basis. I
figured that Laura would try it for a few days, give up, and then I would be
off the hook.
I was
safe. I would not have to deal with having Captain Dan in class. I would also
be able to tell Laura the only reason it did not work was because she quit. It
was the perfect plan.
However,
I was about to learn the impact of a love-based leader. Laura kept her
commitment. Every night she re-created the feelings of her father in class.
More importantly, she demonstrated love-based leadership on a daily basis. She
was determined to be excited, focused, and accepting of her father regardless
of his reactions.
It took
Laura about two months, and Captain Dan actually took the LifeStream Basic
Seminar. Everything she wanted happened. The people in his class were blown
away. Her father really touched the other students. More importantly, a
dysfunctional family began to treat each other with love.
85
It is
virtually impossible to resist the love-based leadership of someone you care
about.
If Laura
had been less committed, she would have given up long before she reached her
father. As a result of her unshakable commitment, Captain Dan and the other
students in his class all benefited from Laura’s love-based leadership. So did
her mother, sisters, brother and thousands of my students who have heard about
their story.
I also
benefited from Laura’s love-based leadership. Captain Dan and I became friends.
He took me ice-sailing on Lake Geneva and treated me to a Chicago Bears
football game. I took him to a USC vs. Notre Dame football game. We became
quite close.
When
Captain Dan retired from the police force a few years later, other than family,
I was one of the only “civilians” invited to the party. This is not how I would
have imagined our relationship when we first met. I finally knew what my father
meant when he told me to “look deeper”
when I made judgments of people I did not understand.
Captain
Dan -- The Rest of The Story
I wanted to be sure I had gotten
this story as close as possible to the original events, so I sent the first
draft to Captain Dan’s oldest daughter, Danielle. She sent the following email,
which provided me with deeper insights into the man who, at my first encounter,
I thought was drunk and willing to use deadly force.
Dear Ross,
As you know my dad was a pretty
amazing guy. Laura and I have always tended to think of our father as a
beautiful man for very different reasons. I focused on his “strength.” Laura,
on the other hand, was the only sibling to engender “kinder” behaviors from
him.
While intimidation is a
consciousness I never had to contemplate, it was an attitude with which my dad
was expert. He fostered it. My father knew if he wanted to be good at what he
did, and in order to not have to be violent, he had to develop it.
As a direct result, my father
became the youngest sergeant in Chicago history. In fact, dad was leading men
during riots when he was only 25 years old.
It is not surprising he
intimidated you at your first meeting. But I feel you had very little to worry
about. He had that gun out of its holster I think only twice in his entire
career, and I only know of one time that he brandished it at someone. My dad
thought of the “gun” as part of the tools of his trade, not as a weapon. It was
certainly not something to be taken out in a situation like LifeStream.
86
Even while being a challenging father, my dad was
doing things in the world that probably saved many lives. He was in every major
riot in Chicago from 1960 to 1985. Not one of his people was indicted following
the Democratic Convention. This is because he was with them and, unlike many
other senior officers, he told them what they could and could not do.
One of my early memories was when
Dailey Sr. gave the “shoot to kill” order for looters. My dad was on the street
that night, and a young man was running down the street with a television on
his shoulder. My dad took out his gun, and then said to himself “I’ll be damned if I am going
to shoot
someone over a television set,” and put
his gun away. At that instant, a
bullet missed his head by about 6 inches.
When my father explained “why” he
did what he did, I understood that the core of his understanding was that he
was empowered by the people as a peace officer. That was his guiding principle.
My father understood civil
liberty better than anyone I have ever met. He took his authority from the law
and from the people who paid his salary. There are not many who naturally
foster the level of intestinal fortitude my dad did. I see a combination of a
mental fearlessness and a personal commitment to “my word, that which I speak
into the world.”
Having that sort of personal
integrity has always been amazing to me and I don’t encounter it often, still.
I firmly believe my father lived as long as he did, because he did your
training. I know for sure it is the reason that he had “any” relationship with
his children during the years preceding his passing. We wouldn’t have been able
to “get over” our history as well, without LifeStream.
While we have had our struggles and more, people
have constantly commented on how close my family is. We cooperate in a way I
think many families never do, and truly approach each other with deep respect.
Not a week goes by that I don’t
consciously use something that I learned from participating in your seminars.
Now, 28 years later, it is still the most profound experience of my life.
Love and Light Always,
Danielle
87
The Widow
John and Mary lived the kind of
relationship few of us have realized. They were in college when they first met.
It was not a “love-at-first-sight” fairy tale. In fact, Mary’s first impression
of John was that he was obnoxious. John thought Mary was attractive, but
stuck-up.
Because
theirs was a small college, it was not uncommon for them to bump into each
other. They were always cordial, but certainly not overly friendly with each
other.
However,
Mary’s younger sister, Nancy, thought they would make a great couple. Nancy
tried to arrange meetings between them. She was unsuccessful at several
attempts, but finally struck gold.
Nancy
bought two tickets to a Chicago Cubs game, and asked John if he would like to
go. John was not particularly interested in Nancy, but being a Cubs fan he
naturally accepted the invitation.
Nancy
knew that her sister was a rabid Cubs fan. On the day of the game Nancy
pretended to be sick and asked Mary to take her place at the game. Mary
actually accused her sister of faking in order to finally get her and John on a
date. It took several sickly denials but Mary relented and accepted the ticket.
After all, she thought, “Everybody is a
little obnoxious at a baseball game. How bad could it be to go with John?” Actually, pretty bad.
John
refused to pay for a high priced parking spot near Wrigley Field, and by the
time he finally found a spot the game was underway. The long walk meant that it
was well into the second inning before they found their seats.
Mary was
not happy. She was irritated that they had missed seeing the Cubs score in the
bottom of the first inning. The situation did not improve when the Dodgers
scored in each of the next few innings to take a commanding lead.
Trying to
set things right, John went to get some hotdogs and beer. On his way up the
stairs with the food, some kids bumped into John, causing him to spill
everything all over himself.
Standing
a couple of feet away from Mary, he ran his finger through the mustard and beer
covering his shirt and put it in his mouth. Looking directly at her, John
smiled and said, “It’s delicious. Want a
taste?”
That is
when it began. Mary thought John would explode with anger when the food was
flung all over his clothing. Instead, she saw a confident humor that really
stated, “This is no big deal. I might as
well have some fun.”
In short,
John melted Mary’s icy barrier and she burst out laughing. After that, John and
Mary had a ball. They began by sharing their favorite Cubs stories, and ended
up the day agreeing to go out on a real date. Two years later, they were
married.
Over the
years, John and Mary experienced all of the events that can adversely affect
marriages: children, job problems, money problems, religious differences, and
parental interference. But each challenge only served to make them closer and
more supportive of each other.
They
rarely disagreed and never fought. Even though Mary tended towards the
appropriate side, John’s antics only brought her joy. Then the unthinkable
happened.
88
Not long
after their 46th anniversary, a drunk driver killed John. Somehow,
with the help of her family, Mary managed to move her body through the ritual
of John’s funeral.
All most
people could do when they approached her was to hug and say, “I’m so
sorry Mary. If you need anything, anything at all, please just call.”
Mary would politely say, “Thank you, I will. Thanks for coming.”
As I
watched these exchanges, a thought came over me. The statement, “If you
need anything, please just call,” has to be one of the safest offers of all
time. The one thing most people in a
similar situation are almost certain not to do, is call.
Over the
next few weeks, people dropped by her house with casseroles and gifts. Little
by little the attention waned, and Mary went into a world of survival and
coping. But, her light slowly went out. Coping was not “living”.
It was
Nancy who saw that something had to be done. She tried taking her sister out to
dinner, and inviting her over to play cards. Nothing worked. Finally, she got
an idea.
A few
weeks after the funeral, she made Mary a nice meal and took it to her home.
Upon arrival Nancy said, “Hi Hon, I just
brought you a little something to freeze
for a day when you don’t want to cook.”
Then, in the kitchen as they made
room for it in the freezer Nancy asked her sister, “Could you do me a big favor? My church is having a bake sale and it
would be a huge help if you could make a
couple of dozen cookies for me to sell.” Mary was still overwhelmed with
grief and was withdrawing from life. There was not a chance she would ever ask
for help of any kind. However, the one thing she could not do was to refuse the
request of someone else who needed her help,
especially her sister. She said yes.
“Givers Gain, and Takers Lose”
Unknown
This was
the new beginning for Mary. After baking the cookies, and getting out of the
house to deliver them to Nancy’s church, she started visiting friends, going to
movies, and even joined her sister’s church. Soon, she was one of its most
reliable volunteers. She never stopped grieving her loss of John, but she
stopped letting the grief imprison her.
It is
more blessed to give than to receive. Nancy’s leadership created the space for
Mary to experience some blessings at this traumatic time in her life, by
choosing to give. The alternative of falling into a deep Freeze reaction never
really took hold.
Love-based
leadership really breaks down to just two things. Choose to be a giver, and
inspire others to become givers.
89
Your
Urges and Reasons to React,
Cancel
Your Ability to Give
90
EXERCISE #4 - Choosing To Give
1)
Describe
a time when another person gave to you, even though you had hurt their
feelings. Perhaps a friend helped you to change apartments, even though you had
forgotten his or her birthday.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
2)
Describe
a time when you gave to another person, even though they had hurt your
feelings. Perhaps a partner was critical of you, and then needed a favor.
Instead of withholding because of your resentment for being hurt, you instead
chose to let it go and help him or her out.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
3)
Describe
a current negative circumstance that is causing you to feel resentment for, and
to withhold your gifts from, a person you care about. Now game-plan a
love-based strategy for giving your gifts to that person.
(Suggestion:
Start small)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
91
The
Love-Based Leader in Business
It has been calculated that 80%
of the results in business are created by only 20% of the people.
______________________________________________
Successful 20th Century Position-Power Fear-Based Leaders
had the ability to attract, train, develop, and retain those in the top 20%.
______________________________________________
Successful 21st Century Love Based Leaders will have the
ability to attract, train, develop, and retain those in the top 20% ...
who will then duplicate
themselves by inspiring these people to attract, train, develop, and retain
those in the top 20% ...
who will then duplicate
themselves by inspiring these people to attract, train, develop, and retain
those in the top 20% ...
etc ... etc ... etc ...
______________________________________________
Traditional Position-Power Fear-Based Leaders
created Fear-Based Followers.
Successful 21st Century Love-Based Leaders will
create Love-Based Leaders.
92
CHAPTER 4
Love-Based Leadership?
In Business?
When I
first introduced the concept of love-based leadership in a business seminar, one of the reactions was, “Love-Based Leader? In business? There is no
love in business!” I was reminded of
Tom Hanks in “A League of Their Own” when
he said, “Are you crying? There’s no
crying in baseball.” Nevertheless, many baseball players have cried during
a game. Even tough guy Pete Rose cried on the field.
Just as there is crying in
baseball, there is love in business. I always felt fortunate when I had a job
that I loved. Whenever I was in a sales position, if I made a sale I really
loved my new client. Any time I was promoted to a higher-paying job, I always
loved it. Several of my clients, and many former co-workers, have become close
friends with whom genuine love and affection continue.
I could
go on. But Kahlil Gibran (The Prophet) describes the concept more eloquently.
He said, “My work is my love made
visible.”
My mother
was fortunate to have been able to spend time with Mother Teresa. While at
lunch, she asked her, “Mother, what does
prayer mean to you?” Interestingly, Mother Teresa’s answer was somewhat
similar to Gibran’s:
“Prayer is work in action, and work in action is
prayer.”
Mother Teresa
Most
people did not see Mother Teresa as a businesswoman. But do not doubt it for a
second. She was the head of a global organization, The Sisters of Charity,
which still depends solely on contributions inspired by Mother Teresa.
It is important to realize that
when we truly love our work, we are giving love. You do not have to be Mother
Teresa to give love in your vocation. You can
93
heal and bring joy to others with
a cup of coffee and a kind word, or by mending broken fences. Providing goods
and services that others need to thrive or survive is in itself a form of love.
Much of
the giving in the business world is Fear-Based:
“I’ll work harder if I get a raise.”
“If I don’t prospect for new clients, I’ll lose my
job.”
“I’m not going to support her project,
because that will put her ahead of me for a
promotion.”
“He didn’t help me when I was behind schedule,
so I’m not going to help him now.”
The
business and educational segments of our society have done a remarkable job in
the development and teaching of job skills, or task skills. As a result, huge
numbers of people are generally competent at their jobs. Corporations are
filled with people who know what to do and how to do it, yet job
dissatisfaction and high rates of employee turnover are rampant.
Love-based
leadership requires a higher standard, a change in thinking. The businesses
that will succeed in the 21st Century will not have the luxury of depending on
position-power fear-based personnel, who simply react negatively to problems
such as low-productivity, off-shore competition, new government regulations, and
office dramas.
The
successful companies will be the ones that attract, train, develop, and retain
quality personnel who are love-based leaders. These are the people who will
create the profitability that will enable the company to attract an increasing
stream of love-based leaders.
Fear-Based
Reacting is a habit.
Love-Based
Leadership can also become a habit.
Start
small.
Build
your competency as a Love-Based Leader.
94
Pro-Act
The alternative to reacting to a
problem, or pre-acting to the possibility of a problem, is not necessarily easy
to do. However, it is simple. You simply notice how you are reacting or
pre-acting, and, then choose to do something different. Almost anything would
be an improvement, but conscious decisions to implement a love-based solution
will prove most effective. Later in the book, we will explore four positive
alternatives to the four fear-based reactions.
Unfortunately,
because we have been so thoroughly conditioned to be reactive, there is not
even a word for the opposite of “react” in the dictionary. The closest you
could find was “act”, which implies a phony or artificial response. However, a
word has been coined which does work. Instead of reacting, we can now choose to
“Pro-Act”.
To Pro-Act is to become a Professional at Living.
Instead
of a “do as I say, not as I do”
approach, pro-acting is the demonstration of the alternatives you would choose
to have others implement, regardless of negative circumstances or hurt
feelings.
Because
love-based leaders are pro-active, they tend to prevent and solve problems. At
the very least, pro-active love-based responses will keep a difficult situation
from escalating into something much worse.
Imagine a
scenario in which you are attacked while walking down the street to catch a bus
to work. You are punched violently and knocked to the ground. Your attacker
then jumps on your chest and strikes your face while swearing at you and
spitting. It is painful, insulting, and disgusting. You have never seen this
person before, and have no clue as to why this is happening. How would you
react?
Depending
on the size of the threat, your abilities, and your training, you might fight
back or run away. Otherwise, if you could not get away, you could yell for help
and cover-up to reduce the damage. You might even try to talk the person into
stopping by telling him what you think he wants to hear. Fight, Flight, Freeze,
or Facade. Because you are angry, frantic, confused, or scared, you could
employ one or more fear-based reactions to protect yourself.
Now
imagine a second scenario. You are walking down the street and hear the
squealing of brakes. You turn and observe a car striking a pedestrian. He
literally flies through the air and lands at your feet. Blood is spurting from
his arm, where a bone is protruding.
You
become pro-active as you bend down to help the man, but in his delirium, he
strikes you harder than the previous attack. This man is also swearing and
spitting as he continues to hit you. It is as painful as the first example, but
with more swearing and saliva. Blood is ruining your clothing.
95
With even
more negativity than the previous circumstance, how would you react? Would you
react the same way as the first example? If you bent down to help the person
and were hit, would you stand up, kick them, and leave in anger? Of course not.
You would remain pro-active.
You might
wrap the wound in your good shirt, even while blocking the punches. If a drunk
offered to help, you would keep him away. If an ambulance showed up you would
turn the man over to them in a heartbeat. You would be determined, careful, and
open for help. You would be an effective leader even while enduring pain, spit,
fear, and insults. You would do so even if you had been depressed all morning.
There is
only one difference between the two examples. In the second example, you could
see “why” you were being hurt. Because of this you did not take the “attacks”
personally, and you were able to maintain self-control.
When
operating as a fear-based reactor, you are more concerned with your problems
than with your destination, and your life then becomes the effect of your
circumstances. Much as the automatic-pilot on an airplane, you only react to
outside forces. Thinking is not required.
On the
other hand, when operating as a love-based leader, you are more concerned with
your destination than your problems, and your life becomes the cause of your
solutions ... in spite of your circumstances. A live pilot can make choices to
fly above, around, or through turbulence to arrive safely at the desired
destination. Thinking is required.
The
Restaurant Manager
The following letter regards a
serious business problem, and a solution. It is a true story of a breach of
trust. Do not simply read the letter. Imagine yourself as each of these people,
and ask yourself how you would have acted had you been in their place.
Read
carefully, and read between the lines. You will see all four fear-based
reactions. Yet it only took one love-based leader to inspire a love-based
solution.
Dear Ross,
I want you to know that today you’ve made a
difference in my brother’s life, and he hasn’t even met you. Here is what
happened.
My
brother owns a restaurant in Texas. Two weeks ago he discovered money was
missing from a deposit. He suspected that it was taken by his long-time manager
... a valuable employee who knew the business inside and out.
He asked the manager if he had
any idea what happened. The manager said, “I
won’t lie to you. I took it. I planned to pay it right back, but it took longer than I thought. I’m sorry.”
96
My brother’s policy on this stuff
is clear. You fire the guy, no matter what. We spoke on the phone the day it
happened. I suggested to my brother a revolutionary concept. Instead of making
a fear-based decision, I challenged him to find a creative win-win solution. I
gave him an alternative to firing this man, but I got off the phone thinking my
words had fallen onto deaf ears.
Two hours later my brother called
back. The man and his wife had come to my brother’s office with a check from
his parents for the entire sum.
During the ensuing discussion,
his manager had told him that he took the money to pay for his daughter’s doctor
bill. He knew he was losing his job. He just wanted to make it right.
My brother told me that before I
told him about acting out of love instead of fear, he would never have
considered keeping this man on. It would not have mattered how loyal he’d been,
or how compelling the circumstances.
To make a long story short, my
brother did not fire him. He put the man on probation, and demoted him to a
position where he won’t handle money, but will be able to earn a living. My
brother then gave him part of the money he’d taken as an advance on his salary
(since he knew things were tight).
From what I know about this
situation, and how my brother dealt with it, I believe he took a potentially
tragic episode and turned it into a wonderful opportunity. This man might well
become the most loyal, devoted employee my brother will ever know, just because
someone was willing to take a chance on him.
For one moment my brother ran his
company with wisdom and compassion, not fear. Even that one moment is a
tremendous gift.
So Ross, here is how you made the
difference. First, I didn’t even know the words “Fear-Based” reacting until you
taught them to me.
Second, I would never have
suggested a love-based approach to anyone in my family (even if I knew it was
the right thing), simply out of fear they would reject me. Because of that, my
brother touched his manager.
That man has a job this Christmas
because I had the courage to risk rejection for something important, and
because my brother had the courage to think “outside the box.” Who knows whom
his manager will touch because of all of this?
As for me, I’m willing to keep
risking for what I believe in. Thank you for showing me that I could make a
difference.
Merry Christmas,
Love (name withheld by request)
97
The
Win-Win Principle
Increasingly, successful
organizations are defined by their effectiveness in aligning human resources
with corporate objectives. The biggest business winners in the 21st Century
will be corporations run by love-based leaders, who operate their companies in
accordance with the “Win-Win” principle.
I cannot win, and sustain it ... unless you also
win.
You cannot win, and sustain it ... unless I also
win.
While this concept is well known,
it seems poorly understood and often undervalued in the modern corporate
culture. As an employer, you may think you are succeeding when you get more
than you give to your employees.
If you
are a smart employer, you have hired smart employees. Such people know when
they are being taken advantage of. Ultimately, they will react to you. You will
lose your best people. They will either quit or hold back. Either way, you and
your company stand to lose out.
As an
employee, you might feel you are getting away with something by leaning on
another person or for getting paid for more than you are giving to your
employer. At best, you will fail to achieve your potential. At worst, you could
be overlooked for promotions or even fired.
By
adhering to the “Win-Win” principle, love-based leaders rise to the top. As
employees, these people give more than they expect in return. They arrive early
and stay late. These people ask, “What
can I do to help take this company to the top?”
These
love-based leaders avoid vengeful or counter-productive behaviors, choosing
instead to take actions that are aligned with the goals and objectives of the
organization. They do so even when they feel threatened or even attacked by
colleagues. Often, these leaders spend their own time studying the industry and
the competition, and then freely share ideas that they feel will improve their
company.
In sales,
love-based leaders make sure their customers get what they want, when they want
it, while providing service in every way possible … and are continually looking
for ways to provide added value. Commitments are completed earlier and better
than expected, and the client always gets more than they paid for.
In
management, love-based leaders take care of their employees. They do not play
politics. They ethically reward and promote the effective employees who
continually do the right thing for the organization. These managers give
positive and non-judgmental feedback when their employees make a mistake.
Effective
love-based managers know that their professional success depends on the success
of every member of their team. Those who really desire to succeed will inspire
their people to discover reasons to become love-based leaders.
98
If you are working for an
organization that does not follow this principle, you are not helpless. You
have the same 3 choices as “George” (Chapter 2) …
1) Change
the company from the inside.
2) Get a job
with a company that recognizes and rewards value.
3) Start
your own company.
In the
workplace, because almost everyone has his or her own agenda, people’s needs,
desires, and personalities often conflict. It might be nice to think of having
a magic wand you could wave over everyone to bring instant harmony and accord,
but the reality is that there will occasionally be adversity in even the best
of families and corporations.
Nevertheless,
your fear-based reactive efforts to take responsibility for changing anyone
else’s negative, non-productive, or destructive behaviors will be just about as
effective as their attempts would be to change yours. Resistance, resentment,
and revenge are the only likely results.
People may be ignorant of their
own shortcomings, but they are not stupid. They have their own reasons for
their fear-based behaviors. They will not change them for your reasons.
No matter
how justified they seem, “eye-for-an-eye”
reactions, or “bury your head in the sand” solutions only set the
stage for the Reactive Cycle, which cannot
work in the long run. The only sustainable answer is to identify and overcome
your own fear-based reactions by becoming a love-based leader.
The
Business World Is Changing
The vast majority of the world’s
largest corporations in 1900 are no longer in business. The Fortune 500 list
from just 20 years ago only slightly resembles today’s list, and it is changing
even as you read this chapter. Current and past achievements do not equate with
future successes.
Over the
last century, the premise in the business world
has often
reflected two basic principles:
1)
The leaders of a company needed
to have a clear vision and a strategic plan for its achievement.
2)
Management’s job was the
successful implementation of that plan through the fear-based
motivation, manipulation, and control of its employees and staff.
99
Nevertheless,
despite the overwhelming emphasis on this old structure, fear-based management
techniques are rapidly losing effectiveness. Globalization, the Internet, and
increasing political, social, and competitive pressures are having a dramatic
effect upon the business culture in America, and everywhere else.
Not only
are an ever-increasing number of people not operating in alignment with
corporate strategic plans, there is an increasing problem with staff turnover
and employee dissatisfaction. As a result, more and more top-level people are
leaving to work for competitors, or to start their own businesses.
The
problem (and opportunity) is that the average employee has easy access to more
knowledge and information than an entire corporation could obtain in the 1960’s.
Additionally, far more employees are trained to be much more creative than in
the past. As a result, they often have their own agenda of what is needed for
the company.
When this
occurs, not only does it frustrate the employee, it can place the employee out
of alignment with corporate strategy. This will reduce the effectiveness of
even the best strategic plan.
With the
business world changing so rapidly, what now determines an organization’s
ability to survive and thrive is management’s ability to Pro-Act and create
consensus with independent thinking employees, staff, vendors, and customers.
Organizations which are run by people who are oblivious to this fact, are
doomed.
Creating
Consensus
Love-based leaders strive to
create consensus in order to achieve results with others. They realize that
their egos must be put aside, and they then operate with the premise that there
is seldom a single solution to any problem. Unanimity is rarely achievable, and
is not the goal of consensus.
Consensus is the result of both individual choice
and teamwork.
CONSENSUS
= AUTONOMY + UNITY
Consensus is that state of agreement where all
members of
the group can say with integrity:
“This is
the best alternative the group will be able to agree on,
that I
can and will support,
even if I
personally think there is a better choice.”
100
In my
outdoor leadership seminars, I have noticed that groups often spent more time
debating the best solution to a problem-solving game, than it would take to
test every single one of the suggestions. Further, once a solution is found,
those who saw their ideas tossed aside usually do not celebrate the final
solution.
Fighting
for your solution can cause others to resist your ideas and suggestions, and to
resent you if their ideas are ignored. By endorsing other ideas before your
own, effective alternatives are often found. Besides, it is usually better to
have consensus on an “inferior” solution than resistance on a “perfect” one.
Typically,
when we spend time debating the best approach to solving a problem there are
winners and losers. The winners may or may not be arrogant about their
victories, but the losers are invariably resistant and are often resentful. The
love-based leader in business uses techniques for creating consensus as a
roadmap for eliminating this resistance.
When
there is consensus the people of the organization are in agreement, “We have
the best product, or president, or pricing,” or “We have to save our jobs,” or “We
have to beat off-shore competition.” When the people of an organization are
in consensus, their various tasks and activities automatically operate in
alignment. This synergy is actually the by-product of consensus, and not a goal
within itself.
For
example, I have observed that almost every time management fails to change an
undesired behavior of its employees, it turns out that there is a company
policy or a management behavior which actually causes, and usually even
rewards, this behavior. Consensus is the best way to discover the disruptive
policy. This will lead to an effortless change in the undesired behaviors. It
always works.
When
effectively creating consensus, there is even a tendency for numerous small
groups within an organization to come to identical solutions to problems … with
one exception. If the president, owner, or manager is in a group, that group
will typically reach a different conclusion.
The most
likely reason is that many people loathe being rejected by a poor manager so they
give input too carefully. Thus, ideas are lost. Conversely, in an effort to
help excellent managers, people tend to filter their input in order to either
make their boss’s decisions easier, or to impress them. Again, ideas are lost.
In both cases it is the position-power of the boss, real or assumed, which
prevents the creation of true consensus.
Consequently,
consensus requires the traditional boss/leader to be very clear that his/her
voice is just one voice. It is generally best for them to hold off giving
his/her ideas and opinions until group consensus is imminent.
Additionally,
to assure an open dialog, the traditional boss/leader needs to refrain from
endorsing or criticizing any of the ideas being presented during the
problem-solving by consensus session. Perhaps even more importantly, it
requires that all members of the group knows ahead of time, that the
boss/leader will make every effort to implement the final consensus. Otherwise,
there is no point to the exercise.
101
The
Distributor
I consulted with the Canadian
distributor of five different product lines, one of which was a luxurious line
of stuffed animals. Most of its sales came from this one product line.
Unfortunately, the suppliers of their other four product lines were threatening
to change distributors due to their low sales volume from this distributor.
This would represent a potential loss of 25% of their total sales revenue, and
would mean the company would not be able to cover its fixed costs.
The president
knew he had to do something, so he started using his position-power to demand
increased sales from the other four product lines. He tried threats, contests,
pleading, and bonuses. Nothing worked.
Starting
with the assumption that there are reasons for all behaviors, I set out to
discover what was motivating the sales force to focus only on one product, even
when they knew they needed to sell the other four as well. The first thing that
I discovered was a “Comfort Zone”. By selling the stuffed animals, which
required little effort, almost everyone on the sales force was making a good
living.
The
second thing I discovered was the contests, the boss’s pleas, the bonuses, and
the threats had little or no effect because of fear. Almost to a person, the
sales force was worried about losing existing customers. They thought it might
upset their customers to push products they had already refused. Additionally,
they generally felt that prospective customers would only be interested in the
stuffed animals, so they did not want to blow new sales by pushing the less
desirable products.
This was
interesting, but it did not give me what I was looking for. I sat down with the
president to discuss my findings. He spoke to me of his desire for employees to
be successful, and he reiterated his concern that they were not responding to
his requests.
102
I
discovered the company policy that had unintentionally set this up. The
president told me he especially wanted new hires to be successful so efforts at
training them would not be wasted. He encouraged his managers to help new hires
create a customer base with the easier to sell stuffed animals.
I was
impressed. This man was actively pursuing the win-win concept. The new hires
would win by receiving commissions that exceeded their minimal training draw.
The managers would win with higher bonuses tied to their total sales volume.
The president would win by increasing sales and reducing the amount of time he
had to pay a training draw.
My second
step was to conduct a problem-solving session with the managers, sales-people,
and the president. First we broke into small teams to solve a hypothetical
problem. Everyone learned the basics of how to create answers by consensus.
Once they
had the idea, I presented the boss’s dilemma, “How can we get the sales
force to sell more of the four other products?” Each team was to come up with a possible solution. The only
ground rule was each team member had to be able to support the team’s idea,
even if they personally thought there was a better answer.
One by
one, I read each team’s very similar suggestions. The solution was obvious.
My
recommendation to the president went as follows: “New hires have traditionally
been trained to sell the stuffed animals first. The consensus of your employees
is that from now on, all new hires should ONLY be allowed to sell the other
four product lines. Only when they reach a certain sales volume will they be
allowed to sell the line of stuffed animals.” He agreed to implement the
policy. As far as I could tell, he
had nothing to lose.
A year
later I was invited back to do a follow-up seminar. This is always a good sign.
I asked about the results of the policy change on sales. The president smiled
and told me, “Sales of the four smaller
product lines are up 50%, and the stuffed
animals sales are up 20% as well. We are looking to add a few more product
lines.”
I asked
what he believed had happened. He explained that because his managers had to
focus on the other four product lines while training new hires, everything
changed. Not surprisingly, when the new hires became proficient at selling the
other four products, they had little trouble selling the popular stuffed
animals. Not bad, but the sales turn-around was really caused by something
else.
The
minute the managers changed their focus to training new hires to sell
everything but the stuffed animals, virtually all sales-people began selling
more of those other product lines as well. The people who resisted changing
when the boss had demanded it, voluntarily changed right along with the
implementation of the new training policy.
In this
case, the president became a more effective leader when he began to realize his
people did things for their reasons and not his. Instead of trying to use
position-power to change his sales force, he changed himself by allowing for a
policy to be set by consensus.
103
Guidelines
for Creating Consensus
Making a decision which directly
affects only yourself is difficult enough. Working together in a family, where
individuals have different wants and needs, can be even more frustrating.
However,
the creation of consensus within an organization can be overwhelming. This is
because most businesses are still run by dictatorial, position-power fear-based
management. Fortunately, when done properly, the creation of consensus is still
possible in those companies.
Solving
problems with consensus involves change. In order to overcome resistance to
change, all participants must commit to keep the following agreements.
#1: Advance Agreement to a Final
Decision
For large organizations, form
discussion groups of from 5 to 8 people. For small companies and families, one
group is ample. The members of each group need to agree in advance to support
the final decision of the group, even if they disagree with that decision.
#2: Agreement of Equality of
Opinion
All people must be prepared to
share their position as logically as possible, but each person agrees to avoid
arguing for their own solution. Conflicts need to be avoided, but be wary of
quick agreements, which may mean that some ideas have been left unspoken.
Always make sure everyone has shared at least one idea.
#3: Agreement to Seek Acceptable
Alternatives
All members agree to seek out
next-best acceptable alternatives when an impasse occurs, and that there will
be no voting. Each person agrees to yield to positions that have some logic,
and at least a possibility of success, even if individually they feel there is
a better solution.
The Two Objectives of Consensus:
1) Group
ALIGNMENT for the process of solving a problem.
2) Group
CELEBRATION for each failure, not just for each success.
104
“Well Days” at the Warehouse
Here is an example that
illustrates how the consensus process was used to easily and quickly solve a
serious internal problem.
Another
company’s needs for an accurate and timely inventory traditionally caused great
stress between Christmas and New Year’s. This difficult task was compounded as
many employees tended to call in sick during this period. Threats, directives,
pep talks, and staff meetings all failed to correct this situation, which was
destroying morale and productivity.
Near the
end of a one-day seminar on consensus, I put this problem to the staff. First,
they broke into small groups to solve a hypothetical problem. Then, each team
was instructed to come to a consensus on what was causing this year-end rash of
sick-days, and what their solution would be. As always, I insisted the
president of the company be in one of the groups.
Virtually
every consultation I have been involved with has had a similar conclusion,
which held true to form for this company as well. All groups, except the president’s,
came up with the same reason for the problem, and the same solution. Even a
good leader has trouble overcoming their position-power.
The Cause of the Problem:
Company policy stated “sick days
do not accumulate”. Since sick days are lost if not used in any one calendar
year, people who had not used theirs felt they would be cheated of paid time
off, simply because they had stayed healthy. They viewed sick days as a perk,
and therefore called in sick at the end of the year. Indeed, many people had
even gotten to the point of planning for this eventuality so they would have
extra time to prepare for the holiday season.
The Solution by Consensus:
The company should change their
policy to allow employees to use either paid “sick days” or “well days”,
neither of which would accumulate.
The Result:
People could call in “well” on a
nice summer day, and not have to worry about getting caught. They could even
show off their tans. Stress levels plummeted. Most people used up their “sick”
or “well” days by the holidays. The few who chose to take well days at that
time of the year were minimal. In fact, these people were not resented because
everyone else knew they themselves had taken advantage of this policy during
the year.
105
Whether they realize it or not,
business and governmental leaders typically make their decisions without all of
the facts.
Consensus
is the only effective alternative.
The
larger the number of people involved in a decision,
the more
perfect the answer becomes,
with a
resulting increased alignment of actions.
106
EXERCISE
#5 - Creating Consensus
Take a current situation at home or at work.
Organize a group session to create a consensus solution. Test the idea and then
journal what happened.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
107
Most
people strive to make a difference IN their life.
Love-Based Leaders strive to make a difference WITH their life.
108
CHAPTER 5
Our One
Quest is Peace
I n the previous chapters, we have
covered how to identify and overcome fear-based reactions, build trust, create
consensus, and more. Everything presented has one thing in common with
everything else: Eventually, the successful understanding and implementation of
these concepts will always result in feelings of peace.
Internal,
Interpersonal, and International
Our One
Quest is Peace.
The quest
for peace is universal. Usually we seek an “internal” peace associated with
physical wellness and self-worth. Often the quest is for “interpersonal” peace,
created from having fulfilling personal and business relationships. There is
also a great longing for “international” peace, which comes from living in a
predictable world where mutual respect exists between nations.
Throughout
history peace, however temporary, has generally been achieved at the expense of
someone else. We have fought for food, for land, for honor, for money, and for
power. In a pre-1976, fear-based, win-lose, you-or-me world, peace was never
available to everyone. Fear-based living at least provided a chance for
temporary peace for some.
However,
in a post-1976, love-based, win-win, you-and-me world, peace is now available
to everyone. As such, fear-based living only limits the chance for peace. It is
only by overcoming fear-based reactions, and living as a love-based leader,
that you significantly increase everyone’s chances for peace … personally,
professionally, and globally.
109
The
Dachau Survivor
In 1982, I attended a lecture in
Evanston, Illinois. The events of that evening had a profound impact on my view
of the power of forgiveness.
The
speaker was relatively famous for his forgiveness messages, so most of the
people in attendance were already supportive of this topic. It promised to be
an inspirational evening for people who were, at least conceptually, quite open
to his ideas. This was not a hostile crowd.
An impromptu survey of several
people revealed I was one of the few in the audience who had not read any of
the speaker’s books. To remedy this situation, I went to the lobby and bought
one. I thought I might be able to get it autographed.
The
speaker came out to a rousing ovation, and spoke on the power of love and
forgiveness for more than an hour.
He had us
in tears one moment, then laughing a few minutes later. He spoke beautifully
and effortlessly. Everyone was having a marvelous time.
Firmly he
stated messages such as, “You have to
forgive your enemies. You have to
forgive family members who’ve hurt you. Forgiveness is the key to peace and
happiness.” People were practically cheering. So far, so good.
“You have to forgive strangers who’ve stepped on
your toes, or even accosted you,” he
continued to even more applause. “And you
must forgive yourself for the people you’ve hurt.” We loved that one.
The
speaker was on a roll. We responded with continued applause and cheering until
he said something rarely heard in a public address.
He said,
“In fact, the Jews will never be free until they
forgive Hitler.”
Our
celebration hit a wall, and there was an abrupt silence. You could hear a
collective gasp of disbelief at what had just been spoken, followed by an
explosion of vehemence, the likes of which I have never witnessed.
Almost as
he said, “In fact, the Jews will never be
free until they forgive Hitler,” a
tiny woman in the third or fourth row stood up and started screaming at him. Her tirade was a mixture of
profanity, insults, and tears. It was quite difficult to decipher, but what I
could understand sent a chill down my spine.
It became
apparent that she was a survivor of the Dachau concentration camp. It was clear
her hatred for Nazis would not tolerate any attempt to diminish her resentment
and loathing.
She lived
in nearby Skokie. Many survivors of concentration camps settled in this
community after World War II. There were probably several other Holocaust
survivors in the audience, and many of their children. This was not the place
to say, “In fact, the Jews will never be
free until they forgive Hitler.”
For
several minutes, she spat her hatred at the speaker, and then literally collapsed
from exhaustion into the arms of the people sitting next to her. For a moment
it appeared she had actually died. Fortunately she had not, but she was totally
spent.
110
I had
been watching the speaker during her attack. Never had I seen a man so naked.
He just stood there and took it. You could see the depth of compassion on his
face. I watched him struggle to find something, anything, to say to her.
I wager
that he wanted to come down off the stage, embrace her, and tell her he was
sorry for what he said. Nevertheless, he knew the truth. Her hatred of Nazis
was killing her.
He knew
this woman really needed to forgive the Nazis, for her own sake. However, any
response on his part, “Hating the Nazis
is killing you,” or “Forgiveness is
divine,” would sound like empty platitudes, and he knew it. He really had nowhere to go.
Then, I heard someone crying.
This was the only sound in the theatre of stunned observers, and it began to
attract attention.
A young
man was standing and weeping. I wondered about what he might do. Finally, he
spoke through his tears … with a thick German accent. If I live to be a
thousand, I hope I never forget what he said that evening.
He began
softly and with compassion. “Ma’am.
Nobody has a right to hate more than
you do. I can’t imagine the horrors you’ve lived through. I can’t imagine how
anyone could treat another human in the ways you and others were treated. What
makes it worse for me, however, is you are literally speaking of my parents and
grandparents. It shames me as a German. Nobody has a right to hate more than
you do.”
“But,” and he
pointed at the speaker and continued quite firmly, “you must listen to this man. I have been having the Holocaust shoved
down my throat since I was a child. I have been made to feel guilty and
responsible. It has made me angry because I was not alive when those atrocities
occurred.”
“And I am not alone,” he continued.
“Thousands, perhaps millions of other young Germans are fed up with being
judged for acts that were committed by others. If it keeps up, they will react.
You did not deserve to be treated the way you were treated, and we have not
deserved to be made to feel guilty for it. Keep on hating. Hitler would
approve.”
With
that, he made his way through the crowd toward the woman. When he reached her,
they embraced. The speaker visibly sighed with relief.
I watched
as people reached in to hug the people, who were hugging the people, who were
hugging the two of them. I would have given anything to be a part of that hug,
but I was too far away.
However,
the speaker was being ignored. So I went up on stage, and had him autograph my
copy of his book.
Finally,
he got everyone to take their seats and spoke some beautiful words. He did a
great job of bringing closure to what we had all witnessed. However, I knew it
was the words of this young man I would always remember:
“Keep on
hating. Hitler would approve.”
111
Forgiveness
Most people do not easily forgive
when they have been hurt. Resentment makes it difficult. Hatred makes it almost
impossible.
The
Reason Most People Do Not Forgive:
“If I forgive you for what you did, it implies what
you did was OK. Since what you did was not OK, I will not forgive you.”
To resist
forgiving is to rationalize the withholding of your love, abilities, and gifts.
When you fail to forgive, you may or may not hurt the other person, but you
definitely damage yourself.
Behold
the magnificent apple tree, which never says, “I only give my apples to the
deserving.” Regardless of the reason, an apple tree that stops bearing
fruit (their gifts) is in the process
of dying. Similarly, a human who stops giving love (or any of their gifts) is
also dying. We die emotionally at first, but eventually the rest of the body
follows.
Negative
reactions triggered by your resentment are fear-based. It does not matter if
your reasons are important or petty, real or perceived; to do so means you have
made a decision to allow others to run your life because of fear. The fact that
you can rationalize the behavior only proves you would not otherwise have acted
in such a manner. In other words, when you react to your fears, the negative
circumstance is in control ... not you.
Forgiveness
does not mean you condone the hurtful actions of another person. It does mean
that you have decided that those actions are not going to control you. Choosing
to forgive when the conditions are hurtful, especially when you are tempted to
react with hate, is true self-control.
When you forgive,
you are “giving forth” love. Obviously, the person you are resenting benefits
when you forgive, simply because you are not striving to hurt them back. More
significantly, however, you benefit when you forgive. Clearly the person who
hurt you did not create the forgiveness … you created it. As such, to forgive
another is to stay in charge of your self.
Love-based
leaders overcome their own negativity in spite of their problems and
circumstances. I call them “Visionaries”.
People
who live fear-based react negatively because of their problems and
circumstances. They are what I have come to call, “Victimaries”.
Instead
of reacting to your hurt, the answer is to strive to find love-based solutions
to your negative circumstances. Choosing to forgive when the conditions are
hurtful, especially when you are tempted to react with hate and anger, is a
sign of a love-based leader.
112
Hate
begets hate. Hating the haters is not the answer, for you have already chosen
to emulate them in your own way. Or, as I heard a comic-pianist jokingly
proclaim in the late 1960’s:
“I know there are people in this world who do not
love their fellow human beings, and I hate people like that.”
Tom
Lehrer
Their
Daughter Was Murdered
She was the kind of daughter
parents dream of. She was talented, lovely, athletic, intelligent, joyful, and
full of dreams for her life. Then one day, tragically, she was brutally
murdered.
Her
parents died more than a little bit that day. In an attempt to cope, they
turned her bedroom into a shrine filled with photographs, trophies, newspaper
articles, art projects, and other memorabilia. Unfortunately, this monument
served only to intensify their grief.
Months
passed, and the more they focused on their loss, the worse their grief became.
But a few months later, the girl’s mother had a startling insight.
She asked
her husband, “If we’d raised a son who
could have done such a thing to
another person, just imagine the pain we’d be going through.” Unbelievably,
she and her husband went to the parents of their daughter’s killer to help them
deal with their own grief and shame.
The
deceased girl’s mother created a healing connection with people whom most of us
would have resented, avoided, or even attacked. She even influenced her husband
to participate.
Realizing
they could not change their circumstance, and unwilling to forgive the man who
killed their daughter, these people instead found peace by choosing to create a
circumstance in which they could be loving and giving. What a powerful and
beautiful legacy for their daughter.
You may
not agree with their decision. But you have to agree that it took courage.
We may
have no control over our circumstances. But we do have control over ourselves
and how we handle those circumstances. By their nature, love-based leaders do
not follow the crowd. They find a course of action that works, regardless of
what most people would do. Some people would call that the mark of greatness.
113
COURAGE
There is no trick to
demonstrating love-based leadership when life is working. The challenge is to
possess these leadership qualities when something, or everything, goes wrong.
Whether you are threatened with losing something you want, or with getting something
you do not want, courage is the one characteristic you will need to be able to
control yourself, as opposed to losing control or trying to control those
around you.
“What’ve
they got that I ain’t got?” asked the Cowardly Lion.
“Courage!”
replied Dorothy, the Scarecrow and the Tin Man.
Yes, it
can be challenging to identify and overcome our own fear-based reactions to any
negative circumstance. However, to inspire others to do likewise is the true
test of leadership. Your ability to discover and implement solutions requiring
consensus will be in direct proportion to your willingness to be courageous.
Courage, however, is not the lack of fear. Courage is an act in the face of
fear.
When
people observe others achieving personal and professional success, seemingly
without fear, they often reach an erroneous conclusion. They think fear itself
is the problem. Therefore, they decide, it will be by eliminating their fears
that they will be similarly successful.
Effective
leaders are sensitive to their fears. They are neither overwhelmed by their
fears, nor are they in denial of them. Because of this, sometimes they are able
to make conscious decisions to risk, in spite of their fears. At other times
they choose to be cautious, because of their fears.
While we
seek out feelings of joy and happiness in our quest for success, it is fear
that may actually be the most valuable feeling of all. Fear of being hurt can
keep us alive when there is danger. Fear of loss can warn us when we should not
trust someone. Fear of dying can give our lives a sense of urgency.
Rock
climbing, for example, begins with the assumption that something could go
wrong. The high levels of fear of the real risk of falling become only
perceptions of risk with the proper use of safety equipment. It is not
courageous to face danger without proper planning and clear agreements. It is
foolhardy.
My
daughter Kelcey once overcame her fears to climb a 50-foot rock face. Her
courage to overcome her fear of falling was inspirational. This experience was
made possible because of quality safety equipment and expert supervision.
Several times she fell, screamed, laughed about it, and continued climbing.
However,
after completing her climb and unhooking her equipment, Kelcey jumped for joy
off a small boulder and sprained her ankle. Because of her lack of fear, she
perceived no need to plan for something going wrong. As a result, jumping off a
little rock nearly caused a broken leg.
With
jobs and relationships, just
as with rock
climbing, begin with
the
114
assumption things might go wrong.
The acts of pre-planning and making clear agreements are the career and
relationship equivalents of having a certified climbing harness and properly
manned belay ropes.
Rejection
in business is always a possibility when you strive for consensus, ask for a
sale, interview for a job, or make a presentation. Nevertheless, there is no
more danger from rejection, than there is from falling while attached to a
safety rope. You may not enjoy the feelings of rejection, but you are no worse
off than before. Shake it off, learn from the experience, and do it differently
the next time.
If you
were to conduct a study of all effective leaders, you would find many
differences. However, at their core you would discover one common
characteristic … courage. This element consistently separates the successful
from the unsuccessful, and the great from the average.
Without fear, no act is courageous. Fear is
required.
Courage
is a victory over fear. Courage empowers you to overcome fear-based behaviors
such as insecurity, anger, anxiety, procrastination, worry, indifference,
obsession, and denial; which otherwise could sabotage your personal and
professional results.
Whenever
you have a fear-based reaction to negativity, you give your personal power
away. Until you stop giving your power away, you will always find a way to
fail. The cure for this “disease” of negativity is courage. When you develop
the courage to do those things you fear, you become the master of your own
life.
The
single greatest reason people fail to succeed is the destruction of their
personal power. Regardless of whether your self-worth was destroyed as a child,
or your self-esteem has been trashed as an adult, your personal power can be
restored with courage. The only moment that matters is now.
Having
Fear is Not the Problem.
Eliminating
Fear is Not the Solution.
115
Daniel
In 2004, I was invited to Panama
to give a keynote address at a three-day business conference. While I had been
conducting seminars for years, this was to be my first 1-hour talk. I was
excited, but quite nervous.
Appropriately,
my talk was entitled, “Get Over Yourself”. I spoke about believing in your
dreams, and then exceeding them. At the conclusion of my presentation I asked
the question, “If only one person gets it, really gets it, then my talk today
has been worth it. Are you the one? Are you the one who is going to achieve
more than you have ever dreamed?”
During
the evening, several participants approached me to thank me for the
presentation and to confidently pronounce, “I
am the one.” Daniel was one of them, but with him there was something
different in his tone. His was neither a wish nor a commitment. It was a simple
statement of fact, and it touched me deeply.
Something
else was different. Daniel was the only one in a wheelchair. His very pregnant
wife was pushing him. I thought, “Not on
my watch.” I immediately took over that duty from her.
That was
the beginning of my friendship with Daniel. Over the next three days, I came to
find out that he had been injured in a training exercise while in the military.
After several years of treatment the prognosis was that Daniel would never walk
again, and his therapy was discontinued.
The
conference ended, but Daniel and I stayed connected. Six months later, Daniel
was able to do something that his military therapists had said would never
happen. He was able to get around on crutches. He credited this miracle to what
he had learned from me. I was a bit more than moved, but quite certain this was
mostly due to his extraordinary attitude.
Then,
about a year later, Daniel showed up to see me speak in the Bahamas without
crutches! Not only that, but when I was too tired to take my wife dancing, he
filled in for me.
Since
then, Daniel has had many victories including going back to school and taking
up Karate. Rather than try to tell you about them, I will let Daniel tell you
in his own words.
116
Dear Ross,
The lessons you teach have transformed my life. As
you know, I was consigned to a wheelchair or crutches for life. I had let my
military injury win, crush me, and make me believe that walking again was impossible.
I believed I was trapped via my circumstances to live in misery and pain.
I cannot stop thinking about how you about broke
your back pushing my wheelchair up that ungodly hill in Panama. I can still see
the beads of sweat raining off your brow and the redness of your face. At
first, I felt so helpless and guilty that it was so difficult for you, but you
showed me that you don’t just preach love-based leadership, you live it.
When you said, “Circumstances
can NEVER be who you are,” something pierced my soul like electricity and
penetrated through my barriers of self-pity, hate, frustration, and pain. It
was then I realized my happiness was entirely my responsibility, and NO
disability has the power to take it away.
Until I forgave the military, I was consigned to a wheelchair for life.
Today, I walk. I am (because I want to take my physical strength to the next
level) now enrolled in a Kenpo Karate class. Although there are times where my
hip does not want to cooperate I am finding greater strength and balance.
I am excited that at the end of the semester I will
be testing for my yellow belt in Karate. I love it so much that I will continue
on till I get my black belt (which will be a 2-3 year commitment).
I am taking two English writing
classes, and last semester I was awarded 2nd Best Poet of the University. I
have been receiving praise from peers, faculty and readers.
I am also taking three music classes where I am
learning voice, composition and theory. I have multiple songs that I have written
and will be going to a recording studio this year to get them on an album.
Today, I am Happy. Today, I am in
Karate. Today, I am a Fighter. Today, I fight for my life because I deserve to
live.
I thank God that you were the messenger I needed. I am forever grateful.
You taught me, to believe in me. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
It all started with forgiveness. I am forever a believer in the
impossible.
Daniel Lawrence Sabin
117
The
Mirror Concept
I have often used Mother Teresa
as an example of a love-based leader. People admire many different facets of
her persona. For some it is her faith. For others it is her love for, and
commitment to, “the poorest of the poor.”
By studying Mother Teresa, many have learned to emulate and demonstrate these
qualities.
The
MIRROR Concept:
That
which you admire in others,
is a
reflection of your own special gifts.
But if
your definition of a love-based leader is limited to saints such as Mother
Teresa, you will have put her on a pedestal. To say something such as, “She is incredible. But I could never do
what she does,” is to diminish your own
self-worth, which is a necessary quality of a love-based leader. You also
belittle the actual effort of the honored person, who always had to overcome
his or her own challenges and self-doubts.
It is
ironic that the very act of praising a great person should have a limiting
effect on the person giving the acknowledgement. When someone is in awe of, or
even worships, a love-based leader they may engage in philosophical discussions
about the person’s qualities or accomplishments. However, because most believe
they cannot reach the same level of accomplishment, they do not even take the
first step towards becoming a love-based leader themselves.
“When you put someone on a pedestal,
you are really putting yourself into a hole.”
Jan Sanders (my mother)
That does
not mean you should not emulate the people you admire. On the contrary, if you
truly want to discover your gifts and talents, seek to develop from within
yourself that which you admire in another.
The
Mirror Concept operates under the premise that it is not possible to recognize
a great quality in someone else, unless you yourself possess elements of that
same quality. Basically, if you see it, you got it.
118
Additionally,
since no two people see exactly the same qualities in any other person, the
unique qualities you admire in another are mirrors of your own unique
qualities. It goes under the, “It takes
one to know one” principle.
Martin
Luther King Jr. is an excellent person to use with the mirror concept. Some
people admired his determination. For others it was his compassion. Many saw
Dr. King’s speaking ability as his greatest attribute, and others thought it
was his commitment to non-violent protest. Just select one of his
characteristics that you admire, and then strive to develop it in yourself.
Unfortunately,
old habits die hard. To develop as a love-based leader, it is important to not set
the bar too high. Start small and celebrate little victories. Then tackle
bigger challenges.
Benjamin
Franklin changed a habit every 21 days. Maxwell Maltz, in his book
Psycho-cybernetics, determined that it takes 21 days to change a habit or
belief. Attending a weekend seminar, or reading a book can only cause temporary
effects, unless you practice and demonstrate the tools and concepts you learn
for at least 21 days.
LIVING
Fear-Based or LEADING Love-Based
I did not begin this work by
teaching love-based leadership. My focus was on teaching people to create
solutions to their personal and professional problems, by identifying and
overcoming their own negative fear-based reactions. It worked very nicely.
Over the
years, however, I realized something else was happening. Every time someone
overcame their own fear-based reactions, their efforts always inspired others.
Always.
The Best
Definition of a Love-Based Leader:
Someone Who Inspires Others
That is
not to say that they always reached the intended person or persons in the way
they necessarily envisioned ... they did not. Nevertheless it became apparent
that even failed efforts to overcome fear-based reactions had a positive effect
on someone.
Yes,
there was often a positive effect on the intended person. But sometimes the
impact was on someone who was so impressed with the effort that they began
challenging their own thinking. For example, after an unsuccessful attempt to
reach a boss, someone else would say something such as, “I can’t believe you stood up
to him without anger. I would have ripped his head off. How did you do that?”
It was
then that I realized that I had not been teaching people to choose between
living fear-based or living love-based. I had been teaching them to choose between
living fear-based or LEADING love-based. They did not need to strive to be
leaders, it just happened.
119
Further
observations revealed this leadership to be the automatic result overcoming any
fear-based reaction, large or small. People did not need to take huge steps to
become a love-based leader. Even small steps had impact.
Love-based
leadership does not need to be a grand, complicated change in lifestyle or
intention. It can be as small as wiping off the top of a messy ketchup bottle,
instead of complaining to the waitress. By looking for small fear-based
reactions to overcome, you will slowly but surely build your abilities as a
love-based leader.
Instead
of sharing your irritation about how long you waited to pay a toll, when you
get to the booth tell the operator that you want to pay the toll for the car
behind you. Sometimes, rather than grumbling about your rotten work
environment, you might try giving someone a flower.
Two
Flowers
When I challenge my students overcome
their fear based reactions, and to create love-based solutions at work, there
is usually some resistance. Many times people simply lack an idea they can get
enthusiastic about. True, some people fear rejection, but even that is often
just an excuse for not trying something new.
The
solution is to start small and develop competency before you tackle bigger
projects.
“It’s not about doing great things.
It’s about doing small things with greatness.”
Mother
Teresa
The best
ideas are usually simple. They stand out with their elegance. If you are stuck
for an idea, the solution is to form a small master-mind group to come to
consensus on one. I often split a seminar into a few master-mind groups to come
up with creative solutions to each other’s problems.
In one
such group, a participant shared that he disliked how personal relationships
tended to stay within each department in his company. He felt that each
department had become its own little island unto itself.
Even
though everyone in his company ate in the same lunchroom, most people tended to
sit with the people from their department. Purchasing, accounting, computer
processing, customer service, and every other department tended to eat in their
own little groups. Even the sales department, when they were not having lunch
with clients, tended to eat only with other people from the sales department.
120
His master-mind group came to
consensus with an idea to change this. At first he laughed, but after some
encouragement from his group, he decided to do it.
That
night he bought two flowers on his way home. In the morning, he got to work
early and placed one flower on the desk of someone in Quality Control, and one
flower on someone’s desk in Accounting. The next day he placed one flower on
the desk of the Vice-President’s secretary, and one in a work-station in
Computer Processing.
This
process continued for days. He would arrive early and place a flower on a
different desk in two different departments. By the end of the first week, both
people who received a flower were actively trying to find out who got the other
one.
By the
end of the second week, everyone was arriving in the lunchroom in anticipation
of discovering which two people got flowers that day. Lunchtime became a joyous
time of mingling and laughter.
Once, to
avert suspicion, he even put a flower on his own desk. This continued for about
a month, and he was never identified.
After he
quit bringing flowers, he noticed that people continued to look for the
recipients of that day’s flowers. People were starting to miss the event.
Not long
afterwards, he got to work to find that several people had purchased a flower
for everybody. They had bought dozens of flowers and placed one on every desk,
work-station, locker, and truck. People were more excited than when bonuses
were handed out.
Lunch was
never the same again. People are still trying to figure out who the “flower-person”
was. Every now and then, he comes early and drops off another two flowers.
Periodically, so do others. On more than one occasion, he has come to work to
find a flower on his own desk.
He will never talk. He is having too much fun. So
is everyone else.
“Man is the center of a circle, the circumference
of which
is determined by self-imposed limitations.”
Mahatma
Gandhi
Are
people fighting to get into your life, or are they fighting to get out of it?
Are you moving one step closer to global impact every day, or one step closer
to solitary confinement?
121
“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one
thinks of changing himself.”
Leo
Nikolayevich Tolstoy
122
The
Penalty of Leadership
There is a penalty for choosing to live fear-based.
Your dreams die a little bit with each fear-based reaction or pre-action. As a
result, most people kill their own dreams long before their life is over. When
they do get to the end of such a life, they have disappointments, regrets, resentment,
guilt, shame, and blame. These are the people who did not achieve their true
potential. Is this your destiny?
Merely
discussing and philosophizing what you have read in this book, or elsewhere,
will be a waste of time. You must take action if you want your life to change.
In the words of my father, “Given the
opportunity, most people are prone to
procrastinate.”
Possibly
the greatest of all personal tragedies is to end your life with the thought, “If only I had another chance.” Based on
the number of chances most people waste, another life would make little
difference.
It has
been said that your dreams give your life value.
But it is
how you live that gives your dreams value.
There is
also a penalty for choosing to overcome your fear-based reactions and become a
love-based leader. If you are unaware of this penalty you will be surprised and
threatened when it occurs, and it will occur. To be aware of this penalty is to
be prepared for it.
The
penalty for living a life of excellence as a love-based leader is that you will
be criticized when you fail. You will also be criticized when you succeed. Just
as many before you, you may be ridiculed for your great dreams or new ideas.
Some people will misinterpret your good intentions, and will reject you.
Therefore,
before you begin your quest to live your life as a love-based leader, you need
to ask yourself a question, “Can I handle
some rejection?”
If not,
or if acceptance by others is your only goal, then do not strive to be a
love-based leader. Your fear-based reactions will prevent it, because
approval-seeking is a full-time job.
In a
world full of people living fear-based lives, just how does one consciously
choose to live a life as a love-based leader? Now we come to the most important
part of this book ... how to do it.
Attempting
to be a love-based leader without possessing the tools to make it happen is
just an exercise in futility. Let’s face it, old habits die hard.
The next
four chapters are dedicated to teaching you how to shift from living fear-based
to leading love-based by using the “Four E’s of Excellence.” I challenge you to
create a great life, a life of excellence. How to get there will become clear,
if you spend just a few minutes a day within these four chapters.
123
Four E’s
of Excellence
ETHICS -
ENTHUSIASM - EVALUATION - EMPATHY
Present in all truly effective personal and professional relationships,
these elements could also be defined as vision, joy, determination, and
compassion. Regardless of the names we assign, self-control is needed to
demonstrate them in the face of negative circumstances.
When you become aware of your negative Fear-Based
Reactions, it becomes easier to see how you are attempting to control
others with actual or implied Position-Power. With that awareness,
you will be empowered to utilize the tools in this section to change your life
and your results.
Instead of focusing on what others are doing wrong, learn to use “Four
E’s of Excellence” to take responsibility for yourself. Your impact
will be greatly enhanced as you experience the power of living your life as a Love-Based
Leader. It is worth the effort.
Excellence is the Art of
Self-Control
E T H I C S
X
C
E N T H U S
I A S M
L
L
E V A L U A
T I O N
N
C
E M P A T H
Y
124
125
ETHICS
Results - NOT Excuses
“The result of most attempts at communication,
is misunderstanding.”
James H. Quinn
126
CHAPTER 6
ETHICS
The
Alternative to FACADE
The FACADE fear-based reaction occurs when you take responsibility for
the feelings of others. You try to protect them by saying what you feel they
want to hear or what you think they can handle, instead of the truth.
The
FACADE fear-based reaction also happens when you feel threatened or intimidated
and try to protect yourself. Either way, whether it is to protect yourself or
to protect others, you are trying to solve problems by clouding the facts,
twisting the truth, or even lying. This rarely, if ever, ends well.
Regardless
of your motivation, your Ethics are sacrificed when your comments are untrue: “You look fine in that dress;” or “I’m sorry, it will never happen again;” or “I can change”. If you do not say what you mean often enough, eventually you will lose the
trust of others.
When you
demonstrate the FACADE fear-based reaction, you can easily end up hurt or angry
when this causes you to be misunderstood or unappreciated. When you are
worried, if your primary concern is to evade problems and conflict, your
integrity will suffer ... often with disastrous results.
Ironically
your FACADE fear-based reaction to prevent problems usually provides others
with the justification of Fight, Flight, Freeze, or Facade reactions in return.
FACADE fear-based reactions may delay, but do not prevent, the Reactive Cycle.
“Clarity at all costs … or it costs you all.”
Christine G. Quinn (my wife)
127
A typical
FACADE fear-based reaction is to fake agreement to “keep the peace,” which may
have the opposite effect. Unless your intention is to have others react to you
with negativity, you need to make a conscious choice to eliminate any
perception that you could be lying.
Perhaps
your intention is to be kind and supportive, but because you are “walking on
eggshells”, it can appear to others as if you are being insincere. If this
behavior threatens them, and it often does, they will react to you. You, in
turn, react to their reaction and the Reactive Cycle begins and escalates.
When you
make a “boldfaced lie” intended to hurt someone, resentment invariably results.
However, even a “white lie” designed to benefit another often creates problems.
Whether
you remember it or not, you would not be using the FACADE fear-based reaction
unless you had experienced being hurt when you tried to be honest. You might
have been punished for being truthful. Maybe you shared a great idea, but were
ridiculed by friends. Perhaps you were blunt and lost a friendship because you
hurt someone’s feelings.
Eventually,
you developed the FACADE fear-based reaction as one of your defense systems.
Perhaps feigning agreement kept people off your back. Pretending to love may
have made you feel that you were being kind to someone you knew you were going
to hurt with an eventual break-up. Coming up with convincing excuses may have
protected you when something went wrong.
Whether
you lie to protect someone else or yourself,
you may
temporarily achieve desired results,
but the lie will eventually come home to haunt you.
FACADE
fear-based reactions, as with all fear-based reactions, must have had some
value (real or perceived) in order for you to have repeated them enough times
to become habits. The good news is that once you realize they were chosen for
value in the first place, you can choose to change the way you react for a
higher value today.
Basically,
to overcome FACADE fear-based reactions, you need to focus on what you want to
CREATE instead of on what you are trying to PREVENT. This is especially
important when doing so would seem likely to cause difficulties. Telling people
what you think they want to hear, or what you think they can handle, often
gives a short-term illusion of effectiveness. Eventually, however, this tends
to create new problems.
If your
relationship is important, strive to share your truth with kindness. Be direct
in saying what you need or want, without filtering anything. It may help to
remember that the FACADE fear-based reaction, even when motivated by good
intentions, is still a lie.
128
“Sarge”
My father’s mother, Lydia, had
lived with us since I was a child. Her husband passed away from cancer shortly
after my birth. Her strength and experience was a blessing to my parents.
My
grandmother was a large woman, but her power was in her indomitable spirit.
Everyone called her “Gram,” not just family. However, my brother and I
nicknamed her “Sarge” because she was so strong-willed. I have never met anyone
with a greater love of people, or with less fear of rejection.
Sarge
raised three successful sons … Paul, James and Charles. In her lifetime she
taught school, ran a ranch, managed a fabric store, was in charge of
enrollments for our LifeStream seminars, and traveled extensively. At her
passing, Gram’s wake attracted hundreds of people. As a measure of her impact,
almost half of those in attendance had never even met her.
When Gram
was about 80, my mother began to notice she was emanating a body odor, even
though her personal hygiene habits apparently had not changed. It kept getting
worse and worse. Mom said nothing about it, as she did not want to hurt Gram’s
feelings.
Facade
Fear-Based Reactions always involve a lie.
Even the
act of sparing someone’s feelings
can have terrible results.
My mother
casually started to question her. “Have
you changed your soap?”, “Have you
started wearing a new perfume?”, “Are you using a new deodorant?” Each
time, Gram would respond that nothing had changed.
Finally,
it got so bad my mother overcame her fears of hurting Gram’s feelings and told
her how offensive her odor was becoming. Gram was shocked, but not embarrassed.
Nothing embarrassed her. Together they eliminated all possible causes of the
odor, and decided to have it checked out by her doctor.
Testing
confirmed cervical cancer. Surgery and treatment successfully took care of the
problem. However, her doctor told them it could have been fatal had they waited
much longer. It was very close. To this day, I remember my mother’s lament; “Gram almost died because I was worried
about hurting her feelings.”
129
ETHICS
Ethics could be defined as the
alignment of vision and behavior. The love-based leader behaves in a manner
consistent with their ideals. He or she can develop trust, because promises are
kept and results are achieved.
Consciously choose to make what you say will happen--happen.
The
ethical salesperson says, “I will exceed
my goals,” and will do whatever it takes to do so morally and legally. He
or she will overcome all obstacles. If it means calling on twice as many
prospects to achieve a goal, then that is what will happen. If a family
emergency comes up it will be handled. Afterwards, it is back to work with an
even higher resolve. Intentions equal results.
However,
many unsuccessful salespeople lack ethics. These people will set goals they do
not believe in to pacify or to impress a boss or a spouse. By setting
pie-in-the-sky goals, there will be two results:
They will fail because an
obstacle, any obstacle, will beat them. This failure will NOT be their fault.
They will have a good excuse, usually ending with a phrase such as, “Besides, it wasn’t really my goal anyway,
it was my manager’s.” “Victim”
stories are just
excuses. Murphy’s Law, “If
something can go wrong,
it will go wrong,” only provides uncommitted people with victim stories. True
success results from
honoring your commitments
above reasons,
justifications,
explanations, and excuses.
At the
core of ethics is honesty. Speak your truth, but do not kid yourself. People
are your barometer. If people are reacting negatively to you, your idea of
ethics is probably much like the proverbial “Bull in a China Shop”. It is
possible to be totally honest while demonstrating that you are doing so because
you care. Your perceived Ethics will increase when they co-exist with love,
calmness, gentleness, compassion, and respect.
It is
important that you learn to speak the other person’s language. If you are harsh
with someone who needs understanding, you might as well be speaking Chinese to
a German. They will not hear you.
Ethics
begins with doing or sharing something worthwhile, and then by acknowledging
the effort. It develops by noticing how others respond. If results are not
forthcoming, change your approach. By learning to overcome your own fear-based
reactions and then changing how you are expressing yourself (not just by
getting louder), others will eventually get the point.
Remember,
the FACADE reaction is fear-based. “White Lies” are justified in order to spare
the feelings of others. Blatant lies can find their base in fears of poverty,
rejection, abandonment, looking stupid, and so on. There is no limit to the
rationale available for the FACADE fear-based reactions.
The love-based leader is not dependent on the
approval of others. He or she
130
knows when something worthwhile
has been accomplished, even if everyone else decries or ignores the
achievement. Decisions are made because they are in alignment with personal
vision, not because they are popular. Whatever the “job” is, the focus is upon “getting
the job done”.
The
following quote is often misunderstood, and is generally taken out of context:
“Winning isn’t everything. Winning is the only
thing.”
Coach Vince Lombardi
However, Coach Lombardi’s
interpretation of “winning” changes the meaning of this famous statement.
According to Bart Starr, his two-time Super Bowl champion quarterback, people
rarely asked for Lombardi’s definition of winning:
Lombardi’s Definition of “Winning”
“Never go out to beat the other guy.
Only go out to be the best you can be. Then, you
are winning.”
Bart
Starr (quoting Vince Lombardi)
131
The
Problem: The FACADE Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FACADE
fear-based reaction you strive to make things look better than they really are.
Whether you are trying to protect yourself or someone else, you say what you
think others can handle, or what you feel they want to hear. You are, or can
appear to be, lacking integrity or lying.
You will
ask yourself or others “Why?” types of questions:
“Why me?”
… “Why can’t we just get along?”
“Nothing’s
wrong, why do you ask?”
When Negatively Consumed With
FEELINGS & EMOTIONS, Your Primary Characteristic Tends to Be WORRIED.
I say one thing to your face, but I’m thinking
something else.
Out loud, “I’m fine. I’m just fine.” Inside, “I’m
hurt and angry.” Out loud, “I’ll buy your product.” Inside, “I’ll
cancel tomorrow.”
Other
FACADE Characteristics:
Intimidated Defensive Phony Subordinate Guarded
Guilty Insecure Inferior Fragile Needy
The
Extreme FACADE Fear-Based Reaction: DEPENDENT
Ask yourself,
“Do I usually feel responsible for other’s
feelings?”
132
The
Solution: Add ETHICS
Be congruent by saying what you
really mean. Tell people WHAT is happening, and/or WHAT you are going to do.
You need to risk rejection, give others assurances, and let people know what
you are truly thinking and feeling. Never let your negative, emotions,
feelings, or issues get in the way of you creating “Desired Results”.
“Never mind if people don’t understand you,
so long as no one misunderstands you.”
Buckminster
Fuller
Balance yourself with...
Choose to Become:
Accountable Thorough Bold Efficient Decisive
Determined Congruent Focused Honest Confident
Become “RESULTS” Oriented
133
The Tool:
Creating Desired Results
Most people avoid setting goals.
There is a simple reason for this. When people set a goal and fail, they feel
defeated. The solution for many people, instead of learning from the
experience, is to stop setting goals.
It is a
little like the old joke, where a patient says, “Doctor, it hurts when I do this,”
and he raises his arm over his head. The doctor then replies, “Then don’t do that.”
Instead
of playing the old “goal-setting” game, we have changed the approach. If you
are competent at setting and achieving goals, this should increase your
effectiveness. If you have been struggling to achieve your goals, this system will
change everything for you.
NO MORE “GOAL
SETTING”
From now
on use the terminology—Creating Desired Results
It may
sound like semantics, and perhaps it is. Nevertheless, sometimes it is just a
matter of changing your perspective a little in order to get your brain to
cooperate. Open your mind and test out this technique. You will be amazed at
the results you will be able to achieve.
Summary for Creating Desired
Results
1. Important,
Challenging, and Positive
2. Achievable
3. Specific,
Measurable, Time-Sensitive Events
4. Balanced
5. Written
Down and Shared
6. Visualize
Nightly as if they are Already Achieved
7. Celebrate
Victories and Failures
8. Replaced
Each One as it is Achieved
134
The 7 Guidelines for Creating
Desired Results
1. Important, Challenging, and
Positive
Create important Desired Results.
Otherwise, the smallest obstacle will prevent their achievement. If you do not “own”
them, which is usually the case when they are chosen by someone else, your
commitment will be lacking. You must have a PASSION for Creating Desired
Results. Make them important and own them. As my father said, “If you are not excited about a goal, forget
about it.”
Create
challenging Desired Results. Beating-the-odds creates huge levels of satisfaction,
and makes further successes more likely. Desired Results which are
unchallenging will not create a sense of victory when achieved. Beating someone
at a game they have never played, for example, offers little satisfaction.
Create
positive Desired Results. A 220-pound person should be striving to weigh 199
pounds, not to lose 21 pounds. Focus on what you do want, not on what you do
not want.
2. Achievable
Create achievable Desired
Results. If you set them too high, denial and avoidance will tend to follow. As
you achieve them, set higher ones. Even if you only add slightly to your
previous victories, you will continue to grow and win. It is important that you
acknowledge all progress.
If you
have not read a book in 10 years, starting with Tolstoy will ensure
frustration. Start with something such as “Jonathan
Livingston Seagull”. If you have not exercised in 20 years, a marathon may
not be healthy. Start with a complete physical, then a light training regimen
designed to get you to the point where you can complete a 5K run/walk. With
consistency, you can easily build from there.
3. Specific, Measurable, Time Sensitive Events
Create specific Desired Results
that are measurable, time-sensitive events. For example, replace “Making more
money,” with “Selling $1,000,000 worth of widgets by December 31st,” so you
have a specific target to celebrate.
Creating
specific Desired Results requires you to focus on what you are going to
achieve, and not on how you are going to achieve it. As such, your effectiveness
will increase if you choose specific events such as completing a marathon or
exceeding your quota. Activities such as running every day or phoning your
existing clients weekly, are important and necessary, but are not the focus
here.
135
4. Balanced
Always be in the process of
Creating four (4) Desired Results ... one physical, one emotional, one mental,
and one spiritual. Balance is essential for you to Create Desired Results that
last.
PHYSICAL Desired Results:
Target something specific to do
to improve your health, appearance, energy, diet, fitness, calmness, or simply
to pamper yourself.
Examples:
Achieving a specific weight, becoming smoke-free, completing a 5K walk/run,
finishing a marathon, getting a physical or dental exam, treating yourself to a
manicure or a massage, or getting a facial or pedicure.
EMOTIONAL Desired Results:
These are events that you are
going to do “with” someone to improve the relationship (intimate, personal,
social, family, or business), but not “for” them. They should be things the
other person would enjoy or wants to accomplish; perhaps something that you
have been avoiding.
Examples:
Having a family outing, going on a date, phoning an old friend, having lunch
with a parent, going to a ball-game with a buddy, taking a long walk with a
child, or going on a get-away weekend or an intimate dinner with your spouse.
MENTAL Desired Results:
Here you choose things that will
improve your self-esteem, knowledge, career, or prosperity; or just for fun
(remember, “All work and no play makes
Jack a dull boy and Jane a dull girl.”).
Examples:
Making a big sale, graduating from college, completing a continuing-education
course, earning a specific sum of money, going on a vacation, exceeding your
quota, reading a book, going hot-air ballooning, cleaning the garage, balancing
your checkbook, going golfing, or finishing a project.
SPIRITUAL Desired Results:
Always strive to make a
difference “with” your life, not just “in” your life. These are to be things
you will do “for” someone else (unlike Emotional Desired Results, which are to
be done “with” someone else), perhaps anonymously.
Examples:
Donating money or volunteering time at a place of worship, giving away clothes
or furniture to a women’s shelter, reading to a shut-in, giving blood or
platelets, picking up litter, or joining the church choir. The concept here is
that pure “unconditional” giving always has a spiritual component.
136
5. Written Down and Shared
This is so simple, but most
people avoid it. Create written Desired Results. Write them down, and keep them
where you can see them on a daily basis.
As soon
as you have chosen your Desired Results, show them to someone. If possible,
make an agreement with that person to challenge you periodically on your
progress. Pick someone who will support you, someone who has no stake in the
outcome and who will not buy into any excuses. It is rarely a good idea for
this person to be your spouse or business partner. They are too close.
6. Visualize Nightly as if they are Already Achieved
Perhaps the most important
element of Creating Desired Results is to use your mind at night. Before
getting ready for bed, find a comfortable place to sit. Do this sitting up
because you may fall asleep if you lay down. Turn off the TV and, if possible,
play symphonic music.
Close
your eyes and visualize a structure … a workshop. This is an imaginary place
where you go to Create Desired Results. Inside this workshop is a wall-size TV
or movie screen. This is the “Screen of Your Mind”.
Every
night, visualize each one of your Desired Results on the Screen of Your Mind.
See them as if they had already been achieved earlier in the day. Then, imagine
how that would have made you feel. Play a “Back-to-the-Future” mind-game with
yourself. Make the feelings as real as possible.
When you
are finished, prepare for bed. Before you fall asleep, let your mind dwell upon
the images and the feelings you visualized earlier in your workshop on the Screen
of Your Mind.
As you
gain proficiency, your mind will provide you with insights and solutions as you
need them. Keep a journal or tape-recorder beside your bed. This way you can
make note of any insights or ideas you receive throughout the night, or the
first thing in the morning when you wake up.
7. Celebrate Victories and Failures
Celebrate your victories, no
matter how small. However, an important step in Creating Desired Results is to
also celebrate your failures. By looking for something to learn from each
failure, you increase your chances of future successes. That is worth
celebrating. The bottom line is that if you do not celebrate your failures, you
will be celebrating fewer successes ... guaranteed.
8. Replace Each One as it is Achieved
Whenever you achieve a Desired
Result, immediately create a new one to take its place. Do not wait for all
four to be completed. Long-term success depends on you keeping this as an
active process.
137
The Fired
Banker
“Ralph” was a banker in a major
metropolis. He made a mistake and was fired. After several unsuccessful
attempts to get a new job in banking, he came to me for coaching.
I told
him, “While banking is a large industry
in this city, it is a small fraternity.
Everyone knows what happened to you. Realistically, you either need to change
careers, or move to a different city.” I thought this was a reasonable strategy.
Ralph
disagreed, saying, “My wife’s family is
here, and I don’t want to leave banking.”
He had drawn his line in the sand, so to speak. Now I had to help him come up with a solution.
First, I said, “Let’s start at the beginning. Clearly, by
trying to say the right things to
prospective employers, you are coming across as insecure and phony. You need to
start using the power of your mind to overcome your insecurities. Tell me, how
will it feel to finally get past all these problems and land a good job?”
Ralph replied, “It
will be a relief. I will be excited. My wife will be ecstatic.” “OK. Here’s what I want you to do.” I
continued, “Before going to bed at
night,
visualize yourself shaking the hand of someone who has just offered you the job
you want … and create those feelings of relief and excitement.”
“Nope,” he
responded. “I have a better picture. Your
father has always said that the mental picture must be exciting. Sure it will
make me feel good to get back in banking, but what really excites me is the
thought of finally getting a Porsche.”
I thought
he was kidding. He was not. Nothing I could say would dissuade him. Finally,
Ralph said, “Look, for me to get a
Porsche, I will have to have a hell
of a job.” With this, I relented and helped him create his mental picture.
First I
said, “Close your eyes and imagine
yourself sitting in your brand new Porsche.”
Ralph let
out an audible sigh of pleasure. “Now
smell the interior. Sit on the leather
seats. Adjust the mirror. Most importantly, I want you to notice how you are
feeling.”
“Perfect,”
he responded with a grin.
“Turn on the engine and hear the sound. Feel the
sensation as you begin to drive. Notice people turning to look.” He was grinning ear to ear.
138
“That’s it,” I finally said. “Do this every
night until it is in your garage. I have never seen it fail. Remember, you have
to create this mental picture and the resulting feeling of excitement … as if
it were real … every night until it happens. No matter how long it takes.”
Ralph simply said, “I’ll do it.”
Less than
three weeks later, he had his job. His employers agreed to finance his new car.
It was a beauty. By using his mind before going to sleep, Ralph was able to
change his attitude and thinking so he could interview from strength instead of
desperation. This empowered him to land the job of his dreams.
The power
of the human mind is beyond measure. By using your mind at night to visualize
your desired results, you too can manifest your goals and dreams. It always
works.
Ethics is
about being accountable, honest,
and results oriented.
Creating
Desired Results is a learned skill. Use the following exercise to get started.
Long-term effectiveness will come with practice. Stick with it and you will
find profound value in learning and using this tool.
139
EXERCISE
#6 - Creating Desired Results
Create Four (4) Desired Results
... one physical, one emotional, one mental, one spiritual. Follow the
preceding guidelines, and for the first few months, keep them short-term (to be
achieved within 30 days or less). Once you have developed the discipline to
Create “Short-Term” Desired Results, you will find it much easier to Create “Long-Term”
Desired Results.
PHYSICAL – Create something for
wellness or energy.
(i.e. Have my semi-annual dental exam)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ Date To Be Completed: ___________
EMOTIONAL – Create something WITH
someone.
(i.e. Taking my kids to the zoo)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ Date To Be Completed: ___________
MENTAL – Create something for
prosperity, knowledge or fun.
(i.e Exceeding my sales quota)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ Date To Be Completed: ___________
SPIRITUAL – Create something FOR
someone.
(i.e. Donating blood)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ Date To Be Completed: ___________
140
ETHICS
When what
you THINK, what you SAY,
and what
you DO are all the same.
BOTTOM
LINE
When
worried, risk failure, but speak your truth.
Focus on behaviors which calmly and kindly assure others that you can be
counted on to “Create Desired Results”.
Somehow, some way – Get The Job Done.
“Chance favors the prepared mind.”
Louis Pasteur
“Live one day at a time, emphasizing ethics rather
than rules.” Dr. Wayne W. Dyer
“The first step in the evolution of ethics is
solidarity with other human beings.” Dr.
Albert Schweitzer
“My life works in direct proportion to the
commitments I make and keep.” James H.
Quinn
141
ENTHUSIASM
Seriousness
is a Curable Disease
“The only thing more contagious than enthusiasm,
is the lack of it.”
James H. Quinn
142
CHAPTER 7
ENTHUSIASM
The
Alternative to FREEZE
When stress triggers your FREEZE fear-based
reaction, you bite your tongue, hide in
your “cave,” shut down, become unresponsive, and basically shut everyone out.
You will become over-analytical and will not share your real thoughts or
feelings ... until you have figured everything out, or are certain it is safe
to do so. While the FREEZE fear-based reaction is often an attempt at
self-protection, it is sometimes a conscious choice designed to protect others.
When you
are shutting down, other people may or may not be your primary concern. While
you may just be sorting out your own thoughts, you could also be trying to get
back at someone by “freezing them out” and cutting off all communications. You
might be trying to get the upper hand in negotiations by making the other party
think you have lost interest in the deal, or you could be trying to protect
someone else.
Regardless
of your intent, the Freeze reaction can be threatening to others because they
have no way of knowing what is really going on with you. They have to guess,
and their assumptions can be much worse than the reality of whatever it is you
are trying to hide.
The FREEZE Fear-Based reaction often occurs with
people who feel they are overwhelmed.
Unfortunately,
this can trigger impatience from others.
There
seems to be no shortage of fear-based reactions in the world. A FREEZE
fear-based reaction can often trigger a FIGHT, FLIGHT, FREEZE or FACADE from
others. In fact, people may demonstrate their fear-based reactions even if they
only perceive you to be isolating.
Perhaps
you are not really shutting down or shutting them out, but are so focused on
solving a problem that they feel ignored or taken for granted. If someone feels
threatened they will react to you and the cycle begins. The problem you are
hiding from will only grow larger as you hope, in vain, that it
143
will just go away. Most of us
take ourselves much too seriously when we are demonstrating the FREEZE
fear-based reaction, and therefore procrastinate when faced with challenges.
Spontaneity is missing.
The
question becomes, “How can I move into
Enthusiasm, when I am in the middle
of a FREEZE fear-based reaction?” The answer: Tell people exactly how you are feeling and what you are
thinking, before you figure out exactly what to say. In other words, learn to “think-out-loud”.
Since the
extreme FREEZE fear-based reaction is to become AVOIDANT, my recommendation for
you to be enthusiastic may seem rash or even dangerous. This is difficult to
argue with, because the FREEZE fear-based reaction has one purpose …
protection. Whether you are protecting your thoughts, feelings, family,
business, or something else, it is all about protection.
The
demonstration of the FREEZE fear-based reaction often has its roots in
childhood or adolescence. Maybe you were told you were stupid when you blurted
out an idea, or perhaps you were being spontaneous and were told to “shut-up”. You may have even heard the
classic line, “What will the neighbors
think?” Perhaps you were teased or bullied, and found safety by staying invisible. Regardless of the
circumstance, you must have perceived at least some value in FREEZE fear-based
reactions in order for this behavior to become a habit.
However
secure it feels, the FREEZE reaction is still fear-based. Inappropriate people
and challenging circumstances trigger your “head in the sand” or “nose to the
grindstone” approaches to problems. You are only happy when circumstances are
perfect, and they are never perfect. Bottom line, you give up control of your
life when circumstances are in charge of your behavior.
When
tempted to Freeze,
take your
power back with Enthusiasm.
Realize
you are probably avoiding when you get
“Paralysis
by Analysis”.
Just as a
deer freezes in the headlights of an oncoming car, you are in danger when you
analyze yourself into immobility. To place yourself in this kind of “voluntary”
solitary confinement is to treat yourself in much the same way as society would
treat the worst of criminals. There is an element of self-punishment involved
when you isolate with the FREEZE fear-based reaction.
You do
not have to be alone to isolate … most of us have done so in a crowded room. In
personal relationships, one person may interpret a lack of enthusiasm from
their partner as a lack of affection. When someone feels rejected, unloved, or
taken for granted, they may feel they have no choice but to look for another
partner for warmth, attention, and affection. Destructive affairs and divorces
can result from an unmet need for excitement.
Likewise,
successful business relationships require enthusiastic interactions between
management, employees, vendors, clients, and prospects. Timely
144
responsiveness is often a signal
to others of their value, whether there has been a problem or not. When there
is a problem, people seem to have an inherent fear of the unknown, so even bad
news is often better than no news at all.
An “Autistic”
Adult
Some people are clear about their
strengths and weaknesses, yet may still benefit from looking deeper to find
gifts yet to be discovered and developed. Those with low self-esteem need to
realize that they actually have value. Often, their gifts are found amongst the
ruins of challenging life-circumstances.
“There is not anyone who cannot in some way add to
Universe and contribute to humanity.”
Buckminster
Fuller
NOTE: Buckminster Fuller never put the word ‘the’
in front of the word
‘universe’. He said it would indicate that there
are other universes.
When I
first met Jane, she could not look anyone in the eye. She was in her own world,
and nothing I could do could get her out of it. I began to wonder if she was an
autistic adult.
It took
two days of hard work before she was finally able to converse AND maintain
eye-contact when conversing. Jane even began to sport a lovely smile. It was
like watching a rose begin to blossom.
Then I
told the group we were going to examine our childhoods to discover a few of our
gifts. I said, “Some of your higher
qualities have been squashed, and you
have longed for their return. Others, you may have never known.” At this point, Jane crossed her arms and legs,
and again stared at the floor.
“What’s up Jane?” I asked. Then I asked it twice more before I got a response.
“Nothing,”
She said without lifting her
eyes.
“Come on Jane, please look at me
and tell us what is going on,” I asked. Reluctantly, she looked at me and said,
“I cannot do what you are asking. I
had an awful childhood, and I can’t bear to think
about it.”
“Okay, so what was it like?” I seldom leave well enough alone. She looked away and did not answer.
“Tell me why you are so shut down. What was it
like?” I
repeated. Jane just stared at the
floor.
“If you will not even talk about it, then there is
nothing to be accomplished here. I have to ask you to leave the class.” While I did not want Jane to leave, I felt if she did not take a leap of
faith now, it would matter little if she stayed.
145
Jane
glared at me and said, “You don’t
understand. I’m dying inside. I can’t leave.”
“Fine.
Then tell me why you are so shut down?” I responded.
Jane said, “Because
I can’t, and I won’t.”
“Then you
have to leave the class.” I
replied.
“I can’t
leave. I need this class. I am dying.” Jane was pleading now.
“Then
tell me why you are so shut down.” I
repeated.
“You don’t understand what you’re asking. I have been in therapy for 10
years. My therapist has never gotten me to talk about my childhood, and you
expect me to talk about it? Just like that?” She was shouting.
“Yes,” was my reply.
Just like that, Jane opened up
and told us of a childhood of isolation and sexual abuse. I will not go into
the details, but it was the worst story of childhood abuse and neglect that I
had ever heard. Basically, she was either ignored or molested. Jane remembered
little else.
She was never praised, hugged,
nurtured, or given a present of any sort. Jane was even ignored on her
birthdays. In fact, she told us, “The
only thing I had to play with was a
doll I made out of a few sticks and some rags. That doll was the only one I
could talk to. That’s how sick my childhood was. I finally left home at
15. No one
even cared about that.”
“How
wonderful,” I
responded. My tone was not sarcastic, but gentle. I was
filled with admiration.
Jane did not understand, however,
and asked, “What’s wonderful about that?”
I said, “You were treated as nothing. You
were used, hurt, and isolated. Given the
same circumstances, I doubt if I would have been as strong. I would have
probably just wallowed in self-pity or jumped off of a building. But you chose
to do something about it. You made a doll so you could have a friend. That is
powerful.
Tell me, what did you name her?”
She was shocked, “How did you know I named her?”
“Simple,” I
replied. “Nobody with your courage and
determination would not name the doll. How wonderful that you didn’t kill
yourself to escape your life of pain. Not only that, you left home and educated
yourself. You have a good job, a nice home, and have spent 10 years in therapy
trying to find yourself. Jane, you have greatness in you.”
At first, Jane looked confused,
but then she smiled. Had I asked her to define her best qualities, courage,
determination, and greatness would not have been among her responses.
Nevertheless, these qualities were obvious to me. I reached her by simply
sharing the truth about what I saw in her, and by giving her time to let it
soak in.
After the two hours it had taken
to get through this sharing, Jane was ready for anything. Talking about the
rest of her life was easy. She had always dreamed of having a husband, but
feared abandonment. She desperately longed for children, but feared her own
childhood would become their destiny.
Jane also had ideas for her own
business. Unfortunately, her feelings of unworthiness and fear of rejection had
prevented her from making it a reality.
Talking about her childhood did
not eliminate its pain, or her fears of being hurt again. While still terrified
of the other people in the seminar, Jane suddenly became one of the leaders of
the class. Living her life under a bushel basket had kept her safe, but it had
suffocated her. Jane simply made a decision not to live
146
that way anymore. From that time
onward, she was the first to share, quickest to question, and was always
willing to challenge others. It was a remarkable transformation.
I do not
always see the end results of my seminars, but it is particularly gratifying to
hear from people who have completely turned their lives around. Five years
later, Jane wrote to me.
The
letter spoke of my challenge for her to quit wallowing in self-pity and to do
something with her life. Jane said that after class she entered and graduated
from a business college, and then met and married a wonderful man. Not only
that, her life-long dream of having a child had been fulfilled.
I went on
to read that this terrified and unworthy woman had also created her own
successful business. I will never forget her closing words …
Ross,
I promised myself I would write you when I felt
successful. Yesterday I hired my 100th employee and I want you to know how successful I feel.
Thank you
for believing in me.
Love,
Jane
147
ENTHUSIASM
If you do not have enthusiasm,
not much else matters. To live with enthusiasm is to have the energy to enjoy
life. The personal rewards of living enthusiastically can be great. Problems
become opportunities to create joy. Even daily exercise can become fun.
The Great Masters have never said,
“Seriousness
To The World.”
They have
only and always said,
“Joy To The World.”
The
effect of enthusiasm on others is, perhaps, more significant. An unenthusiastic
speech or sales-presentation is boring, regardless of the importance of its
content. Conversely, even a poor speech has some impact when delivered with
enthusiasm.
One of my
favorite moments from a leadership seminar occurred when a dyslexic student
took up a challenge to deliver a speech. No amount of practicing was helping.
In fact, the more he worked on it, the worse his condition became.
I watched
him fumble with sections of the speech he had already learned. I tried to help,
but he became so frustrated he literally had trouble remembering his name.
Finally, I told him as long as he was certain he was going to screw it up, he
might as well do so with enthusiasm. Have some fun with it. “After all,” I told him, “They pay Jim Carrey about $20,000,000 a
movie to act dumb. Perhaps being
perfect is not all it is cracked up to be.”
He
thanked me and said he would make it fun. I was not certain if he was going to
pull this off. Nonetheless, he was determined to give it his best shot.
However,
from the moment he began, I knew it was going to be a wonderful speech. He had
decided to change the beginning so the audience would understand what he was
going through. He started with a joke. “Have
you heard of the new organization
called DAM,” he began. “It stands for
Mother’s Against Dyslexia.” I could not believe it. This serious,
self-conscious man was making fun of
his disorder.
His
speech was titled “Courage”, and was
written by William Penn Patrick after he failed to become the Republican
candidate in the 1966 race for the Governor of California (he lost to Ronald
Reagan). Honestly, of the dozens of times I have heard it delivered, I have
never seen it messed up so badly. Nonetheless, his speech was one of the best I
have ever heard.
We were
not laughing at him, we were laughing with him. He also made us cry. People
hung on his every word, even when he had to try the same sentence
148
several times. The courage he
showed to us easily exceeded the courage he spoke of. His points got made,
people understood his message, and we even had some fun.
In this
story, it is important to note that even though this serious man did not
eliminate his dyslexia or his terror, he was able to create enthusiasm and
deliver his message in spite of that fact. He was entertaining and informative,
and as motivational as you can get.
Certainly, enthusiasm alone is
not enough. However, when those in leadership positions try to “motivate the
troops”, they had better do so enthusiastically.
Not only does leadership without enthusiasm usually fail, the lack of
enthusiasm can create even bigger problems with an unmotivated staff or team.
In a
business world that moves at “Internet” speed, delays can be fatal. It is rare
to find only one correct solution to a problem or challenge. Success in
business often requires assumptions, risk, and enthusiasm.
Leaders,
by definition, have followers. People are your barometer. Excellence is evident
when you attract people who support, befriend, love, or endorse you.
149
The
Problem: The FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating the FREEZE
fear-based reaction you become analyzing, isolated, and generally avoid others.
Whether you are trying to get something right, figure something out, or avoid a
relationship … you do not even speak until you have had the time to collect
your thoughts. You are, or can appear to be, disconnected from others.
You will
hear yourself internally asking “How” types of questions:
“How can
you say that to me?”
“How can
I do all of this?”
When Negatively Consumed With TASKS,
Your Primary Characteristic Tends to Be
OVERWHELMED.
“I don’t want to talk about it.” “In the time it
takes to explain, I can do it myself.” “If you can’t say something nice, don’t
say anything at all.”
Other
FREEZE Characteristics:
Anxious Inward Picky Withdrawn Apprehensive
Serious Shameful Tense Isolated Shut-Down
The
Extreme FREEZE Fear-Based Reaction: AVOIDANT
Ask yourself,
“Do I generally avoid confrontation?”
150
The
Solution: Add ENTHUSIASM
Make something happen. Focus on
WHO to spend time with and WHEN you need to do so. You probably need to play,
give others your full attention, and let people “IN” to your world. Quit
worrying about HOW everything will work out. Planning your spontaneity can help
remove some of the unknowns.
There are no problems that you can’t make worse --
alone.
Balance yourself with ENTHUSIASM ...
Choose to
Become:
Spontaneous Energetic Promoting Open Expressive
Positive Exciting Creative Stimulating Persuasive
Make TIME for RELATIONSHIPS
151
The Tool:
Planned Spontaneity
Adherence to the old adage, “Look before you leap” has saved many
people from making terrible decisions. The problem with the FREEZE fear-based
reaction is the tendency to become too analyzing.
Yes,
action without thinking can be dangerous, but thinking without action is nearly
pointless. Sometimes, it is okay if everything is not perfect.
Occasionally, spontaneity is necessary. Every now and then you need to
get a little crazy, or you will go nuts.
One of my
more analytical students came up with a solution, which worked well for him.
Everything in this man’s life was planned. His wife was originally attracted to
him because of his stability.
Now
however, she was beginning to see him as boring. He, on the other hand, was
resenting her for trying to have fun with him when he was busy. He knew this
was not smart, but could not bring himself to change.
He was in
danger of losing the only woman he had ever loved. Try as he might, his
projects always had to be finished before he could relax and enjoy himself.
Since completing projects was not his strong suit, and starting new projects
was never a problem, there was never any point of completion.
Then a
solution occurred to him. He decided to treat his wife with the same energy as
a project. He knew what she needed was some occasional fun, so he began to plan
spontaneous fun things to do with her.
That’s
right, “Planned Spontaneity.” He actually scheduled time to be spontaneous. It
sounded ridiculous, but it worked.
Since he
was impeccable with his appointments, once he booked some play time with his
wife, it became a priority. He stopped resisting her.
Here is
how it worked. At the beginning of the week, he would find a couple of hours of
open time and book it as if it were a business appointment. Then, he would
think about what kind of event he would create. He might plan to take his wife
to a movie at a nearby theatre, go for a walk, or visit some friends. Once it
was entered in his weekly planner, he could let it go.
When the
scheduled time arrived, he would find his wife and tell her he wanted to take
her to a movie. Whatever was showing was what they saw. Sure they saw some
movies they hated, but sometimes they discovered a film they really loved, that
would otherwise never have seen.
This began to work so well, he decided to start
creating fun in another way.
This
stiff, serious man began to teach himself how to juggle.
After a
while he became pretty good at it. Now, when he finds himself in a long line at
the supermarket, instead of reading the tabloids he starts to juggle
152
something. He usually makes new friends in the
process. Eventually, he even began to teach others to juggle.
Their marriage has healed. He is still a
workaholic, but he is a lot more fun. His wife never knows what to expect.
Sometimes, he surprises her with a
flower, dinner at a new restaurant, or even an
unplanned trip. There is no longer any danger of her thinking of him as boring.
“Seriousness is a disease. Fortunately, it’s
curable.”
James H.
Quinn
153
EXERCISE #7 - Plan Something
Spontaneous
1)
Plan an
hour of spontaneity, and book it into your schedule. This must be something
fun, and you must do this WITH someone you care about (Journal the experience).
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
2)
Identify
something you are procrastinating or avoiding, and then DO IT RIGHT NOW ...
with the energy and enthusiasm you would have for something you love to do.
(Journal the experience).
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
154
ENTHUSIASM
Always
remember, without movement you stagnate.
So don’t
just sit there analyzing.
Do something!
BOTTOM LINE
When overwhelmed, instead of shutting down, do something spontaneous ...
even if you have to plan it in advance.
“You can do anything if you have enthusiasm.”
Henry Ford
“Nothing great was ever achieved without
enthusiasm.” Ralph Waldo Emerson
“Enthusiasm is a vital element toward the
individual success
of every man or woman.”
Conrad Hilton
“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run
over if you just sit there.” Will
Rogers
155
EVALUATION
Misstakes r Larning Exspeariences
“Learning isn’t a means to an end; it is an end in
itself.”
Robert A. Heinlein
156
CHAPTER 8
EVALUATION
The
Alternative to FLIGHT
When we find it impossible to face challenging situations, sometimes we
have FLIGHT fear-based reactions. Examples would include running away from a
relationship or abruptly quitting a job without a clear plan for a new one.
Sometimes it manifests in the form of “running off at the mouth”.
When you
have a FLIGHT fear-based reaction, you may make comments as: “I can’t talk now”; “I’ll take care of it later”;
“It’s not my fault I’m late”; or “Forget
the plan, I have an idea”. When you get frantic, other people’s plans, goals, or needs are not your primary
concern. You feel as though you are painted into a corner and are only
interested in getting out. Unfortunately, your FLIGHT fear-based reaction often
provides the justification for others to react to you.
If you
are chronically late, then you already know that ignoring or avoiding problems
does not make them go away, and procrastination invariably makes them worse.
Problems cannot improve if they are not addressed. The FLIGHT fear-based
reaction practically guarantees eventual disruption and chaos in the lives of
others, who will then point to your behavior as their justification for
attacking, shutting down, running away, or lying to you (Fight, Flight, Freeze
or Facade).
The faster I go, the “be-hinder” I get.
People
may react to you even if you just appear to be frantic. Perhaps you are firmly
dug into your “Enthusiasm” mode. Not frazzled, but so intent on your problems
that others feel unappreciated, used, or walked-on. If this threatens someone,
it will begin the Reactive Cycle. They will react to you and then you react to
them, and so on.
The human mind is quite possibly the
most incredible creation in the
157
universe. It allows us to
evaluate our actions and make changes to our behaviors, in order to create
beneficial results. Unfortunately, people will never find personal or business
success as long as their mind-set is on scarcity, insecurity, unworthiness,
lack, status quo, or any number of other issues.
We have
all been taught to learn from our mistakes. Self-evaluation and the willingness
to change are vital for personal and professional development. Unfortunately,
for most people mistakes are not learning experiences, because they repeat
non-productive, negative, and even destructive behaviors.
Evaluation
begins with determination. You have to know that somehow you will become a
successful salesperson, a good parent, a great manager, or a happy spouse.
Failure and mistakes are not the problem. The problem is repeating them. The
solution is learning from your mistakes, and doing something different the next
time.
The best
salespeople have one thing in common: after each sales call, whether successful
or unsuccessful, they review their performance. These people evaluate the good
and the bad to find things deserving acknowledgement, as well as to find things
to improve.
If you
want to get something different, you must do something different. Overcoming
issues and learning from mistakes requires a mind-set for self-improvement.
Without honest self-evaluation, the power of your mind will be reduced to
rationalizing your own behaviors. Nothing will change. Your answers require a
determination to grow.
“People are a lot like fruit.
When they’re green, they grow. When they’re ripe,
they rot.”
Bernard
Beruce (Also the motto of Ray Kroc)
It has
been observed that placing a piece of fruit in a jar that is tied down can
capture monkeys. When a monkey reaches his hand into the jar, he discovers he
cannot get his hand back out without dropping his prize. Instead of letting go
of the fruit and running away as humans approach, he clings to it until he
loses his freedom.
Most
people are willing to try to make a job or marriage work, but really do not
change what they are doing. They cling to behaviors that have already proven to
be ineffective.
Reportedly,
Thomas Edison tried thousands of experiments before his incandescent bulb
actually worked. Notice, he tried thousands of different experiments. If Edison
had repeated only the same experiment he would have been passed over by
history. We all need to evaluate and learn from our failures in order to grow.
Ideas for
evaluation typically come from taking an objective look at yourself,
considering both the positive and negative feedback from others. One very
effective way to do this is to take the time to journal a couple of paragraphs
of observations, feelings, and insights at the end of each day. Afterwards,
meditate
158
on what you have written.
Without
taking the time to reflect on potential solutions and keeping your priorities
straight, you may hurry to an appointment, quit a job, or divorce a spouse in
an attempt to avoid stress. Unfortunately, if your peace of mind is controlled
by a circumstance, changing or controlling your circumstance only provides a
temporary solution.
The Real
Estate Salesman
Jim was usually the first person
to arrive in his real estate office. This was a good thing since he always
seemed to be behind in his paperwork. This morning he was meeting with a new
client.
Bob spoke
slowly and had difficulty describing the property he wished to purchase. Jim
kept probing and questioning in an attempt to find out what this guy wanted,
hardly waiting for Bob to finish his sentences. When the meeting was over, they
made an appointment to go look at properties the next day after lunch.
That
night, Jim poured over his Multiple-Listings book (this story takes place in
the pre-computer era). He identified six different properties he felt would
please his client.
The next
day Jim had a long lunch with the local merchant’s association. He did the best
he could, but got to his office 20 minutes late for his appointment. Bob was
not disturbed by his lateness, but seemed eager to get started. Jim, on the
other hand, was already thinking ahead to his next commitment to meet with another
client in two hours. They had to hurry if Bob wished to see all the properties.
At the
first stop, Jim knew he was in trouble. Bob slowly wandered through the house
examining everything in minute detail. His slow drawl was beginning to
frustrate Jim. Finally, after unsuccessfully showing all six houses, they got
back to the office. Jim found his next appointment waiting impatiently for him.
He made
another appointment with Bob. This time Jim made the appointment his last of
the day, so it would not get in the way of other clients. Jim stayed up later
than usual, selecting eight more properties from his Multiple-Listing book.
159
True to
form, and after an exhausting morning, Bob still had not found the home he was
looking for. After five meetings, and four days of looking at homes, was about
to cut his losses and tell Bob to work with another realtor. That is when he
called me.
As I
listened to Jim share his frustrations, an idea struck me. I suggested Jim give
Bob his Multiple-Listing book, and let him take it home to study overnight.
Back
then, in the era before the Internet, you never let the client look through the
Multiple-Listing book as they would become overwhelmed with options. More
importantly, it was not supposed to leave the realtor’s office. Jim resisted my
idea until he realized he had nothing to lose by giving it a try.
The next
day Jim said, “Bob, instead of running
all over town again today, I’d like
you to take my Multiple-Listing book home. I want you to look through it and
see if you can find something I’ve been missing.” Bob’s eyes lit up like a Christmas tree.
The
following morning, Jim came into the office to find Bob waiting. He had found
the perfect home and did not want to wait for someone else to get it first. Jim
was a little perplexed. The home Bob had chosen was quite a bit more expensive
than the upper limit he had been given. Jim would have already shown this home
if he had known.
As they
visited the property, Bob was as excited as a child opening presents.
Everything was perfect and the sale closed quickly. It was one of Jim’s largest
sales of the year.
By taking
the time to let Bob evaluate his own needs and desires, Jim allowed Bob to
answer all of his own questions and objections in his own time. As a result,
Jim never quite got around to the Flight reaction (dumping one prospect in
favor of a better one).
Remember,
when you are about to employ the Flight reaction, come from Evaluation instead.
The answer, when frantic, is to stop and clear your mind. Your priorities will
become clear and you will generally save more time than you had feared you
might lose.
Lasting
answers are to be found by changing yourself.
When
stressed, calm down and do things differently than normal.
160
EVALUATION
When you find yourself
frantically trying to accomplish more than can possibly be done, you may
actually be fleeing from your problems instead of facing them. Here is a simple
way to change that pattern. The next time you find yourself in crisis mode,
stop and reflect on the reason you made a commitment, started a job, agreed to
a project, or entered a relationship. Those desires or needs are probably going
to go unfulfilled if you break your integrity, and you will eventually find
yourself in the same frantic position in the next circumstance or relationship.
“Every time I left a marriage,
everything I was running from got to the next
relationship
before I
did.”
A former
student after her 4th divorce.
Since the
extreme Flight reaction is to become histrionic (hysterical, frantic, and out
of control), the choice to come from Evaluation seems impossible, and is
resisted because of the immediate time crunch. This is difficult to argue with,
because the Flight reaction has one purpose … self-protection.
When
confronted with problems, you would naturally tend toward Evaluation unless you
have found some value in the Flight reaction. Perhaps by being frantic, you
became difficult to pin down and, therefore, difficult to call on the carpet
for broken agreements. Perhaps you found it easier to walk away from challenges
and problems rather than face them. Others may have started solving your
problems when you went into panic mode.
Whatever
the reason, the Flight reaction is a form of fear-based living. If you choose
to cling to this reaction, you are allowing other people to determine your
peace. Unless you find a way to change, you will continue to react frantically
when stressed. Begin by examining how you can keep your word or how to create
what you originally wanted. Take the time to make plans. Make major changes
slowly and with great consideration. Stop and prioritize what is important, and
then finish one thing at a time … especially when it seems impossible to do so.
161
The
Problem: The FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FLIGHT
fear-based reaction you panic, make excuses, rush, motor-mouth, or interrupt
others. Whether you are trying to find something for someone, make it to an
appointment, or get away from someone … you say the first thing that comes to
your mind. You are, or can appear to be, not listening to anyone else.
You will
hear yourself asking “Who?” or “When?” types of questions:
“Who do
you think you are?”… “Who is going to be there?”
“When is
the appointment?”… “When will you finally start listening to me?”
When
Negatively Consumed With RELATIONSHIPS,
Your
Primary Characteristic Tends to Be FRANTIC.
“I don’t have to take this, I’m out of here.” “Don’t
worry about it. I’ll take care of it later.” “I’ve got too much to do and not
enough time to do it.”
Other
FLIGHT Characteristics:
Distracted
Overwhelming Harried Panicked
Hyperactive Impulsive
Hurried Excitable
Pushy Scattered
The
Extreme FLIGHT Fear-Based Reaction: HISTRIONIC (Frenzied)
Ask yourself,
“Do I easily become panicked?”
162
The
Solution: Add EVALUATION
Solicit ideas and feedback, and
actually consider what you hear. Take the time to figure out HOW you created
this stress, and HOW to prevent it in the future. You need to slow down, give
others information, and let others help you. Remember the moral from Aesop’s
Fable, The Tortoise and the Hare … “Slow
and steady wins the race.”
“When your stomach disputes you,
lie down and pacify it with cool thoughts.”
Satchel
Paige
Balance yourself with EVALUATION ...
Choose to Become:
Patient Diligent Reliable Industrious Methodical
Detailed Persistent Integral Precise Deliberate
Focus on TASKS and COMMITMENTS
163
The Tool:
Centering
The reduction, “re-direction,” or
elimination of stress is essential in the modern world. There are many ways to
accomplish this objective. Examples include prayer, exercise, sports,
gardening, and hobbies; as well as meditations such as Centering, Christian
Contemplation, and Transcendental Meditation.
Almost
any discipline is effective, as long as it gets your mind off your troubles.
Two things which do NOT work are 1) becoming consumed with your problems, or 2)
avoiding them with drugs, alcohol, shopping, food, work-a-holism, or any
escapist/avoid-ant activities.
I
practice and teach a safe, simple, and effective “Rainbow Centering” technique.
This powerful tool aids people in Stress Reduction when used for SELF-DISCOVERY
in the morning; and for CREATING DESIRED RESULTS (Chapter 6, page 134), when
used in the evening.
During
the day, in periods of high stress, even one or two minutes of centering can be
highly beneficial. Quiet spots may be hard to come by, but there are private
restrooms almost everywhere (and they are quiet too).
If you
practice the Rainbow Centering technique twice a day for 21 days, it will begin
to feel as natural as brushing your teeth, putting on make-up, or shaving. You
will find that by centering in this manner for about 15 minutes in the morning
and 15 minutes in the evening (but even 5 minutes has great value), that you
will increase your personal and professional effectiveness dramatically.
EXERCISE
#8 - CENTERING
Sit with your feet flat on the
floor. Move your feet slightly forward so your ankles are directly beneath your
knees. Open your palms, as if you are holding a huge beach ball on your lap.
Lift your chin so that your eyes are elevated slightly above the horizon. Push
your shoulders back and straighten your spine.
If you
prefer to lie down, position yourself as follows to maximize your results and
prevent yourself from falling asleep. Lay on the floor, not on your bed (old
sleep patterns are difficult to overcome). Lift your knees, keeping your feet
flat on the floor. Arch your neck slightly, as if to look at the top of the
wall behind you. Spread your arms out from your sides, just slightly apart from
your torso. Lift one hand, with your elbow remaining on the ground. If your
hand starts getting heavy, simply change hands.
You may
find it beneficial to make a recording of the following procedure. I also
recommend that you play soft, symphonic music, or sounds from nature to help
create a supportive environment. Several different Centering CDs are available
on my website: www.LoveBasedLeader.com.
164
Step One -- Relax Your Physical Body:
Close your eyes and visualize
something RED from nature, perhaps, an apple or a rose. Use this color as a
mental trigger device to relax your physical body. While keeping the color red
in your mind’s eye, relax every muscle in your body. Start from the top of your
head and finish with your feet. Imagine yourself with no muscles or joints.
Step Two -- Release Your Emotions:
Visualize something ORANGE from
nature, such as an orange or a flower. This color is the mental trigger device
to release and let go of negativity. While keeping the color orange in your
mind’s eye, feel yourself getting lighter as you “watch” negative emotions such
as resentment flow away.
Step Three -- Calm Your Mind:
Visualize something YELLOW from
nature, perhaps a banana or a flower. Use this color as a mental trigger device
to calm and still your mind. While visualizing the color yellow, slow your mind
down. Clear your mind of all negative thoughts, and watch them float away like
yellow clouds.
Step Four -- Sense Inner Peace:
Visualize something GREEN from
nature, such as a lawn or a tree. Use this color as a mental trigger device to
sense inner peace. Allow yourself to experience an indwelling presence of peace
and serenity.
Step Five -- Feel Love:
Then visualize something BLUE
from nature, perhaps the sky or a sapphire. This color is the mental trigger
device for feeling the emotion of love. As you visualize the color blue in your
mind’s eye, feel love radiating to you and through you to others, as if you are
a living conduit of love.
Step Six -- Seek Wisdom:
Visualize something PURPLE from
nature, such as the deep indigo color of eggplants or grapes. This color is the
mental trigger device for aspiration. While keeping the color purple in your
mind’s eye, seek out the unique genius within yourself and listen for insights
regarding your gifts and true purpose.
Step Seven -- Be Centered:
Visualize something VIOLET from
nature, perhaps orchids or tiny violets. Use this color as the mental trigger
device for being centered. Accept that all people have gifts, value, and
purpose … regardless of whether they realize it or not.
Step Eight (Mornings) -- Listen to Your Inner Voice:
Experience whatever you are led
to experience. Allow yourself to be still and quiet for several minutes.
Answers and ideas may come to mind, but if not, just
165
use the time to relax. If you
find it difficult to do nothing with your mind, then visualize yourself as a
child freely demonstrating your gifts (such as Boldness, Enthusiasm,
Determination, or Caring) to others. Either way, just let go.
Step Eight (Evenings) – Visualize Success:
Imagine you are entering your
Workshop and then visualize each of your Desired Results on the Screen of Your
Mind. Remember to see each result as if it is already achieved, and to create
the feelings you would have had ... if it actually had been achieved (see
Chapter 6, Page 137 – Visualize Nightly
as if they are Already Achieved).
Step Nine -- Ending:
State the
following affirmation:
Each day,
in every way, I am getting better and better and better.
Then, slowly visualize the seven colors of the
rainbow
in reverse sequence:
Starting
with the inner most color Violet,
moving
upwards and out to Purple,
next to Blue, then Green,
next Yellow, Orange, and Red.
As you open your eyes, repeat the following:
I open my eyes and I am wide awake.
I am revitalized, refreshed, and in tune with life.
I am enlightened. I am enriched. I am enthused. I
am energized.
I am. I
just am.
166
EVALUATION
Listen to
your unique “Genius” within.
BOTTOM
LINE
When
overwhelmed, instead of getting hyper,
take the
time to “Center” and get clear on your priorities.
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the
rational mind is a faithful servant.” Albert
Einstein
“Look before you leap.”
Samuel Butler
“Balance lives in the present. Bring yourself back
to the now.” Oprah Winfrey
“And he awoke and rebuked the wind and said to the
sea,
‘Peace! Be still!’.”
Jesus, Mark 4:39 English Standard Version of The
Holy Bible
167
EMPATHY
Acceptance
Not Judgment
“People don’t care how much you know,
until they know how much you care.”
Unknown
168
CHAPTER 9
EMPATHY
The
Alternative to FIGHT
When you have a FIGHT fear-based reaction, you tend to be brutally
honest, critical, or sarcastic. It is generally triggered by judgmental or
self-righteous thoughts and feelings, and can take the form of sarcasm,
criticism, verbal abuse, and worse. “I
don’t get mad, I get even,” could be your motto.
While a
FIGHT fear-based reaction is usually either an attempt at self-protection, or a
punishment dealt out to others, it is often motivated by the desire to protect
others from themselves. You can justify attacking the very people you care
about, and blame them for it. “This is
for your own good”; “This is going to hurt
me more than it’s going to hurt you,”; “I’m only yelling at you because you
were yelling at me!” are phrases you may have used to justify yourself.
Your
FIGHT fear-based reactions often are triggered by anger, which can lead you to
make truthful but negative comments such as,
“You are a liar”; “Do it this way, or
you’re fired”; “Your problem is you only think of yourself”; “I can’t trust you”
or “I’m tired of your excuses.”
When you
are angry and demonstrating the FIGHT fear-based reaction by telling someone off
or putting them down, the feelings and needs of your target are not your
primary concern … you just want to tell the truth. Unfortunately, your FIGHT
fear-based reaction provides justification for the fear-based reactions of
others, which will begin or escalate the Reactive Cycle (page 63).
“Never get angry. Never make a threat. Reason with
people.”
Don
Corleone, The Godfather
169
It is
easy to see how resistance and resentment are typical reactions to the FIGHT
fear-based reaction. Nobody likes to be yelled at, bullied, or pushed around,
even when his or her own reactive behavior may have triggered an angry reaction
in turn. No matter how justified your outrage, people will tend to react badly
to you when they see you as angry or judgmental. The Fight reaction practically
guarantees you will be attacked, ignored, lied to, or abandoned.
Using
Empathy to overcome this reaction can be difficult, as you must have perceived
your FIGHT Reactions as valuable in order to have developed them in the first
place. Nevertheless, Empathy is the solution for overcoming FIGHT fear-based
reactions.
However
strong it appears now, the FIGHT reaction is still fear-based. Other people
trigger your negative behaviors. If they treat you right, you do not attack. If
they do not treat you right, you attack. The bottom line is you are at the
mercy of how other people treat you. You are not in charge of yourself when you
demonstrate the Fight Reaction.
The irony
is that you could not have developed FIGHT fear-based reactions unless you were
very sensitive. Whether you remember it or not, you would not be reacting in
such a manner unless you were hurt in the past. When you showed kindness, you
might have been laughed at. There may have been a time you tried to give love,
but were rejected. Perhaps you were creative, but were criticized. Maybe you
needed someone who abandoned you. Regardless, you eventually felt a need to
protect yourself. This is where the FIGHT fear-based reaction started.
Then it got
stronger with success. Perhaps getting mad stopped people from picking on you,
or arrogance helped you to bury hurt from a relationship gone bad. Maybe you
were even taught that “nice guys finish
last.”
The FIGHT
fear-based reaction has one purpose … to protect you. But, if you have ever
yelled in frustration, “If I’ve told you
once, I’ve told you a thousand times,”
then you know how ineffective the FIGHT fear-based reaction truly is. Otherwise, your point would have been
made long before you shouted it 999 times.
If you
don’t change what you are doing,
you are
going to end up where you are heading.
The
extreme FIGHT fear-based reaction is to become paranoid. Is that where you
really want to end up?
The
answer, when you are engaged in the FIGHT fear-based reaction, is to say
exactly what you were going to snarl or shout, but do so with kindness and
respect. If what you are trying to communicate is important, say it in a way in
which the intended receiver will hear it. Simply change HOW you say it, by
adding Empathy.
170
EMPATHY
To lack empathy is to deny your
own need for others. Abraham Maslow, in his famous “Hierarchy of Needs” defined
one of the key motivators of human behavior as the “belonging need” or the need
for people. Friendships, marriages, co-workers, religious acquaintances,
comrades in arms, teammates, siblings, and anyone having similar interests can
fill this need.
All
relationships have problems. With empathy, you do not start with the premise
that the other person is an idiot, incompetent, or evil, just because you do
not understand them. To do that is to guarantee your attempts to reach them,
much less help them, will fail. You will not lead, as your reactions will be
counter-productive to your aims and desires.
Empathy
is the ability to relate to the feelings, emotions,
thoughts,
actions, and circumstances of others.
Even with
empathy, you may not always comprehend why someone is behaving in a
non-constructive or destructive manner. But you will understand that it somehow
makes sense to them.
Many
confuse empathy with sympathy, but they are very different. Just as with a
sympathetic toothache, when the pain from one tooth feels like it is also
coming from another tooth, a sympathetic person actually feels the pain of
another. For example, a friend loses a job and is resenting his or her manager,
so you resent the boss as well. If you feel bad, I feel bad. “I can’t understand why your
boss fired you. He is such an idiot.”
With
empathy, on the other hand, you understand how another feels, but it does not
make you feel the same way. “I understand
your resentment for your boss, but
resenting him is eating you up inside.”
Love-based
leaders do not take advantage of, ignore, or attack other people. They realize
there will be consequences to their fear-based reactions. Accordingly,
love-based leaders know that their reactions could cause valuable people to
leave the relationship, and that dangerous ones could mount a counter-attack.
Either way, they realize that a price will be paid.
171
The
Problem: The FIGHT Fear-Based Reaction
When demonstrating a FIGHT
fear-based reaction you give ultimatums, get sarcastic, become vengeful, yell,
or even attack someone physically. Whether you are actively seeking to fix
something, finish something, or punish someone … you say exactly what you mean.
You are, or can appear to be, unconcerned about the needs and feelings of
others.
You will
hear yourself asking “What?” types of questions:
“What’s
your problem?” … “What are you going to do about it?”
When
Negatively Consumed With RESULTS,
Your
Primary Characteristic Tends to Be JUDGMENTAL.
“I don’t get mad, I get even.”
“If you want something done right, you’ve got to do
it yourself.”
“The end justifies the means.”
Other
FIGHT Characteristics:
Aggressive
Manipulative Arrogant Sarcastic
Critical Demanding
Intimidating Insensitive Offensive
Argumentative
The
Extreme FIGHT Fear-Based Reaction: PARANOID
Ask yourself,
“Do I tend to be blunt with criticism and judgment?”
172
The
Solution: Add EMPATHY
Avoid judgment and telling people
WHAT to do. Look for something to acknowledge. Take the time to explain WHY to
others, or to ask WHY type questions. You need to forgive, give others
courtesy, and let people give to you. Remember, it isn’t what you say; it’s how
you say it.
"Tenderness and kindness are not signs of
weakness and despair, but manifestations of strength and resolutions."
Kahlil Gibran “The Prophet”
Balance yourself with EMPATHY ...
Choose to
Become:
Courteous Supportive Cooperative Responsive Kind
Friendly Accommodating Nurturing Compassionate Accepting
Focus on
EMOTIONS and FEELINGS
173
The New
Car Dealer
Tom was the owner of the largest
car dealership in the city, but he had a problem. Tom had a good location,
superb mechanics, excellent sales-people, but an inconsistent body shop. He finally
found a small operation nearby, with an owner-operator who did impeccable work.
However, it was not under his direct control. As a hands-on manager, Tom wanted
to have the body work done in-house.
After
several years resisting Tom’s offers to work for him, the body shop man
relented, and agreed to work for the dealership. It was a classic win-win
agreement: Tom got an employee he could be proud of; his new employee got a
state-of-the-art facility, and was given a free hand to run it as he saw fit.
Shortly
afterwards, Tom’s best friend had an accident with his new car. He needed it
repaired for his anniversary the following weekend. He assured his friend that
not only would the car be ready, but also that his new employee would make it
look like new.
Three
days later, the repair work had not even been started. Apparently, his new
employee had been too busy setting up his new shop. Tom was furious!
Tom’s
normal reaction would have been to turn tyrannical and perhaps even fire the
man … and all the effort he put in to hiring this worker would be lost. Tom
knew that if he gave in to his Fight Reaction, his employee might simply quit
and return to self-employment. Tom had to find another way to approach the
problem.
Tom
shifted to Empathy. He had already told his employee WHAT he needed; now he had
to tell him WHY. Tom decided to take some time to sit down with his new
employee and get to know him better.
At first,
they spent time discussing the arrangements of their new “partnership.” Tom
asked his employee how he felt about his new workshop, taking the time to
really listen to his excitement and concerns. Eventually Tom asked, “If you were me, and had to go tell a friend
that his car would not be ready for
his anniversary, after you had promised him it would be ready, how would it
make you feel?”
Tom could
see his new employee’s eyes light up in understanding. He nodded, wished the
man a pleasant afternoon, and then left him alone.
Without
ultimatums or threats, the body shop man immediately got to work fixing the
car. Not only that, he went above and beyond the call of duty by pulling
several late-night shifts to make sure the work was done perfectly, and on
time.
By
painting an emotional picture that was easy to understand, Tom was able to
relate his needs to his employee. The car was finished with time to spare, and
the relationship, so close to a bad start, was firmly established with mutual
respect.
174
The Tool:
The Trust Formula
At the core of your creation or enhancement
of your effectiveness as a love-based leader is the ability to inspire trust,
and thus gain support from others. In relationships, people who trust you will
listen to you, open up to you, date you, befriend you, endorse you, and will
generally want to spend time with you. In business, they will buy from you,
hire you, promote you, recommend you, work hard for you, and will want you on
their team. In politics, people who trust you will volunteer time, give you
their vote, spread your message, and make campaign contributions.
There is
a formula that can make gaining trust much easier. Consistent use of this
formula has enabled many of my students to reach previously unreachable people.
Of course, nothing guarantees how others will respond, but the “Trust Formula”
will definitely increase your odds of a positive response.
When you
demonstrate a fear-based reaction to others, you actually give them an excuse
to react to you. Eventually, they will grow to expect your negative behavior
and pre-act to you. The love-based leader strives to remove these excuses by
refusing to react in the first place.
There is
an effective technique that empowers you to stay in control. I call this tool
the “Trust Formula.” When you are about to react or pre-act with any negative
behavior, simply stop and think the following sentence:
The Trust
Formula
“I love
you and I accept you,
even
though I don’t understand you.”
Here is
how it works. When you are feeling angry and judgmental, and are about to react
to someone, stop and just think the formula’s exact words. This pause will give
you a chance to re-establish self-control, and choose an empathetic alternative
to a fear-based reaction of Fight, Flight, Freeze, or Facade.
Unfortunately,
the loss of self-control is all too common. If you are like me, you may have
even reacted negatively when you first read this formula (see how easy it is to
get you to react?). I actually laughed when I first heard it. I thought, “If you do this formula when people are
treating you wrong, they will eat you alive. You have opened the door to
continued abuse.”
Typically,
most people resist using the Trust Formula even in a Level-1 Negative
Circumstance (i.e. spilt milk). It can be even more difficult to use this
formula following a Level-2 Negative Circumstance such as a firing, a car
accident, or a crime. However, the Trust Formula is hardest to use when there
has been a Level-3 Negative Circumstance … a death caused by alcohol, drugs,
physical abuse, medical malpractice, murder, war, or terrorism.
Nevertheless,
The Trust Formula will help you to create the trust that will be necessary to
solve most problems, and give you a side benefit of reduced stress.
175
You do not have to believe it.
You do not have to like it. You do not even have to feel it. You just need to
use it. Just try it. What do you have to lose?
With the
exception of love-based leaders such as Jesus Christ, Mahatma Gandhi, Mother
Teresa, and Martin Luther King, Jr., very few people have ever lived their
lives demonstrating something like the Trust Formula. When something goes
wrong, most of us seem to employ the following ‘Distrust Formula’:
The
Distrust Formula
I don’t
understand you.
Therefore, I don’t accept you
and I don’t love you.
How much
of that kind of attitude do you see on a daily basis over Level-1 Negative
Circumstances at home, on the highway, at work, in restaurants, in stores, and
even in places of worship? The question is not, “Does the Trust Formula work?”
The question should be, “What is the
Distrust Formula doing to our children, our families, our business
relationships, our communities, our country, and our world?”
Fear-based
reactors justify negative behaviors when they are afraid. Whether by Fight,
Flight, Freeze, or Facade they strive to control others. Their attitude to
others is, “You are the problem. If you
would just change what you are doing, then
there would be no problem.” In essence, they seek to create peace by trying to make others responsible for solving
problems.
Conversely,
love-based leaders, by using the Trust Formula, choose to maintain self-control
when afraid. Their attitude to others is, “I
don’t understand you, but I do
understand that if you were not threatened, you would not be reacting. It is in
my own best interest to change whatever it is I am doing (or am perceived as
doing), and thus remove the threat.” They seek to create peace by being responsible for solving problems
themselves.
Notice
that both groups are interested in the same result. However, by trying to
control others, fear-based reactors are losing effectiveness.
The goal
is to become so good at it that you can implement the Trust Formula the instant
you sense that you are about to have a fear-based reaction. But, you will often
see results when you suddenly realize that you are in the middle of a
fear-based reaction, and shift to the Trust Formula instead of continuing to
react. People seem to notice, and respond to, your change of attitude.
The Trust Formula is not just a philosophy.
It works. But it will only work if you use it.
176
Using the
Trust Formula
The Trust Formula is designed to
help you to gain self-control, and definitely not as a tool to control other
people. Self-control demonstrates to others that you can be trusted. Most
people have to practice this many times before they see results. Nevertheless,
they always see results, usually more quickly and profoundly than they expect
... whether they demonstrate the Trust Formula before, or during, a fear-based
reaction.
So, when
you have been taken advantage of in business, before you demonstrate a
fear-based reaction, just stop and think, “I
love you and I accept you, even
though I don’t understand you.”
If your
spouse pushes your buttons, and you are about to attack, bite your lip and say
to yourself, “I love you and I accept
you, even though I don’t understand you.”
When your
son, daughter, or parents frustrate you with an obvious lie, before you explode
just think, “I love you and I accept you,
even though I don’t understand you.”
When you
encounter challenging or negative clients, co-workers, employees, or employers
in the workplace, just say to them in your mind, “I love you and I accept you,
even though I don’t understand you.”
Whenever
something especially negative occurs and you are strongly tempted to employ a
FIGHT fear-based reaction, use the “Special” Trust Formula:
The
Special Trust Formula
I love
you and I accept you,
ESPECIALLY
when I don’t understand you.
Whether
you begin practicing The Trust Formula or The Special Trust Formula, if you
want results then begin now, and stay with it. By practicing it on Level-1
Negative Circumstances, and by practicing it on Level-2 Negative Circumstances,
you will develop the expertise to handle Level-3 Negative Circumstances. Sooner
than you imagine, you will see results.
IMPORTANT:
Do not speak The Trust Formula out loud.
It can have strange effect on a someone such as a spouse or a boss when, in the
middle of an argument, you say to them, “I
love you and I accept you, even though I don’t understand you.” It can come across as self-righteous and
patronizing, and can make things
worse. Nevertheless, as you are about to read, there are exceptions to this
rule.
177
The Crisis Negotiator
Dear Ross,
Last night at 9:15 pm, I was dispatched to the 911
Center. The Crisis Negotiation Team, of which I am a member and negotiator, had
been paged out to deal with a man in the county who had shot at officers.
He had barricaded himself in his house, and would
not come out.
He was, however, willing to speak on the phone.
At 9:45 pm, the primary
negotiator began talking with the man in crisis, with me listening in on
another headset. My assignment for the incident, as the second chair
negotiator, was to listen to the dialog and feed ideas to the primary
negotiator.
After letting him vent for
several minutes, I recognized that the man in crisis was a sad 52 year-old man
who was just tired of the world and who DID NOT like authority figures,
especially police. He had a treatable medical condition, but insurance issues
had prevented him from getting the medical attention he needed.
It turned out he did not like
women because of how he had been treated by them in the past. The primary
negotiator, a female, did an outstanding job at putting him at ease. We went
back and forth for approximately one hour trying to build a rapport with him,
to get him to come out of the house peacefully.
Then we hit a wall. He just
wanted to be left alone, and was not going to be coming out. But, after
shooting at police officers with a shotgun, we could not just leave. He was
getting irritated that we would not just go away.
We could not leave until he came
out. We knew that he had weapons in the house, and we did not want to risk
sending SWAT in after him. If he were to have a shotgun trained on his front
door, one of our friends could be shot in the process. Talking him out was our
only option.
At that point, I had a WOW moment.
I thought back to my BreakThrough class with you, and imagined him as if he
were one of our classmates sharing about his life. I thought about some of the
things you taught us, and how I could apply those things to create a win-win
situation. At that moment, it hit me.
I wrote a quick variation of “I love you and I accept you, even though I don’t understand you,” and
handed it to the primary. The primary
shrugged and read word for word: “I
appreciate the situation you are in.
I accept you for who you are, even though I do not understand why you have
taken these measures. Can you please help me to understand what it is in your
past that is really preventing you from coming out of the house to talk to us
in person?”
178
The man
said, “OK, I’ll tell you,” and he
did. He talked for about 10 minutes on how he had issues with police. He was
afraid of coming out because he thought he would get beat up.
The next thing I wrote on the pad
was, “I appreciate you for sharing that with me. I promise you that if
you come out and talk to us, you will not get hurt.” Again, she read it
word for word. He went silent for
several minutes, but we could tell that the line was still open.
Then, out of the blue, he talked
about how he used to be a bull rider. The primary asked him if he was a good
bull rider. He said he was pretty good, and had won a few competitions when he
was younger.
I grabbed the pad and wrote, WIN - WIN. The primary looked at me and smiled. SHE GOT IT. Her
next question was, “So, how did it feel
when you won?” He replied positively
and talked for another couple of minutes
on how it felt.
I then
smiled from ear-to-ear and whispered to the primary, “Did you feel in control
riding the bull when you won?” When the primary asked him that question, he
stated that he did.
Now it was like she was reading
my mind. She smiled at me and told him that he seems like a man who wants to be
in control. He agreed. She then told him that it appears that several things
that have taken place in his life have caused him to feel like he is not in
control. Again he agreed.
She continued, “You
can take control now by coming out and talking
to us, or lose control if we have to come in after you. Why don’t you be the
winner you were as a bull rider. Apply those good times and feelings, and take
control by coming out to talk to us, and we all win!”
The phone went silent. The
primary kept asking him if he was there, and if he was alright. About 5 minutes
went by with no contact. We were getting worried.
Then we got a call from the Negotiations Commander
at the scene that he had just walked out of the house and surrendered
peacefully. I about passed out, laughed, smiled, jumped up and down and cried.
Yes, I went through every
possible emotion in about 5 seconds. WOW. What you taught me worked in my
professional life as well as it has worked in my personal life. What an
incredible tool.
So, you can take pride that YOU
had a part in saving a man’s life last night. I truly feel that the turning
point in the negotiation was when my thoughts turned to you for help in getting
through this.
Had I not, the outcome could have
been very different and possibly even fatal. You provided me with the tools to
create the ultimate win-win situation … the saving of a man’s life.
Thank you.
Love, Mike
(Last
name and city withheld by request)
179
Using the
Trust Formula on Yourself
It is one thing to trust others.
It is another thing altogether to trust yourself. Have you ever felt ashamed about
something you did or did not do? The biggest damages we incur are often
self-inflected, so learning to trust yourself is critical if you want to be a
love-based leader.
When you
demonstrate a fear-based reaction and later feel badly, there is a strong
likelihood of spiraling deeper into the Reactive Cycle (page 63). Beating on
yourself is just as ineffective as beating on someone else.
The
truth? Old habits die hard. Be aware of this fact, and be prepared to use the
Trust Formula on yourself. Here is how it works.
Whenever
you react to someone and then start to regret your actions, instead of
thinking, “I should have”, or “I shouldn’t have” simply say the Trust
Formula to yourself.
I love myself and I accept myself,
even though I don’t understand myself.
Of all
the things I teach, this one simple tool seems to create more positive results
than you can imagine. We go through life trying to figure everyone else out.
Yet how many of us truly understand ourselves?
Unfortunately,
from time to time, all of us react in ways that we are ashamed of. When this
occurs, the tendency is to “beat yourself up” or “put yourself down”. The
result of such actions is to damage your own self-worth.
Conversely,
each time you turn the Trust Formula inward, you actually take a step towards a
stronger self-worth. And if there is one thing you will need to create personal
and professional results in your life, it is self-worth.
With a
positive and healthy self-worth, you will become your own best friend, and will
be able to bounce back from anything. Without a positive and healthy
self-worth, you will become your own worst enemy, and just about anything will
cause you to crush yourself.
Begin by practicing the Trust Formula on yourself.
Practice on little things.
Practice on big things. You will not find a better tool to build your
strength.
180
EXERCISE
#9 - Creating Trust
In a normal day, you probably will not have any
Level-3 Negative Circumstances (death) or Level-2 Negative Circumstances
(destruction). You will, however, have many Level-1 Negative Circumstances
(inconveniences). Face it, if you cannot control yourself when something small
goes wrong, it is unlikely you will spontaneously develop into a love-based
leader when big things go wrong. Practice on small stuff.
1)
Over the
next 24 hours, every time something goes wrong and you are about to demonstrate
a fear-based reaction, practice using the Trust Formula first, and see what
happens. Keep track of each encounter. If someone cuts you off on the freeway,
steals your briefcase, serves you the wrong food, spills milk, gossips,
criticizes you, laughs at you, or is just plain mean, just pause and use the
Trust Formula BEFORE you react. Afterward, go ahead and react if you are still
so inclined. Just get used to pausing before you do so. Do this at least 5
times. Journal your insights:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
2)
Over the
next 24 hours, every time something goes wrong, and you automatically
demonstrate a fear-based reaction, practice using the Trust Formula on yourself afterwards and see what
happens (whether you regret the reaction or not). Just as in the first exercise
on this page, keep track of each encounter. Look for patterns. Do this at least
5 times. Journal your insights:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
181
“For to win one hundred victories in one hundred
battles, is not the acme of skill.
To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of
skill.”
Sun Tzu
(The Art of War)
182
EMPATHY
Compassion
for others is a strength. Use it.
BOTTOM
LINE
Use the Trust
Formula BEFORE or DURING
each of your Fear-Based Reactions.
“I love you and I accept you,
even though I don’t understand you.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Use the Trust
Formula on yourself AFTER
each of your Fear-Based Reactions.
“I love myself and I accept myself,
even though I don’t understand myself.”
“We have been created to love and be loved.”
Mother Teresa
“The greatest thing you’ll ever learn is just to
love
and be loved in return.”
Toulouse Lautrec (from the movie, Moulin Rouge)
“Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is
the goal of all evolution.” Thomas
Edison
“Father forgive them, for they know not what they
do.” Jesus, Luke 23:24, The Holy Bible
183
184
CHAPTER
10
The Four
Personality Styles
Throughout history, there have been countless behavioral theories. They
have come from religious, astrological, philosophical, psychological,
psychiatric, and educational arenas. From Aristotle to Dr. Phil McGraw, there
have been many who have spent their lifetimes on quests for explanations of
human behavior.
One of the oldest theories, as I
call it, is the “Four Personality Styles” behavioral theory. It first appeared
as the Astrological Elements (Fire - Air - Earth
-
Water).
Next came Exekiel’s model (Bold - Far-seeing - Sturdy - Human) and then
Empedocles (Hot - Dry - Cold - Wet).
In about 400 BC, Hippocrates
created the most famous of these ancient models of human behavior, “The Four
Temperaments” (Choleric - Sanguine - Phlegmatic - Melancholic). With it, he
determined that human health and behaviors were influenced by the physical
symptoms of blood, phlegm, and bile.
Variations came from Plato
(Artistic - Intuitive - Reasoning - Sensible), Aristotle (Artistic - Intuitive
- Logical - Care-Taking), Galen (Quick Tempered - Buoyant - Sluggish -
Dejected), and Paracelsus (Passionate - Impulsive - Industrious - Calm). From
that time until now, psychiatrists, psychologists, authors, teachers,
behavioral experts, philosophers, business consultants, and others have
implemented variations of this theory with millions of people.
The major breakthrough for the Four Personality
Styles
came in 1921, when Dr. Carl Jung divided people
into his
“Four Archetypes”
Sensor - Intuitor - Thinker - Feeler
185
Building
on Dr. Jung’s work, dozens of contemporary models have separated people into
these same four groupings. Examples include Myers-Briggs’ Type Indicator,
Personna Matrix System, D.I.S.C., Ned Hermann’s Brain Dominance Instrument,
Wilson Learning, and the Japanese Blood-Type Personality System. The “Appendix”
(Page 206) has an extensive list of 194 variations of the “Four Personality
Styles” behavioral theory.
Each
variation of Four Personality Style theory generally advances only one of two
potential benefits. Some promote an increased personal effectiveness by
learning and improving one’s own style, while others teach how to recognize and
work with the styles of others.
Of all of
these systems, only Galen’s “Four Humors” truly departed from the practice of
trying to define all people by four specific personalities. His was a system to
cure disease, based on a therapy of opposites (sound familiar?).
However
effective, none of these systems (excepting Galen’s) have addressed the two
inherent problems with all variations of the Four Personality Styles Behavioral
Theory … until now.
The
Problem With Learning Your Own Style
The stated benefit of learning
your personality style is; you are able to build on your strengths, while at
the same time increasing your ability to predict your own negative behaviors.
With this information, you will be able to make more effective choices.
While
true, there can be a negative side effect to these systems. Instead of
changing, people have been known to use this information to justify their own
negative and non-productive behaviors. I have heard comments such as, “It’s my personality style to be direct. It’s your problem if you can’t handle
it.”
The
Turtle and the Scorpion
Once upon a time a scorpion asked
a turtle to give him a ride across a stream. The turtle refused saying, “I’ll get you to the middle of the stream
and you will sting me and I’ll die.”
The
scorpion replied, “First, you have to
realize there is no way I’d sting you. If
I killed you, then I would surely drown. Second, it is quite possible that
someday you might need a powerful friend, and I would owe you one.”
This made
sense to the turtle. Since he always believed it was better to make a friend
than an enemy, he decided to give the scorpion a ride.
The scorpion
climbed on the back of the turtle’s shell and they entered the water.
Everything went fine until the turtle felt a pain on his neck. Sure enough, the
scorpion had stung him.
As the
turtle became paralyzed and started to drown, he managed to ask the now
drowning scorpion why he had stung him. The scorpion replied, “I couldn’t help myself. It’s my nature.”
186
The
Problem With Categorizing the Styles of Others
Individuals and organizations
have proved the benefits from these systems the world over for decades. Those
armed with the knowledge of the four styles have found they could “usually”
communicate more effectively with others.
Salespeople,
in particular, have enjoyed the benefits of easier sales by targeting their
sales approach to the specific styles of their clients and prospects. Another
effective usage has been to fit prospective employees to specific jobs, by
matching them with the appropriate style. For example: an “Analyzing”
accountant, a “Promoting” sales manager, a “Supporting” assistant, or a “Controlling”
plant manager (the style names are from the Integro-Persona Matrix system).
The
problem?
Nobody
acts the same way all of the time.
In the
short term, there are definite advantages to both the organization and to the
new employee. Unfortunately, when someone is reacting “out” of their normal
style, and you are pre-disposed to treat them in one way, you will treat them
exactly wrong … on purpose.
Additionally,
when circumstances change and you do not allow for the other person to be
flexible enough to “grow” it can cause problems. One such example appears when
there is an opportunity for advancement. People are often overlooked for
promotion to a position for which they are qualified, because they are not
viewed as possessing the “appropriate” characteristics.
As a
result of such stereotyping people get cubby-holed. Management then spends
time, money and effort to hire and train someone from the outside. This costs
the organization even more when it loses a valuable, but frustrated, employee.
The
Unique Advantage of “Four E’s of Excellence”
By studying several different
systems, including my own People Wheel, and the interactions of the
participants, I have become aware of the advantages and disadvantages of all
adaptations of the “Four Personality Styles” Behavioral Theory. More
importantly, as previously stated, I have observed an important problem
inherent to them all (except for Galen): All people behave according to their
primary style most of the time. Nevertheless, nobody acts the same way all of
the time, especially when they feel threatened.
The Four
E’s of Excellence system is based upon your being aware of your own current
reactions, and not on your normal behavior or personality style. Love-based
leadership results from changing your behaviors when stressed,
187
instead of trying to control,
manipulate, ignore, or pacify people with the intent to get them to change.
Interestingly,
each fear-based reaction is just one of the Four E’s of Excellence, but without
its balancing opposite. Once you understand this, the solution becomes simple.
When experiencing a fear-based reaction, do not deny it or let it overwhelm
you, simply ADD its balancing opposite. Then, you remain in control of
yourself.
BALANCING
OPPOSITES
The FIGHT
reaction is Ethics without Empathy,
so calm down and ADD EMPATHY
The FLIGHT
reaction is Enthusiasm without
Evaluation,
so slow down and ADD EVALUATION
The FREEZE
reaction is Evaluation without
Enthusiasm,
so lighten up and ADD ENTHUSIASM
The FACADE
reaction is Empathy without Ethics,
so get real and ADD ETHICS
Therefore,
when experiencing a fear-based reaction (Fight, Flight, Freeze, or Facade), you
have a choice. Stop, breathe, and make the conscious choice to add the
appropriate balancing opposite (Empathy, Evaluation, Enthusiasm, or Ethics), as
each case requires, or continue with a behavior that you know would not work if
someone were doing it to you.
If you
choose to overcome your fear-based reactions in such a manner, your resulting
love-based leadership will lead you to create personal and professional
excellence. Regardless of your issues and circumstances, in times of stress or
challenge, you always have a choice: Living fear-based or leading love-based.
Choose wisely.
188
The
Love-Based Leader TARGET ZONE
If you are not moving towards the
center from love, then you are automatically moving to the extremes from fear.
To overcome your negative fear-based reaction, and thus prevent the extreme
fear-based reactions, strive to create the positive characteristic from the
opposite inner quadrant.
Paranoid |
Histrionic |
FIGHT FLIGHT
Ethics Enthusiasm
Evaluation Empathy
FREEZE |
FACADE |
Avoidant |
Dependent |
Balance is the Key
189
Stay in
the Target Zone
(The Inner Circle)
190
Summary – Using “Four E’s of Excellence” on
Yourself
When You ... |
FIGHT |
FLIGHT |
FREEZE |
FACADE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Are |
|
|
Tasks
& |
Emotions
& |
|
CONSUMED |
Results |
Relationships |
|||
Commitments |
Feelings |
||||
with: |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
You
Tend to Ask: |
What? |
Who? or When? |
How? |
Why? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggressive |
Distracted |
Anxious |
Defensive |
|
|
Arrogant |
||||
You
Appear to |
Harried |
Inward |
Insecure |
||
Critical |
|||||
Hurried |
Isolated |
Intimidated |
|||
Others
to Be: |
Demanding |
||||
Hyperactive |
Serious |
Phony |
|||
|
Sarcastic |
||||
|
Scattered |
Withdrawn |
Subordinate |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your
Fear |
Judgmental |
Frantic |
Overwhelmed |
Worried |
|
MANIFESTS
as: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Are |
|
|
|
|
|
AT RISK |
PARANOID |
HISTRIONIC |
AVOIDANT |
DEPENDENT |
|
of
Becoming: |
|
|
|
|
|
You Solution |
EMPATHY |
EVALUATION |
ENTHUSIASM |
ETHICS |
|
is to ADD: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
Need to |
Emotions
& |
Tasks
& |
Time
For |
Results |
|
FOCUS
on:: |
Feelings |
Commitments |
Relationships |
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
Need to Ask: |
WHY? |
HOW? |
WHO or
WHEN? |
WHAT? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accepting |
Deliberate |
Creative |
Accountable |
|
|
Compassionate |
||||
You
Need to |
Diligent |
Expressive |
Congruent |
||
Kind |
|||||
Integral |
Open |
Decisive |
|||
BECOME: |
Nurturing |
||||
Patient |
Positive |
Honest |
|||
|
Responsive |
||||
|
Reliable |
Promoting |
Thorough |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use This |
The
Trust |
|
Planned |
Creating |
|
Love-Based |
Centering |
Desired |
|||
Formula |
Spontaneity |
||||
TOOL: |
|
Results |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Your KEY |
FORGIVE |
SLOW |
PLAY |
RISK |
|
is To: |
DOWN |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
Need to |
Courtesy |
Details |
Attention |
Assurances |
|
GIVE
Others: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Need To |
Give To You |
Speak |
“In” |
Know The |
|
LET OTHERS: |
Truth |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
191
EXERCISE #10 - Your Love-Based
Leadership Qualities
Review the following four lists
of attitudes, qualities, attributes, and behaviors. Circle each one that you
feel you possess. Star (*) those that you have been able to demonstrate even
when stressed. The challenge here is to be honest with yourself.
Characteristics of Love-Based Leadership
List A |
List B |
List C |
List D |
|
|
|
|
Accountable |
Creative |
Deliberate |
Accepting |
|
|
|
|
Bold |
Energetic |
Detailed |
Accommodating |
|
|
|
|
Confident |
Enthusiastic |
Diligent |
Compassionate |
|
|
|
|
Congruent |
Exciting |
Evaluative |
Cooperative |
|
|
|
|
Decisive |
Expressive |
Industrious |
Courteous |
|
|
|
|
Determined |
Open |
Integral |
Empathetic |
|
|
|
|
Ethical |
Persuasive |
Methodical |
Friendly |
|
|
|
|
Efficient |
Positive |
Patient |
Kind |
|
|
|
|
Focused |
Promoting |
Persistent |
Nurturing |
|
|
|
|
Honest |
Spontaneous |
Precise |
Responsive |
|
|
|
|
Thorough |
Stimulating |
Reliable |
Supportive |
|
|
|
|
Total the
number of circled and starred items in each column:
____+____=____ |
____+____=____ |
____+____=____ |
____+____=____ |
|||
O |
* |
O |
* |
O* |
O |
* |
|
Ethics |
Enthusiasm |
Evaluation |
|
Empathy |
|
192
EXERCISE #10 - Continued
Your Love-Based Leadership Qualities
The List With Your Highest Number: ____________
This is your PRIMARY Love-Based Leadership
quality:
The List
With Your Next Highest Number: ____________
This is
your SECONDARY Love-Based Leadership quality:
The List
With Your Next Highest Number:
____________
This is
your UNCOMMON Love-Based Leadership quality:
The List With Your Lowest Number: ____________
This is your RAREST Love-Based Leadership
quality:
Hints:
If you always say what you mean and it’s, “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead”* when faced with difficulties or
challenges, your primary quality is probably
ETHICS. Your least demonstrated is most likely EMPATHY … and you are certain of
this.
If you feel that you demonstrate all four qualities
equally, your primary quality is probably ENTHUSIASM. Your least demonstrated
is most likely EVALUATION. You will resist this, but you need to look deeper.
If you analyze this for more than a minute, and/or
do not feel you are very strong with any of them, your primary quality is
probably EVALUATION, and your least demonstrated is most likely ENTHUSIASM.
If you worry about what others might think of your
choices, your primary quality is probably EMPATHY, and your least demonstrated
is most likely ETHICS (which you almost certainly will deny, but you probably
will admit to telling white-lies).
* - Admiral Farragut, 1864
193
But What
if “Four E’s of Excellence” Does Not Work?
After you have examined and changed your behavior,
if the person you are trying to reach is still not responding, only then does
it make sense to evaluate their behavior. While most “Four Personality Style”
systems are helpful for this, their effectiveness is greatly diminished when
the self-evaluation step is glossed-over or skipped.
The best way to accomplish this
is to remember the old axiom, “When in
Rome, do as the Romans do.” In other
words, learn to speak the language of those
who are reacting. In the case of Four E’s of Excellence, that means:
If The Person You Are Trying To Reach |
Your Solution is to |
|
||
|
is Reacting From: |
|
Lead
With Love From: |
|
|
FIGHT |
ETHICS |
|
|
|
FLIGHT |
ENTHUSIASM |
|
|
|
FREEZE |
EVALUATION |
|
|
|
FACADE |
EMPATHY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the following page, there are
more specific suggestions. This is obviously only the tip of the iceberg.
Nevertheless, with practice you will find it quite effective in assisting you
in your quest to create desired results with love-based leadership, but only after
looking at and changing yourself.
IMPORTANT:
Do NOT
Try to Change Someone Else.
Change
Yourself.
194
Summary – Using “Four E’s of Excellence” on OTHERS
When
They ... |
FIGHT |
FLIGHT |
FREEZE |
FAÇADE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They Seem |
|
|
Tasks
& |
Emotions
& |
|
CONSUMED |
Results |
Relationships |
|||
Commitments |
Feelings |
||||
with: |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
They
Tend to |
What? |
Who? or When? |
How? |
Why? |
|
ASK: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggressive |
Distracted |
Anxious |
Defensive |
|
|
Arrogant |
||||
They
Appear to |
Harried |
Inward |
Insecure |
||
Critical |
|||||
Hurried |
Isolated |
Intimidated |
|||
You to
Be: |
Demanding |
||||
Hyperactive |
Serious |
Phony |
|||
|
Sarcastic |
||||
|
Scattered |
Withdrawn |
Subordinate |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Their
Fear |
Judgmental |
Frantic |
Overwhelmed |
Worried |
|
MANIFESTS
as:: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
They Are |
|
|
|
|
|
AT RISK |
PARANOID |
HISTRIONIC |
AVOIDANT |
DEPENDENT |
|
of
Becoming: |
|
|
|
|
|
YOUR
Solution |
|
|
|
|
|
is For
YOU to |
ETHICS |
ENTHUSIASM |
EVALUATION |
EMPATHY |
|
ADD: |
|
|
|
|
|
You Need to |
Results |
Time For |
Tasks & |
Emotions & |
|
FOCUS
on: |
Relationships |
Commitments |
Feelings |
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
Need to |
WHAT? |
WHO or
WHEN? |
HOW? |
WHY? |
|
ASK: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accountable |
Creative |
Deliberate |
Accepting |
|
|
Congruent |
||||
YOU
Need |
Expressive |
Diligent |
Compassionate |
||
Decisive |
|||||
Open |
Integral |
Kind |
|||
to
BECOME: |
Honest |
||||
Positive |
Patient |
Nurturing |
|||
|
Thorough |
||||
|
Promoting |
Reliable |
Responsive |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use This |
Creating |
Planned |
Centering |
The
Trust |
|
Love-Based |
Desired |
||||
Spontaneity |
Formula |
||||
TOOL: |
Results |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
You KEY is to: |
RISK |
PLAY |
SLOW |
FORGIVE |
|
DOWN |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
You Need to |
Assurances |
Attention |
Details |
Courtesy |
|
GIVE
Them: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
You Need To |
Know The |
“In” |
SPEAK |
Give To
You |
|
LET
THEM: |
Truth |
||||
|
|
|
195
The
Global Love-Based Leader
Over the last 30 years, there has
been a global shift in leadership effectiveness. Managers, executives, parents,
spouses, teachers, community leaders, elected officials, and other
position-power fear-based reactors are increasingly frustrated because the old “solutions”
are simply not working anymore.
Sometimes
the problems are so overwhelming it can be easy to demonstrate one or more of
the four fear-based reactions. However, whether it is Fight, Flight, Freeze, or
Facade, the one certainty is that when you are reacting, you become part of the
problem ... because it gives others an excuse to react to you.
There are
times when something so devastating occurs, you cry out for someone to take
action. However, when you feel a fire in your belly about the “wrongness” of an
incident, and all you do is react, you have bastardized your own integrity. At
that moment you have the chance to become part of the solution, but only if you
choose to lead with love.
“We are not going to be able to operate our
Spaceship Earth successfully, nor for much longer, unless we see it as a whole
spaceship and our fate as common.
It has to
be everybody or nobody.”
Buckminster Fuller
Worldwide,
we are desperately in need of leaders: Not position-power fear-based reactors,
but global love-based leaders. Fear makes a poor foundation for the choice of “right”
and “wrong”. The only chance for peace to prevail is through the practice of
the love-based qualities of Ethics, Enthusiasm, Evaluation, and Empathy.
To many,
the concept of love-based leadership sounds like pleasant philosophy. The
perception is that anyone who strives to live up to this ideal will be
walked-on in relationships, taken advantage of in business, and ridiculed or
resisted (or worse) on the global stage.
Global
love-based leaders such as Jesus Christ, Mother Teresa, Abraham Lincoln, St.
Francis of Assisi, Buckminster Fuller, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Dr. Albert
Schweitzer, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and others have demonstrated the
powerful alternative of love-based leadership. We have studied, honored, praised,
and even worshiped the few who have lived this truth, but rarely have we made
honest efforts to emulate them.
196
There are
two reasons for this. First, the very effectiveness of such distinguished lives
seems to elevate each of these “saints” to a higher stature above us “normal”
people. Indeed, it almost feels arrogant to imagine being able to accomplish
results in such a love-based manner.
Second,
these people have always paid a penalty for their successes. They have often
toiled alone against seemingly impossible odds. They have been criticized and
ridiculed. Many have been imprisoned or attacked, and some have even been
killed. These prices, or even the possibility of them, are too high for most
people to consider.
Position-power
fear-based reactors generally view love-based solutions as naive, ineffective,
foolhardy, and even dangerous. As a result, fear-based reactions abound. “I don’t get mad I get even.”; “I don’t
have to take this, I’m out of here.”;
“If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.”; and “Don’t Rock the Boat,” have become
their mantras.
Yes,
there is a risk in choosing love-based leadership. However, there is a greater
risk for failing to do so. The time has come to take the “saints” off their
pedestals. It is an insult to honor these people, while refusing to walk in
their footsteps.
We can no
longer afford the luxury of leaving
Love-Based Leadership in the hands of the very few.
Most
people have learned how to fight against something, but few have learned how to
fight for something … especially when threatened. Some people are gung-ho to
fight terrorists, while others are attacking the people who support war. “Peace-Nicks”
and “War-Mongers”, as they unaffectionately label each other, have one thing in
common ... they are both fear-based in their attacks on each other.
What
effects are fear-based reactions having on Post-9/11 America, and the rest of
the world? Is the movement more towards Oneness or Separation? Acceptance or
Judgment? Love or Hate? Peace or War?
197
The concept of Love-Based Leadership is not new.
You have heard it all many times, and in many ways:
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” “The Golden Rule.” Jesus, The Holy Bible, Matthew 7:12
“Not one of you truly believes until you wish for
others
what you wish for yourself.”
Islam –
The Prophet Muhammad, Hadith
“When you hurt someone else, you hurt yourself even
more.” Your Grandmother
“What is hateful to you, do not do to your
neighbor.”
Judaism – Hillel, Talmud, Shabbat 31a
“Treat not others in ways that you yourself would
find hurtful.” Buddhism – The Buddha,
Udana-Varga 5.18
“For every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction,
and a resultant.”
Sir Isaac Newton
“Do not do to others what would cause pain if done
to you.” Hinduism – Mahabharata 5:1517
“Do not do to others what you do not want done to
yourself.” Confucianism – Confucius,
Analects 15:23
198
“We are but strands in the web of life.
Whatsoever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.”
Chief
Seattle, of the Suquamish and
Duwamish
Native American Tribes
“Lay not
on any soul a load that you would not wish to be
laid upon
you, and desire not for anyone the things
you would not desire for yourself.”
Baha’I Faith – Baha’u’llah, Gleanings
“And in the end, the love you take is equal to the
love you make.” The End, Abbey Road – The Beatles, Lennon &
McCartney
Finally, I contribute:
And in
the end, the hate you take is equal to the hate you make.
If you
think these equations are wrong, then you need to look deeper. Whatever the
questions may be, fear-based reactions triggered by resentment, judgment, prejudice,
and hate, are not the answers.
Yes,
love-based leadership can sound naive. Let’s face it, “All You Need Is Love”
is easy only when everyone else is being loving. Nevertheless, I challenge you
to overcome your fear-based reactions and create personal and professional
greatness as a love-based leader.
Love-based
leaders are needed in families that are being decimated by fear-based
reactions. There is an urgent need for corporate love-based leaders, as the
greed of executives in companies such as Enron, WorldCom, Arthur Anderson,
Countrywide, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, and AIG have produced an
increasingly fear-based economy.
Love-based
leaders are needed in government, as fear-based and bitterly divided
politicians cannot possibly accomplish the business of the people. There is a
desperate need for global love-based leaders, as all acts of terrorism and the
reactions to those acts are fear-based.
When
taken all together, there is an unprecedented need for love-based leaders. It
is important to note that while love-based leaders do not react when
threatened, they are not pacifists. Mother Teresa was a warrior. However, she
fought her battles with love.
199
A Sense
of Urgency
Throughout history there have
been those who became love-based leaders in spite of great obstacles, and who
continued to affect the lives of others long after their deaths. Perhaps you
have known a love-based leader who, while not famous, inspired you in some
manner before he or she passed away ... a friend, relative, teacher, or
business mentor.
All of
these people had something in common with one another, and eventually with you
and me ... life is simply not long enough. There is never enough time.
My son
Shaunessy was born 6 ½ weeks premature. He was so small and fragile we had to
leave him in the hospital for several weeks. When we were finally allowed to
take him home, I remember my mother holding him in her hands (and she has small
hands). She looked up at me with a tear in her eye and said, “This was you, just a heartbeat ago.” Just another heartbeat
later, he is 24 and working in Hollywood and already has his first movie credit
(The Informant).
There are
no guarantees in life. Whether you only survive another five minutes or live a
hundred more years, the only valid question is, “What are you going to do
with the time you have left?”
Fear-Based
Living is becoming a thing of the past.
Position-Power
Fear-Based Leaders are history.
Love-Based Leadership is the way of the Future.
If you
truly wish to make a greater impact with your life than you ever imagined, then
the path of love-based leadership will empower you to manifest your dreams.
Someday, when you have achieved excellence in all areas of your life, it will
not matter to you if anyone else knows. You will know. With this knowledge, you
will be filled with peace when you look back on your life, because you will be
proud of what you did with it.
Time passes so quickly. Cherish each day by living
with a sense of urgency.
Nevertheless, there is another
reason you need a sense of urgency. It is huge.
200
The
Love-Based Leadership Boom
The world changed in 1976. There
is now enough of everything for everyone. Buckminster Fuller calculated that we
are doing so much more with so much less that not only should nobody be
starving, every human on “Spaceship Earth” could be living as
billionaires.
All
children born after 1976 (and perhaps even those born a bit before that) are
unique in history. Whether they consciously realize it or not, they are
experiencing the world from the “enough for everyone” perspective.
Nevertheless,
they have been raised by well-meaning pre-1976 parents, with a “not enough for everyone” consciousness.
These children need love-based leaders
to be their mentors. This is critical, because the children that they will
raise will be the most powerful generation of love-based leaders the world has
ever seen.
It will
be their children who will represent another baby boom. Not the population boom
of Post World War II, but the ‘Love-Based Leader Baby Boom’ of children born of
post-1976 parents. It will be a global revolution far more profound than the
1960’s.
These
are, and will be, the first people to have been raised by parents who according
to Buckminster Fuller, were born in a world where there is enough of everything
for everyone. They will come to see that the only obstacle for world peace is
the mindset of their well-meaning fear-based elders.
There is
a large and growing population of young people striving to become love-based
leaders. As such, they will not respond to fear-based parenting, fear-based
educating, fear-based advertising, or fear-based political campaigning in the
same ways as their parents and grandparents.
The world
has enough people living fear-based. We need love-based leaders and we need
them now. They are needed to pave the way for the first full generation of
potential love-based leaders who should be making their presence felt about
2020.
The shift
of human consciousness is near. The Love-Based Leader Baby Boom will occur with
you or without you. It will be quicker with you. Now is the time to teach the
concepts of love-based leadership by putting them into action. Do it now.
Regardless of your circumstances, and how you feel about them, you
really do have a choice ...
Live Fear-Based – or – Lead
Love-Based
The Children Are Watching.
201
JAMES ROSWELL QUINN
James Roswell Quinn is an
international keynote speaker, leadership trainer, seminar facilitator,
peer-abuse advocate, and “dream-driven” success coach. Since 1972, “Ross” has
presented over 1,500 keynote addresses, corporate workshops, personal growth
workshops, “Wave” (anti-bullying) seminars, relationship weekends, and
leadership retreats to tens of thousands of people in the USA, UK, Canada,
Panama, Dubai, New Zealand, Thailand, Mexico, Bahamas, and Dominican Republic.
He has coined the phrases, “Love-Based Leader”, “Fear-Based Reactor”, “Impersonal
Power”, “Victimary” (as opposed to Visionary), “Pre-Actions”, and “Get Over
Yourself”.
Quinn’s
corporate seminars and keynote addresses (Speaking Of Success, Get Over
Yourself, The People Wheel, and Four E’s of Excellence) have been presented to
dozens of businesses and organizations worldwide. Participants learn how to
lead and communicate more effectively, in order to create a more positive work
environment, reduce conflict, improve customer service, develop faster
time-to-market, and reduce employee turnover.
Quinn
Client List
Walt Disney Feature Animation
Microtel
... Kodak ... Mitsubishi ... Van de Kamp’s
Nightingale-Conant Corporation
State
Farm Insurance ... Lincoln National Life ... Pacific Mutual Life
Materiel Management Institute of Canada
Cornell
University ... Rochester Institute of Technology ... Tech de Monterrey
Real Property Institute of Canada
Nolan
Real Estate Services ... Video Law ... Institutional Financial Services
ReMax Realty (USA, Canada and New
Zealand)
Auckland
Multiple Listing Bureau ... Toronto Real Estate Board
Six Chicago-Area Banks
NAV
CANADA ... K Walsh Travel (Toronto) ... CANDYM
Seven
Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) companies
... and many others.
202
James
Roswell Quinn is on a quest to provide people with the tools to attain and
maintain excellence in their professional and personal relationships. He
published the first version of this book, Controlling Others For Love And Profit,
in 2004. Ross followed this with his 8-CD Personal Audio Seminar entitled, Get
Over
Yourself, in 2006.
In 2007,
Quinn co-authored the self-help book Speaking Of Success with Ken
Blanchard (The One Minute Manager), Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup For The
Soul), and Stephen R. Covey (The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People).
In
September 2007, Quinn was a featured speaker at the Toronto Expo Centre for the
world’s first convention for the best-selling book and DVD, The Secret.
Although he was not a contributor to the book or the DVD, his presentation, “The
Secret of the Secret”, had the largest audience of the conference.
In 2012,
L. Steven Sieden (author, Buckminster Fuller’s Universe),
asked Quinn to contribute a chapter to his new book on Buckminster Fuller, A
Fuller View. Contributing authors include Werner Erhard, Barbara Marx
Hubbard, John Robbins, Hazel Henderson, Dr Joel Levey, Bill Kauth, and 37
other committed citizens of “Spaceship Earth”.
Ross and
his wife Christine developed their Conscious
Couples weekend to help people create more effective and committed intimate
relationships. Its premise is that troubled couples need joy, not work.
For over
three decades, Quinn has inspired participants from around the world to make
greater contributions WITH their lives. His Leadership Dynamics
Intensive (LDI) utilizes rock climbing, high ropes “confidence” courses, Tai Chi “Quinn”, studies of
Mother Teresa and Buckminster Fuller, as well as indoor and outdoor group
activities. Everything in this unique and powerful course is designed to assist
people in increasing their leadership skills and inter-personal effectiveness.
About
every 4 years, Quinn runs his New
Zealand Adventure and Leadership
Dynamics Intensive (LDI). In this amazing 3-week experience, participants learn about their own
unique leadership style while studying while touring New Zealand. Lets face it,
not many people manage to go bungee jumping, white-water rafting, sailing
overnight through the incredible Milford Sound, night canoeing, exploring
thermal-areas, hiking on glaciers, jet-boating, wine tasting, black-water
rafting (through underground caves), swimming with dolphins, touring Hobbiton
and other Lord of the Rings film sites, and a lot more ... all in just
one trip! WHEW!
Whether
in a book, CD, keynote address, sales workshop, peer-abuse seminar, leadership
training, personal growth seminar, success coaching, or on a New Zealand
adventure ... Quinn’s leading-edge human development technology empowers
love-based leaders to create desired results by overcoming their fear-based
reactions. As a result, many thousands of people worldwide have created greater
successes in their personal and professional lives than they had ever dreamed
possible.
James
Roswell Quinn was born in Seattle, Washington in 1950. He grew up in the Los
Angeles area and graduated from the University of Southern California in 1972,
with a B.S. in Business Administration.
Quinn is
the father of six children. He and Christine make their home in Lake Summerset,
Illinois.
203
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All of the following people have contributed to The
Love-Based Leader. Without their stories, editing, feedback, financial
backing, love, and encouragement this book simply would not exist.
Thank you German Avila, Karen
Barnes, Jennifer Kaia Bartok, Janet Battaglio, Rudy Bazelmans, Regina Blake,
Ross & Annette Bradbury, David Bryan, Darlene Buckingham, Paul Camp, Emily
Cieslinski, Rob Cleverly, Angie Coleman, Jose Colon, Peter Comrie, Nancy &
Jim Cooper, Diane Costello, Jackie Cowan, Linda Cowan, Paul & Nancy Cushman,
Danny Dehm, Aida Dennehy, Fred & Beth Dewey, Lina DiSanto, Wade Domet, Mark
Doyle, Tom & Shirley Dusmet, The Dusmet Family, Josie & Alan Estill,
Karen Evans, JoAnne & Sam Feil, Kate & Michael Ferguson, Cally Field,
Bobby Fielding, Marlene & Charlie Fisher, Dave Gant, Beverly & Bill
Gleason, Danielle Gleason, Adelaide Gomer, David Good, Roger & Jackie
Grey-Moores, Steve Guizzetti, Guy & Nan Hanna-Paquin, Michell Hays, Greg
Heaney, Barbara Hellman, Cindy Hoy, Craig
&
Barbara
Imrie, Anne James, Lee Jeavons, Jillian Jeffery, Phil & Brenda Johnson,
Kathy Jones, George Kaufman, Lila Keller, Shannon Kelly, Faye Kendel, Andre
Kennedy, Kathleen & Jon Kores, Rebecca Kraai, Brenda Lawrie, Irv &
Dorothy Lesch, Sharon Lilla, Syl Leduc, Fernanda Avila & Roberto Martinez,
Amy May, Nancy May, Jan McCormick, Gaël Messoah, Tim & Patty Michels, David
Mock, Rena Gaile & James Morgan, John Nemanic, Matt & Anita Perez,
Jackie Perry, Robert Peshka, Sandra Pierce, Michael Pinkney, Dennis
Ponczkowski, Patricia Price, Josef & Jenny Puehringer, Gary & Cynthia
Quinn, Maureen Rieckhof, Gail Robertson, the Rochester Agape Club, Patrick
Salimi, Jan & Bob Sanders, Richard and Carolyn Santee, Barbara Sarratori,
Joan Simnett, Stephen Smith, Norma & David Spall, Mary & Alan Temple, Toronto
IPI #77, Steve Tucker, Janice Tuschong, Elaine Vanier, Roddy Vanier, Gary Van
Camp, Lew VonAlmen, John Wagner, Kimberly Walsh, George & Susan
Buckley-Watson, Elaine Webster, Dr. Greg Weathers, Chris & Sue Weiss,
Gabrielle Weiss, Paula Wemp, J. R. Wheelwright, Mike & Char Wood, Carol
Yacono, Anita & Steve Yoder, Pastor William Yonker (Immanuel Lutheran
Church), Todd Zdanowski, and one person who prefers to remain anonymous.
To Brandi Jasmine – my editor and
webmaster: All I can say is how much gratitude I have for how good you have
made me look, and for how patient you have been. This book will reach more
people because of you. Many other people assisted with the editing of the
seemingly endless re-writes. But I want to say a special thank you to the
efforts of Nan Hanna-Paquin, Bob Sanders, Steve Tucker, Bobby Fielding, Aida
Dennehy, Cindy Hoy, and Fred Dewey.
To Christine Quinn – my wife and
business partner: Your co-writing was brilliant. You have a special way of
helping me communicate my actual intent, with clarity. No matter how many times
I asked you to read something, you always managed to see my work through the
eyes of new readers and help me find a better way to express my ideas.
204
To Steven
Sieden: I cannot express to you how deeply I appreciate your Foreword to this
book. The first time I read it, I felt as if Buckminster Fuller himself was
introducing me through you. You are a gifted writer and I am humbled to have
your support.
To Peter
Fromme-Douglas: Thank you for the wonderful photograph and many illustrations.
Your abilities as an artist are rare gifts, but I will always remember the
afternoon we came up with the original outrageous title, Controlling Others For Love And
Profit. Oh, how hard we
laughed.
To Janet
Eve Sanders – my mother: I need to say how profoundly you have affected my
life. Your living example taught me of love-based leadership long before I
learned the term. No “thank you” can be enough, but thank you.
To James
Holden Quinn – my father: Your footprints can be found on almost every page of
this book. You were my mentor, my business partner, and my friend – and I miss
you.
Finally,
I thank all of the people whom I have taught, coached, or advised. You have
come from many experiences, backgrounds, cultures, and nationalities. You have
taught me far more than I could possibly have taught you. Because of you, I
have learned that while it is our unique differences that make life
interesting, it is our similarities that bring us together.
The world
has enough people living fear-based. We need more love-based leaders. We need
you, and we need you now.
Thank you,
“Ross”
James Roswell Quinn
“Never doubt that a small group of committed
citizens can change the world.
Indeed,
it is the only thing that ever has.”
Margret
Mead
205
APPENDIX
Variations
of the “Four Personality Styles”
As previously stated in Chapter
10, one of the oldest behavioral theories, as I call it, is the “Four
Personality Styles”. It first appeared as the Astrological Elements (Fire
- Air - Earth - Water).
Later came Hippocrates” Four Temperaments (Choleric - Sanguine - Melancholic -
Phlegmatic)
Then came
Dr. Carl Jung’s Four Archetypes
(Intuitor
- Sensor - Thinker - Feeler)
Which
paved the way for the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator
(Intuition
- Sensates - Thinkers - Feelers)
Following
are 194 models (plus 55 examples from history, TV, books, and movies) that are
in some way reflective of, or based upon, the Four Personality Styles behavioral
theory. Some of these systems focus on self-awareness and self-improvement, but
most are focused on the understanding, categorizing, management, control,
motivation, or improvement of others.
Interestingly,
only Galen’s system of curing disease with his “Therapy of Opposites”
is similar in usage to Four E’s of Excellence, which shows people how
to overcome fear-based reactions with their opposite love-based solutions.
I began
compiling this data in 1975, simply because my first exposure to Four Personality
Styles systems intrigued me. I doubt that you could find a more comprehensive
list.
While
this is an extensive list, there are bound to be errors and omissions and my
interpretations are certainly open to debate. This collection is presented here
to show the widespread application of the Four Personality Styles behavioral
theory, and the similarities between the different variations. Regardless of
the manner in which each system interprets or utilizes the theory, you will
notice how the labels and patterns of the “Four Personality Styles” generally
remain consistent and synonymous.
For ease of comparison, these Four Personality Style
systems
are grouped into the following “Typical Orientations”:
|
Style 1 |
|
|
Style 2 |
|
|
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
206
Historic “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
|
THE FIRE SIGNS |
THE AIR SIGNS |
THE EARTH |
THE WATER |
|||||||||
ASTROLOGY |
SIGNS |
SIGNS |
|||||||||||
|
Aires |
Gemini |
|||||||||||
|
|
Taurus |
Cancer |
||||||||||
|
|
Leo |
|
Libra |
|||||||||
The Four Elements |
|
|
|
Virgo |
Scorpio |
||||||||
Sagittarius |
Aquarius |
|
|||||||||||
|
Capricorn |
|
Pisces |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
CHINESE |
THE FIRST |
THE THIRD |
THE SECOND |
THE FOURTH |
|||||||||
TRINE |
TRINE |
TRINE |
TRINE |
||||||||||
ASTROLOGY |
|||||||||||||
|
Rat |
|
Tiger |
|
Ox |
Rabbit |
|||||||
The Four |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Dragon |
|
Horse |
|
Snake |
|
Sheep |
|||||||
Animal
Trines |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Monkey |
|
Dog |
Rooster |
|
Pig |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Exekiel |
|
Bold |
Far-Seeing |
|
Sturdy |
Humane |
|||||||
(590
BC) |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Empedocles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 BC) |
Hot – Zeus |
Dry – Goea |
Cold – Hera |
Wet – Poseidon |
|||||||||
The
Four Qualities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hippocrates |
Choleric |
Sanguine |
Melancholic |
Phlegmatic |
|||||||||
(370
BC) Four |
|||||||||||||
ANGRY |
CHEERFUL |
|
SAD |
NEUTRAL |
|||||||||
Temperaments |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plato |
Intuitive |
Artistic |
Reasoning |
Sensible |
|||||||||
(350
BC) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aristotle |
Noetic – Intuitive |
Iconic – Artistic |
Dianoetic – |
Pistic – Care |
|||||||||
(325
BC) |
Logical |
|
Taking |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galen
(150 AD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four
Body |
Quick-Tempered |
Buoyant |
Sluggish |
Dejected |
|||||||||
Humors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irenaeus (185 AD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four |
Spiritual |
Spontaneous |
Scholarly |
Historical |
|||||||||
Temperaments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paracelsus |
Nymphs |
Salamanders |
Gnomes |
|
Sylphs |
||||||||
(1550 AD) |
|
||||||||||||
Four
Totem |
PASSIONATE |
IMPULSIVE |
INDUSTRIOUS |
CALM |
|||||||||
Spirits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopi
Medicine |
|
Spirit |
|
Body |
|
Mind |
|
Heart |
|||||
Wheel |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
Early 20th Century “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
|
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Eric Adickes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1907) |
Dogmatic |
Innovative |
Traditional |
Agnostic |
|||||||||
Four World Views |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adler
(1920) |
|
Power |
Revenge |
Service |
Recognition |
||||||||
4 Mistaken Goals |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1920) |
Autocratic |
Motivational |
Custodial |
Collegial |
|||||||||
Levels
of |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernst
Kretschmer |
Insensitive |
|
Manic |
Depressive |
Oversensitive |
||||||||
(1920) |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Carl Jung |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1921)
The Four |
Intuitor |
Sensor |
Thinker |
|
Feeler |
||||||||
Archetypes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Spanger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1928) |
Religious |
Artistic |
Economic |
Theoretic |
|||||||||
Four
Human |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Marston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1928) |
Dominance |
Inducement |
Steadiness |
Compliance |
|||||||||
Emotions
of |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Normal People |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myers-Briggs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1942) MBTI |
Intuition |
Sensates |
Thinkers |
Feelers |
|||||||||
Myers-Briggs |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Type Indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric
Fromm |
Exploitative |
Marketing |
Hoarding |
Receptive |
|||||||||
(1947) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luft & Ingham |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1950) |
|
Blind |
|
Open |
Unknown |
Hidden |
|||||||
The
Johari |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Window |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Eysenck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1955) |
Restless |
Outgoing |
Reliable |
Reserved |
|||||||||
Trait Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myers
(1958) |
Tough-Minded |
Probing |
Scheduling |
Friendly |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
Some Basic “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
John
Geier – |
Dominance |
Influence |
Steadiness |
Compliance |
|||||||||
DiSC |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandler
Sales |
Dominant |
Influencer |
Steady Relater |
Compliant |
|||||||||
Institute |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McQuaig
Institute |
Dominance |
Sociability |
Relaxation |
Compliance |
|||||||||
Selling Styles |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
Dominant |
Extrovert |
|
Patient |
Conformist |
||||||||
Trainers |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.E.S.A. |
Dominant |
Expressive |
Analytical |
|
Solid |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Four S’s |
Self-Propelled |
Spirited |
Systematic |
|
Solid |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fred
Pryor |
Director |
Socializer |
Thinker |
Relater |
|||||||||
CareerTrack |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cathcart & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alessandra |
Director |
Socializer |
Thinker |
Relater |
|||||||||
Relationship |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
Lovas |
Commander |
Expressive |
Thinker |
Nurturer |
|||||||||
About People |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.I.F.O. |
Directing |
|
Doing |
Planning |
Inspiring |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What’s
My Style? |
|
Direct |
Spirited |
Systematic |
Considerate |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
More “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
|
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
McCarter |
|
Driver |
Catalyst |
Visionary |
Amiable |
||||||||
Teamwork Styles |
Traditionalist |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Troubleshooter |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilson |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytic |
Amiable |
||||||||
Learning |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill
& Reid |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
Personal Styles |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Forbes Ley |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
The Best Seller |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John William Wright |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
Styles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don
Hutson |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
Social Styles |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota Multiphasic |
|
Driver |
Expressive |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
Personality
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Four A’s |
Administrative |
|
Active |
Analytical |
Amiable |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.E.A.D. |
|
Leader |
Expressor |
Dependable |
Amiable |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spirit
Totems |
FIRE – |
|
AIR – |
EARTH – |
WATER – |
||||||||
The Magic of |
|||||||||||||
Animal Speak |
The Magic of |
The Magic of |
The Magic of |
||||||||||
Higher Vision & |
|||||||||||||
Ted
Andrews |
Creation |
Manifestation |
Shapeshifting |
||||||||||
Prophecy |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
And More “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
David Keirsey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1984) - Please |
Guardian |
Artisan |
Rationalist |
Idealist |
|||||||||
Understand Me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Berens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperament |
Guardian |
Artisan |
Rational |
Idealist |
|||||||||
Patterns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personality
Zone |
Guardians |
Artisans |
Rationals |
Idealists |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keirsey/Bates |
Epimethean |
Dionysian |
Promethean |
Apollonian |
|||||||||
Four |
|||||||||||||
Dutiful |
|
Artful |
Technological |
Soulful |
|||||||||
Temperaments |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
M. Wolfe |
The Guardian |
The Artisan |
The Analyzer |
The Idealist |
|||||||||
AOL - Find A Job |
(or Duty Seeker) |
(or Action-Seeker) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPersonic |
|
Realist |
|
Doer |
Analytical |
Idealist |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integro Persona |
Controller |
Promoter |
Analyzer |
Supporter |
|||||||||
Matrix System |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S.I. |
Controller |
Promoter |
Analyst |
Supporter |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H Quinn-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.E.P.
People |
Controlling |
Promoting |
Analyzing |
Supporting |
|||||||||
Effective People |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jard DeVille |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice Guys |
Controller |
Entertainer |
Comprehender |
Supporter |
|||||||||
Finish First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart
Atkins |
Controlling- |
Adapting- |
Conserving- |
Supporting- |
|||||||||
Life Orientations |
|
Taking |
Dealing |
Holding |
|
Giving |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toastmaster’s |
The Controller |
The Star |
The Quiet One |
The Talker |
|||||||||
Four Personalities |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
Roles “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Robert Kiyosaki |
|
B – |
|
S – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rich Dad Poor Dad |
|
Small-Business |
|
I – |
|
E – |
|||||||
Big-Business |
|
|
|||||||||||
CASH FLOW |
Person or Self- |
Investor |
Employee |
||||||||||
Owners |
|||||||||||||
Quadrant |
Employed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Career
Possibilities |
Management |
|
Sales |
Accounting |
Human Resources |
||||||||
(High School – |
Law Enforcement |
Entertainment |
Engineering |
Counseling |
|||||||||
Career
Aptitude Test) |
Attorney |
Politics |
Scientist |
Nursing |
|||||||||
Sales
Sense |
Producer |
|
Actor |
Stage Hand |
Director |
||||||||
Kelly
Burnette |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger
Hamilton |
|
Star |
Deal Maker |
Mechanic |
Accumulator |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Moore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archetypes of the |
|
King |
Warrior |
Magician |
|
Lover |
|||||||
Mature Masculine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliff
Barry |
Sovereign |
Warrior |
Magician |
|
Lover |
||||||||
Shadow
Work |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Sheehan |
|
Saint |
Animal |
Craftsman |
|
Friend |
|||||||
The Four Roles |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facebook |
Judging |
Extraverted |
Introverted |
Perceiving |
|||||||||
Personality
Test |
Intuitive |
Feeling |
Thinking |
Sensing |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irwin
Thompson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archetypes in |
|
Leader |
Hunter |
Shaman |
|
Fool |
|||||||
History |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ImaginiVisualDNA |
Conqueror |
Thriller |
Worker Bee |
Escape Artist |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angeles
Arrien |
Visionary |
Warrior |
Teacher |
|
Healer |
||||||||
The Four Fold Way |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shannon
Thunderbird |
Visionary |
Warrior |
Teacher |
|
Healer |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brownsword |
Visionaries |
Catalysts |
Stabilizers |
Negotiators |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McCarter |
Visionary |
Catalyst |
Traditionalist |
Amiable |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
Relationship “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
David
Keirsey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1998)
- Please |
Helpmate |
Playmate |
Mindmate |
Soulmate |
|||||||||
Understand Me II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Harris MD |
I’m OK – |
I’m OK – |
I’m not OK – |
I’m not OK – |
|||||||||
I’m OK |
|||||||||||||
You’re not OK |
You’re OK |
You’re not OK |
You’re OK |
||||||||||
You’re OK |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Robert Needlman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bound
by Birth |
First Born |
Youngest Child |
Only Child |
Middle Child |
|||||||||
Order |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DHarmony
Advice |
First
Born |
Youngest |
Only
Child |
Second
Born |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
C Lundin |
Make Their Day |
|
Play |
Be There |
Choose Your |
||||||||
FISH! |
|
Attitude |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Four |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elements of Trust |
Congruent |
|
Open |
Reliable |
Accepting |
||||||||
A.R.C.O. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synergistics |
Satisfaction |
|
People |
|
Task |
Security |
|||||||
Distinctive |
Orientation |
Orientation |
Orientation |
Orientation |
|||||||||
Circumplex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirschner/Brinkman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Understanding |
Get It Done |
Get Appreciated |
Get It Right |
Get Along |
|||||||||
Communication |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Styles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese Blood- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type Personality |
Type O |
Type AB |
Type A |
Type B |
|||||||||
System |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wriths/Bowman- |
Organizing & |
Acting & |
Understanding & |
Caring & |
|||||||||
Kruhm |
Belonging |
Impacting |
Knowing |
Questioning |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.I.A. |
Impressive
– |
Daring – |
Thoughtful
– |
Curious
– |
|||||||||
Personality Profile |
Mastermind |
Thrill
Seeker |
Observer |
Adventurer |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore
Millon |
Ambivalent |
Independent |
Detached |
Dependent |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Len Sperry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
Self-Confident |
Adventurous |
Leisurely |
Dramatic |
|||||||||
Leadership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quinn
Incorporated |
Congruent |
Persuade |
Deliberate |
Accommodate |
|||||||||
The People Wheel |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213
Management “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
B.E.S.T. |
|
Bold |
Expressive |
Technical |
Sympathetic |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who Moved My |
|
Hem |
|
Scurry |
|
Sniff |
|
Haw |
|||||
Cheese? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type A
or B |
Type A – |
Type A – Messy |
Type B – |
Type B – Casual |
|||||||||
Motivated |
Compulsive |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don Miguel Ruiz |
Be impeccable |
Don’t take |
Don’t make |
Always |
|||||||||
The Four |
|||||||||||||
with your word |
anything seriously |
assumptions |
do your best |
||||||||||
Agreements |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jairek
Robbins |
Results |
|
Action |
|
Beliefs |
Potential |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastman Kodak |
|
NIC |
|
PIC |
|
NUC |
|
PUC |
|||||
Negative- |
Positive- |
Negative- |
|
||||||||||
Positive-Uncertain |
|||||||||||||
Motivational Styles |
Instantaneous |
Instantaneous |
Uncertain |
||||||||||
Consequences |
|||||||||||||
|
Consequences |
Consequences |
Consequences |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Linda
Berens |
In-Charge |
Get-Things-Going |
Chart-the-Course |
Behind-the-Scenes |
|||||||||
Interaction
Styles |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen Fahden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
Dominant |
Creator |
Advancer |
Refiner |
Executor |
|||||||||
Attributes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.I.N.K. |
|
Know |
Network |
|
Learn |
Interact |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard |
Says what is – |
Says what’s |
Says what is – |
Says what’s |
|||||||||
Montgomery |
possible – |
possible – |
|||||||||||
Does what works |
Does what’s right |
||||||||||||
People Patterns |
Does what works |
Does what’s right |
|||||||||||
Cardinal
Stories |
Rational – |
Emotional – |
Rational – |
Emotional – |
|||||||||
Objective |
Objective |
Subjective |
Subjective |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalil (1998) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow Your True |
Courageous |
Conceptual |
Conventional |
Compassionate |
|||||||||
Colors to the Work |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
You Love |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathy
Kolbe |
Follow-Through |
Quick-Start |
Fact-Finder |
Implementor |
|||||||||
The Kolbe Index |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce
Tuckman |
Forming |
Storming |
Preforming |
Norming |
|||||||||
Team Development |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
Organizational “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Dr. Ravi Batra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Great |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depression of |
Acquisitors |
Warriors |
Intellectuals |
Laborers |
|||||||||
1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Types
of Nations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fisher
& Muller |
|
The |
|
The |
|
The |
|
The |
|||||
Four
Dimensional |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Organization |
Community |
Individual |
Life Cycle |
||||||||||
Leadership |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Harvard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultures |
Fortresses |
Baseball
Teams |
Academies |
|
Clubs |
||||||||
Wall Street Journal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/17/89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake-Mouton |
|
Task |
|
Team |
Impoverished |
Country Club |
|||||||
Managerial Grid |
Management |
Management |
Management |
Management |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASA |
|
Direct |
|
Vision |
Access Values |
|
Relate |
||||||
Basic Organization |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Organize |
|
Invent |
|
Value |
Include |
||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ohio
State |
High-Structure |
Low-Structure |
High-Structure |
Low-Structure |
|||||||||
University |
|
Low- |
|
High- |
|
Low- |
|||||||
|
|
|
High-Consideration |
||||||||||
Leadership Model |
Consideration |
Consideration |
Consideration |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political
Compass |
Authoritarian - |
Libertarian - |
Authoritarian - |
Libertarian- |
|||||||||
|
Right |
|
Right |
|
Left |
|
Left |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worlds
Smallest |
|
Statist |
|
Right - |
Left - Liberal |
Libertarian |
|||||||
Political
Quiz |
Big Government |
Conservative |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Potter |
Slytherin |
Gryffindor |
Ravenclaw |
Hufflepuff |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Peace Pole |
East (Japan) |
West (USA) |
North (Germany) |
South (Russia) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan
Knaupp |
Production |
Connection |
Harmony |
Status Quo |
|||||||||
ARRAY |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States of |
Executive |
Legislative Branch |
Judicial Branch |
The Electorate |
|||||||||
America |
Branch |
The Supreme |
|||||||||||
The
Congress |
“We The People” |
||||||||||||
Constitution |
The
President |
|
Court |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215
Thinking & Learning “Four Personality Styles”
Models
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Bandler & Grinder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuro-Linguistic |
|
Visual |
Kinesthetic |
|
Digital |
Auditory |
|||||||
Programming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernice McCarthy |
Imaginative |
Dynamic |
Analytic |
Common Sense |
|||||||||
About Learning |
Learning |
Learning |
Learning |
Learning |
|||||||||
Honey & Mumford |
Pragmatist |
Activist |
Theorist |
Reflector |
|||||||||
Learning Styles |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Keith Golay |
Conceptual - |
Actual - |
Actual - |
Conceptual - |
|||||||||
Learning Types |
Specific |
Spontaneous |
Routine |
|
Global |
||||||||
David Kolb |
Converging |
Diverging |
Assimilating |
Accommodating |
|||||||||
Learning Styles |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Janet Rae-Dupree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Styles |
Procedurally |
Innovatively |
Analytically |
Relationally |
|||||||||
(NY
Times 5/4/08) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony
Gregorc |
Abstract – |
Abstract - |
Concrete - |
Concrete - |
|||||||||
Thinking Styles |
Sequential |
Random |
Sequential |
Random |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Explore” |
Ideas & Things |
People & Ideas |
Data & Things |
People & Data |
|||||||||
Standards |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Achievement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orientation |
Prophetic |
Intuitive |
Visionary |
Feeling |
|||||||||
Counseling |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Katherine Benziger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thinking
Styles |
Frontal Left |
Basal Left |
Basal Right |
Frontal Right |
|||||||||
Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conscious |
Unconscious |
Unconscious |
Conscious |
Conscious |
|||||||||
Competence |
|||||||||||||
Competence |
Incompetence |
Competence |
Incompetence |
||||||||||
Learning Matrix |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
Gordon |
Unconsciously |
Unconsciously |
Consciously |
Consciously |
|||||||||
Learning Stages |
|
Skilled |
Unskilled |
|
Skilled |
Unskilled |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken
Wilber |
Intersubjective |
Interobjective |
Subjective |
Objective |
|||||||||
4 Quadrants Model |
Cultural |
|
Social |
Introspective |
Behavioral |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Barrett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision
& Mission |
Internal Vision |
External Vision |
Internal Mission |
External Mission |
|||||||||
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotional |
|
Self- |
Social- |
|
Self- |
Social- |
|||||||
Intelligence 2.0 |
Awareness |
Awareness |
Management |
Management |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotional |
Affirmative |
Intercultural |
|
Self |
|
Social |
|||||||
Intelligence
and |
|
|
|||||||||||
Introspection |
Literacy |
Governance |
Architecting |
||||||||||
Diversity Institute |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
Animal “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
||
Exekiel
– 590 BC |
|
Lion |
|
Eagle |
|
Ox |
|
Man |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
Combs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Animal |
|
Lion |
Monkey |
|
Owl |
|
Koala |
|||||
Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Smalley |
|
Lion |
|
Otter |
|
Beaver |
Golden Retriever |
|||||
Four Personalities |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Horrell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
Than |
|
Lion |
|
Fox |
|
Koala |
Porpoise |
|||||
Words |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Victor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hansen |
|
Owls |
|
Hares |
Turtles |
Squirrels |
||||||
The One
Minute |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millionaire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack
Falt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciating |
|
Owl |
|
Fox |
|
Beaver |
Dolphin |
|||||
Differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda
Berens |
|
Owl |
|
Fox |
|
Beaver |
Dolphin/Unicorn |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niednagel, 1992 |
|
Owl |
Humming Bird |
|
Bee |
|
Stork |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Animal |
|
Bear |
Monkey |
|
Beaver |
Dolphin |
||||||
System |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nash – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Plains |
|
Bear |
|
Eagle |
Buffalo |
|
Mouse |
|||||
Indians |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spirit Totems |
Turkey Vulture |
|
Eagle |
Groundhog |
|
Fox |
||||||
Animal Speak |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosner/Campbell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recession-Time |
Buzzard |
|
Eagle |
Ostrich |
Chicken-Little |
|||||||
Personalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patty
Bogan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing
Your |
|
Shark |
Dolphin |
Gray Whale |
Jellyfish |
|||||||
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sun
Bear |
Thunderbird- |
Butterfly-Clan |
Turtle-Clan |
Frog-Clan |
||||||||
Medicine Wheel |
|
Clan |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
Color “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Taylor
Hartman – |
Red-Power |
Yellow-Fun |
White-Peace |
Blue-Intimacy |
|||||||||
The Color Code |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Matrixx |
|
Gold |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
System |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don
Lowry – |
|
Gold |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
Responsible – |
Spontaneous – |
Conceptual – |
Compassionate – |
||||||||||
True Colors |
|||||||||||||
Be Prepared |
Seize the Day |
Knowledge |
|
I Care |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Career
Lifeskills – |
|
Gold - |
Orange - |
Green - |
|
Blue - |
|||||||
Personality |
|
|
|||||||||||
Organized |
Resourceful |
Inquiring |
Authentic |
||||||||||
Dimensions |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Falt –
Appreciating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences Thru |
|
Gold |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
Colors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Colors People |
|
Gold |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
Four
Ways System |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Colors |
|
Gold |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Alessendra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Platinum |
|
Green |
|
Red |
|
Yellow |
|
Blue |
|||||
Rule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Max
Luscher – |
|
Red |
|
Blue |
|
Green |
|
Yellow |
|||||
4 Color Person |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Clark – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Magic of |
|
Red |
|
Blue |
|
Green |
|
Yellow |
|||||
Colors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carol
Ritberger – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What
Color is |
|
Red |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Yellow |
||||||
Your Personality? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Color
Your World |
|
Red |
Orange |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Birkmann |
|
Red |
|
Yellow |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
|||||
Method |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak
Performance |
|
Red |
|
Yellow |
|
Green |
|
Blue |
|||||
Systems,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicine
Wheel |
Blue or Black |
|
Yellow |
|
White |
|
Red |
||||||
(several
sources) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218
Adversarial “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
James R. Quinn The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Fear-Based |
|
Fight |
|
Flight |
|
Freeze |
Facade |
||||||
Reactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin Rinaldi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four
Stress |
|
Fight |
|
Flight |
|
Freeze |
Submission |
||||||
Responses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenban/Seligman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personality |
Paranoid |
Histrionic |
Avoidant |
Dependent |
|||||||||
Disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Lefton |
Dominant- |
Dominant- |
Submissive- |
Submissive- |
|||||||||
Effective |
|||||||||||||
Hostile |
|
Warm |
Hostile |
|
Warm |
||||||||
Motivation |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
James Redfield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Celestine |
Intimidator |
Interrogator |
|
Aloof |
Poor Me |
||||||||
Prophesy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia
Satir |
Blamer |
Distracter |
Computer |
Placater |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernst Kretschmer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four |
Hyperesthetic |
Hypomanic |
Melancholic |
Anesthetic |
|||||||||
Temperaments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pioneer
Stereo |
|
Abort |
|
Distort |
|
Delay |
Distrust |
||||||
Extreme Sports |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay Hall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflict |
Win-Lose |
Lose-Leave |
Yield-Lose |
Synergistic |
|||||||||
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bartholomew |
Dismissing |
Insecure |
Pre-Occupied |
Fearful |
|||||||||
Attachment Styles |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Quinn |
Focused
on |
Focused
on |
Focused
on a |
Focused
on |
|||||||||
Smart-Phone |
|||||||||||||
Multi-Tasks |
Multi-Persons |
Another
Task |
Another-Person |
||||||||||
Disruptors |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
James R. Quinn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer-Abusers |
Destroyers |
Humiliators |
Ignorers |
Excluders |
|||||||||
& Bullies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
T. Simpson |
|
Power |
Integration |
|
Denial |
Suppression |
|||||||
Conflict Styles |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Strategies |
|
Power |
Recognition |
Respect |
Approval |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cosmopolitan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Guys You |
Smooth Operator |
Adrenaline Junkie |
Work-A-Holic |
Nice Guy |
|||||||||
Shouldn’t
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas/Kilmann |
Competing |
Collaborating |
Avoiding |
Accommodating |
|||||||||
Conflict Mode |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219
Still More “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Stephen
Covey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“The Four |
Values & |
|
|
|
Reading & |
|
|
|
|||||
Dimensions of |
Stress Reduction |
Service & Empathy |
|||||||||||
Commitment |
Visualizing |
||||||||||||
Renewal” … The 7 |
Physical |
Emotional |
|||||||||||
Spiritual |
Mental |
||||||||||||
Habits of Highly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effective People |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
H. Quinn |
Spiritual |
Physical |
|
Mental |
Emotional |
||||||||
LifeStream |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander Everett |
Spiritual |
Physical |
Mental |
Emotional |
|||||||||
Mind Dynamics |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connie
Chandler |
Spiritual |
Physical |
Intellectual |
Emotional |
|||||||||
Paths of Mastery |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
David Reed |
Ethereal |
Material |
Conceptual |
Emotional |
|||||||||
Holistic Systems |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Janes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introcosm |
Agency |
Physical Unity |
Self History |
Emotions |
|||||||||
Core/Self |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anita
Renfroe |
Purse – |
Purse – |
Purse – |
Purse – |
|||||||||
Purse-sonalities |
Tiny Toter |
More is Better |
Monogamous |
Schizophrenic |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florence
Littauer |
Choleric |
Sanguine |
Melancholic |
Phlegmatic |
|||||||||
Personality Plus |
(Powerful) |
(Popular) |
(Perfect) |
(Peaceful) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herb
Shephard |
Perspective |
|
Tone |
Autonomy |
Connectedness |
||||||||
Philosopher |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cindy Ashton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What
Type of |
Receiver |
Reciprocator |
Diminisher |
Justifier |
|||||||||
Receiver
Are |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
You? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Quinn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GET
OVER |
|
“Z” |
|
Circle |
Triangle |
Square |
|||||||
YOURSELF |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Keynote
Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
Even More “Four Personality Styles” Models
Typical |
Style 1 |
|
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
C. S.
Lewis |
Charity |
|
Eros |
Friendship |
Affection |
||||||||
The Four Loves |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brewer/Ainsworth/Wynne |
|
Active |
Persuasive |
Precise |
Willing |
||||||||
Power Management |
Competitive |
Interactive |
Systematic |
|
Steady |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dranitsaris |
Traditionalists |
Catalysts |
Visionaries |
Pragmatists |
|||||||||
Sage
Personality Profile |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Me |
Concluder |
Interactor |
Analyzer |
Synthesizer |
|||||||||
Personality
Types |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ned Herman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Whole Brain |
Organize |
Strategize |
Analyze |
Personalize |
|||||||||
Business Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warren Berger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Four Phases of Design |
Question |
Connect |
Commit |
|
Care |
||||||||
Thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wriths/Bowman-Kruhm |
Organizing & |
Acting & |
Understanding & |
Caring & |
|||||||||
Are You My Type? |
Belonging |
Impacting |
Knowing |
Questioning |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wriths/Bowman-Kruhm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Need to Get Along With |
Members |
|
Actors |
Thinkers |
Friends |
||||||||
Different Types of People |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan
Pease Questions are |
Key #4 |
Key #3 |
Key #2 |
Key #1 |
|||||||||
|
Get a |
Press the Hot |
Find the Hot |
||||||||||
the Answers |
|
Melt the Ice |
|||||||||||
Commitment |
|
Button |
|
Button |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Hersey
& Blanchard |
|
Telling |
Selling |
Delegating |
Participating |
||||||||
Situational Leadership |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caliper
Corporation |
Problem |
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
|
|||||
Solving & |
|
|
|
Organization & |
|
|
|
||||||
Profile
Personality |
Persuasive |
Inter-Personal |
|||||||||||
Decision |
|
Time |
|||||||||||
Assessment Tool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Making |
|
|
|
Management |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sean
Covey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Habits of Highly |
Bananas |
Oranges |
Melons |
|
Grapes |
||||||||
Effective Teens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
R. Quinn |
|
Ethics |
Enthusiasm |
Evaluation |
Empathy |
||||||||
The Love-Based Leader |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
Lets have some fun. What do you think of these?
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
|
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Disneyland
& |
Adventureland |
Fantasyland |
Tomorrowland |
Main Street USA |
|||||||||
Disney
World |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biblical
Figures |
Solomon |
|
David |
Abraham |
|
Moses |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Beatles |
John Lennon |
Paul McCartney |
George Harrison |
Ringo Starr |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Monkees |
Mike Nesmith |
Micky Dolenz |
Peter Tork |
Davy Jones |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
USA |
Germany |
|
Russia |
||||||
Countries |
|
China |
|
France |
|
Egypt |
New Zealand |
||||||
|
England |
Australia |
Switzerland |
Canada |
|||||||||
Leadership
Model |
Queen Elizabeth |
P.T. Barnum |
Albert Einstein |
Mahatma Gandhi |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger
Hamilton |
Martha Stewart |
Donald Trump |
Sam Walton |
Warren Buffett |
|||||||||
The
Billionaires |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Washington |
John Kennedy |
Abraham Lincoln |
Gerald Ford |
|||||||||
U.S. Presidents |
Franklin Roosevelt |
Ronald Reagan |
Richard Nixon |
Jimmy Carter |
|||||||||
|
Lyndon Johnson |
William Clinton |
George H.W. Bush |
George W. Bush |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
Presidential |
Hillary Clinton |
Barack Obama |
Mitt Romney |
John McCain |
|||||||||
Candidates |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
How About These TV Shows?
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
I Love
Lucy |
Ricky Ricardo |
Lucy Ricardo |
Ethel Mertz |
Fred Mertz |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The |
Alice Camden – |
Ralph Camden – |
Tricia Norton – |
Ed Norton – |
|||||||||
Audrey |
|||||||||||||
Honeymooners |
Jackie Gleason |
Joyce Randolph |
Art Carney |
||||||||||
Meadows |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.A.S.H. |
Margaret |
Hawkeye Pierce |
Trapper John |
Frank Burns |
|||||||||
Houlihan |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnum
PI |
Higgins |
Thomas Magnum |
|
A.J. |
|
Rick |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little
House |
Michael Landon |
Melissa Gilbert |
Melissa Sue |
Karen Grassle |
|||||||||
on the
Prairie |
Anderson |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonanza |
|
Ben |
Little Joe |
|
Adam |
|
Hoss |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All In
The Family |
|
Archie |
|
Gloria |
Michael |
|
Edith |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Beverly |
Granny - |
Jethro Bodine |
Jed Clampett |
Elly May Clampett |
|||||||||
Hillbillies |
Daisy Moses |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary
Tyler Moore |
Mr. Grant |
|
Ted |
Murray |
|
Mary |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frasier |
Martin Crane |
Frasier Crane |
Niles Crane |
Daphne Moon |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Happy
Days |
The Fonz |
Ralph Malph |
|
Potsie |
Richie Cunningham |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seinfeld |
|
Elaine |
Kramer |
|
Jerry |
George |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex in
the City |
Miranda |
Samantha |
Charlotte |
|
Carrie |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desperate |
Lynette |
Gabrielle |
|
Bree |
|
Susan |
|||||||
Housewives |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
Or These Animations?
Typical |
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
||
The
Flintstones |
Wilma Flintstone |
Fred Flintstone |
Betty Rubble |
Barney Rubble |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Jetsons |
|
Jane |
|
Judy |
|
Elroy |
George |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walt
Disney |
Donald Duck |
|
Goofy |
Scrooge McDuck |
Mickey Mouse |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winnie
The Pooh |
|
Rabbit |
|
Tigger |
|
Eeyore |
|
Pooh |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts |
|
Lucy |
Peppermint Patty |
|
Linus |
Charlie Brown |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looney
Toons |
Daffy Duck |
Bugs Bunny |
Wiley Coyote |
Elmer Fudd |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim
Henson |
Miss Piggy |
Kermit The Frog |
The Count |
|
Elmo |
|||||||
The Muppets |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alice
in |
Queen of Hearts |
Mad Hatter |
Caterpillar |
|
Alice |
|||||||
Wonderland |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Super
Heroes |
Wonder Woman |
Superman |
Batman |
Spiderman |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Incredibles |
Elastigirl |
|
Dash |
|
Violet |
Mr. Incredible |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky
& |
Boris Badinoff |
|
Rocky |
Natasha |
Bullwinkle |
|||||||
Bullwinkle |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
Park |
Eric Cartman |
Kyle Brofloski |
|
Kenny |
Stan Marsh |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Simpson’s |
|
Bart |
|
Homer |
|
Lisa |
|
Marge |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
Or These Movies?
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
|
Style 4 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
|||
Beverly
Hills Cop |
Lt. Bogomil |
Dt. Axel Foley |
Dt. Taggart |
Dt. Rosewood |
|||||||||
Ronny Cox |
Eddie Murphy |
John Ashton |
Judge Reinhold |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Dream Team |
|
Jack – |
|
Billy – |
Henry – |
Albert – |
|||||||
Peter Boyle |
Michael Keaton |
Christopher Lloyd |
Stephen Furst |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben Grimm |
Johnny Storm |
Reed Richards |
Sue Storm/ |
|||||||||
Fantastic Four |
Richards Invisible |
||||||||||||
The Thing |
The Human Torch |
Mr.Fantastic |
|||||||||||
|
Girl/Woman |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Ferris
Bueller’s |
Jeanie Bueller |
Ferris Bueller |
Cameron Frye |
Sloane Peterson |
|||||||||
Matthew |
|||||||||||||
Day Off |
Jennifer Grey |
Alan Ruck |
Mia Sara |
||||||||||
Broderick |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ghostbusters |
Dana Barrett |
Peter Venkman |
Egon Spengler |
Ray Stantz |
|||||||||
Sigourney Weaver |
Bill Murray |
Harold Ramis |
Dan Aykroyd |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hermione Granger |
Harry Potter |
Dumbledore – |
Ron Weasley |
|||||||||
Harry Potter |
Richard Harris & |
||||||||||||
Emma Watson |
Daniel Radcliffe |
Rupert Grint |
|||||||||||
|
Michael Gambon |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Lion, |
|
Peter – |
|
Lucy – |
Susan – |
Edmund – |
|||||||
the Witch, and |
|
|
|||||||||||
William Moeley |
Georgie Henley |
Anna Popplewell |
Skandar Keynes |
||||||||||
the
Wardrobe |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pirates
of the |
Barbossa – |
Jack Sparrow |
Will Turner |
Elizabeth Swann |
|||||||||
Caribbean |
Geoffey Rush |
Johnny Depp |
Orlando Bloom |
Keira Knightley |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky |
Rocky Balboa |
Apollo Creed |
Mickey Goldmill |
Adrian Pennino |
|||||||||
Sylvester Stallone |
Carl Weathers |
Burgess Meredith |
Talia Shire |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silverado |
Emmett – |
|
Jake – |
Mal Jonson – |
Paden – |
||||||||
Scott Glenn |
Kevin Costner |
Danny Glover |
Kevin Kline |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stand
By Me |
Chris – |
Teddy – |
Gordie – |
|
Vern – |
||||||||
River Phoenix |
Corey Feldman |
Wil Wheaton |
Jery O’Connell |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Star
Wars |
Princess Leia |
Han Solo |
Obi-Wan Kenobi |
Luke Skywalker |
|||||||||
Carrie Fisher |
Harrison Ford |
Alec Guinness |
Mark Hamill |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Gun |
Charlie – |
Maverick – |
Iceman – |
Goose – |
|||||||||
Kelly McGillis |
Tom Cruise |
Val Kilmer |
Anthony Edwards |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Wizard of Oz |
Scarecrow – |
Cowardly Lion – |
Dorothy – |
Tin Man – |
|||||||||
Ray Bolger |
Bert Lahr |
Judy Garland |
Jack Haley |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
And For All You “Trekkers” *
Typical |
|
Style 1 |
Style 2 |
|
Style 3 |
Style 4 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orientation |
Results |
Relationships |
|
Tasks |
Feelings & |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotions |
||
Star
Trek |
James T. Kirk |
|
Scotty |
|
Spock |
Dr. Leonard McCoy |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Next |
Jean-Luc Picard |
William T. Riker |
|
Data |
Deanna Troi |
|||||||
Generation |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deep
Space Nine |
Benjamin Sisko |
|
Quark |
|
Odo |
Dr. Julian Bashir |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyager |
Kathryn Janeway |
|
Neelix |
|
Tuvok |
B’Elanna Torres |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise |
Jonathan Archer |
Charles Tucker |
|
T’Pol |
Dr. Phlox |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
The correct term for zealous Star
Trek fans is “Trekkers” and not “Trekkies,” according to Leonard Nimoy (Mr.
Spock of Star Trek).
226
WORLDWIDE
PRAISE
“The Love-Based Leader is an
extraordinary manual for creating results by overcoming negativity and
fear-based reactions. I have found the concepts and techniques to be effective
across cultural boundaries and personal backgrounds. It will change how
organizations conduct their affairs.”
John Nemanic –
Ontario, CANADA
Chairman/Founder: GeeksForLess.com, Hostopia.com, and Tucows.com
“There
are few short cuts to a truly rewarding life. Nevertheless, The Love-Based Leader offers a leg up
to those seeking more successful personal and professional relationships.”
Robert H. Sanders –
Illinois, USA
Public Relations – Chicago Tribune, WTTW, Playboy, TV Guide
“The Love-Based Leader has enhanced our
salespeople’s understanding of our client’s needs and motivations, particularly
in stressful situations. I can directly attribute many of our successes to
Quinn’s tools and strategies.”
Michael Pinkney – NEW
ZEALAND
Director, ReMax North Shore
“Since I
started using the tools from The
Love-Based Leader, my employees, partners, and customers regularly ask me
what’s the secret of my effectiveness and productivity. The answer: I base my
leadership style on the principles in this book every day, both at work and at
home.”
Fred Dewey - California & New York, USA CEO, Kachingle.com
“The Love-Based Leader is brilliant. I’d
fallen into a rut. You have given me the tools to break out of old patterns. My
hat’s off to you.”
Rena Gaile –
Ontario, CANADA
1997 runner-up to Shania Twain for, "Canadian Female Artist of the
Year"
“I’ve
noticed immediate effects with the way our managers are relating to others.
They’ve gained the ability to step back from negative reactions and refocus on
their initial objectives. The Love-Based
Leader workshop is impressive.”
Michael Mahanger – New
York, USA
Director, Microtel Corporation
“The Love-Based Leader gets people to
look at themselves in an honest and non-judgmental way. Instead of justifying
or denying ineffective behaviors, readers will gain the ability to create
desired results in their lives.”
Jim Morgan –
Ontario, CANADA
Emmy
Award Winning TV Theme Producer & Writer
Care Bears, Beetlejuice, and The Adventures of Tin Tin
“The Love-Based Leader has
helped me to heal and expand my personal relationships. With it, I have also
become a more effective lobbyist, director, parent, and restaurant manager. It
is a key to creating life successes.”
227
Nan Hanna-Paquin – New
York, USA
Professional Lobbyist, Partner H/P Associates
“The beauty of The
Love-Based Leader is that this powerful book can be picked up and read
at any point, as a constant reference source.”
Dustin Hotrum –
Ontario, CANADA
CEO, H.M.T Sales Tax Consultants Inc.
“This book is a primer of the
basics for happiness. The concepts in The Love-Based Leader are presented
simply, with humor and from the heart. A winning combination.”
Phyllis Campagna – Illinois, USA Business
Coach, XSEL Performance Strategies
PART ONE: “I started reading The
Love-Based Leader, but made the mistake of telling my husband, Morgan,
about your wonderful book. I haven’t seen it since. I can’t wait to get it
back.”
Joanne Cotten –
Illinois, USA
PART TWO: “I have been devouring The
Love-Based Leader. Having read Carnegie’s “How to Win Friends &
Influence People”, Waitley’s “The Psychology of Winning”, Burg’s “Winning
Without Intimidation”, Covey’s “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People”, and
Littauer’s “Personality Plus”, I’ve found this book better at putting it all
together in one source. It’s great.” Morgan Cotten – Illinois, USA
Deputy Director of Transportation for DuPage County
“The Love-Based Leader is
an incredible tool for business and personal life. This book has more
immediately applicable lessons and techniques than all the leadership books I
have read put together. This is a great book.”
J. André Kennedy – Ontario, CANADA President, Golf To The Nth Degree Inc.
“The Love-Based Leader
provides immediate insight building relationships in the family and workplace.
You will learn ideas you can put into practice the very day you begin reading
this practical and delightful book.”
Cindy Clark Hoy –
California, USA
Teacher (Redondo Union High School), Certificated Alcohol & Drug
Counselor
“The Love-Based Leader is
a powerfully insightful and often humorous roadmap of how to control myself
when I want different outcomes.”
Ross Stokes – NEW
ZEALAND
CEO, IP Marketing Group Ltd.
228
“Thank you for illuminating human
behavior in a way that is fun to read and simple to follow. It just plain makes
sense. The Love-Based Leader gives readers the tools to change their
reactive patterns to become happier and more successful. I am personally
indebted to you for making my journey easier.”
Dr. Ross S. Royster –
Wisconsin, USA
34 years as a practicing Chiropractor
“My initial perusal turned into a
must-read-sit-down. The Love-Based Leader goes to the heart and soul of successful
communications. I am recommending this amazing book to fellow lawyers and my
hospital clients.”
Gail Allyn Landau, Esq. –
California, USA
Medical Malpractice Defense Attorney and Risk Management Consultant
“The Love-Based Leader
provides practical and useful information in a clear format, permitting
tangible and immediate benefits. The combination of concise text and evocative
imagery is very effective.”
David Bryan –
Ontario, CANADA
Registered Trade Mark Agent and Partner, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
“The Love-Based Leader has
enhanced our salespeople’s understanding of our client’s needs and motivations,
particularly in stressful situations. I can directly attribute many of our
successes to Quinn’s tools and strategies.”
Chef Dana Gumataotao – Hawaii, USA
President,
Okey Dokey Productions, Inc.
Host, The Sugar Cane Shack – Hawaii’s new and exciting cooking show!
“I have read over one hundred
self-help books and have found the most valuable lessons for success in The
Love-Based Leader. This is a great book.”
Philip Barry Greig –
Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
“The Love-Based Leader is
fabulous! James Roswell Quinn has great insight into what is needed so badly in
today’s society.”
Elizabeth Bennett, M.Ed –
California, USA
Author, Peer Abuse Know More:
Bullying From a Psychological Perspective
“The Love-Based Leader has
the power to change lives for the better. This is a valuable book.”
Jillian Jeffery –
Ontario, CANADA
Associate Editor, RENOVATION & DÉCOR Magazine
“The Love-Based Leader allows the reader to see how they can respond to negativity in a way that all parties benefit. Quinn’s
models and examples guide the reader to an understanding of how love-based
choices can make our lives work so much better.”
Steve Aman -- New York, USA
President, Sanctuary at Crowfield Farm
229
“The Love-Based Leader is
a wonderful tool for my personal and professional growth. Every corporation and
household should own a copy of this masterpiece.”
Nancy May –
Illinois, USA
Teacher, “Yoga from the Heart”
“The Love-Based Leader is
without question, one of the most remarkable and captivating books I have ever
read. It should be required reading.”
Emily Cieslinski – Ontario, CANADA MLM & Direct Distribution
Marketing Expert
“The Love-Based Leader is
packed with advice on how to deal with others by managing your own reactions.
More importantly, the advice works. The way this book is organized makes it
easy to use as a reference.”
Rudy Bazelmans – New Hampshire, USA Director of Professional
Services, Phonetic Systems
“This important work is practical and enduring. The
Love-Based Leader is relevant to my life. The exercises helped me to
put the lessons into practice.” Chris J. Cuciurean –
Ontario, CANADA
Business Coach and President, LifeLeaders
“I have had immediate results
from The
Love-Based Leader. Simple things, like getting my teenage son to make
his bed, certainly please me. However, that I have stopped my old and tiresome
complaining routine has made me even happier. This is an outstanding result for
me. Awesome!”
Geoff Woods –
AUSTRALIA
“The bottom line of The
Love-Based Leader is that the principles in work. It is amazing the
influence you can have when you are in control of yourself.”
Tom Dusmet –
Ontario, CANADA
Investment Advisor with a Major Bank Owned Brokerage Firm
“During the last 20 years I have
spent thousands of dollars on Self-Help, Self-Improvement, and Motivational
Lectures, CD’s, Tapes, Videos, and Seminars. I have made in-depth studies of
Quantum Physics, the Law of Attraction, and Religion. However it was not until
I read The Love Based Leader that it all came together. I learned more
from your words than all of it. I will never be able to thank you enough. I
needed the healing.”
Patricia Gaines –
California, USA
Multi Level Marketing Expert
“The Love-Based Leader inspires me to
never stay stuck, and to continue on to my next opportunity/experience in life.
Debbie Bohunicky –
Ontario, CANADA
Personal Development Coach/Bereavement Facilitator, Niagara Workshops
230
“I have worked with Quinn since 1978. After all
these years, it’s a privilege to see him sharing himself with the world. James
Roswell Quinn is a gifted teacher.”
Alexander Everett – Oregon,
USA
“The
Father of the Human Potential Movement”
Founder,
Pendragon School at Bexhill-on-Sea, Sussex, England, 1950 Founder, Shiplake
College at Henley-on-Thames, Oxford, England, 1953 Founder, Fort Worth Country
Day School, 1963
Creator
and teacher, Mind Dynamics (self-improvement seminar), 1968
Subject
of the book, The Power of Alpha Thinking, Jess Stearn, 1969
Creator
and teacher, Inward Bound (spiritual seminar), 1973
Creator
and teacher, Love, Life & Light (spiritual retreat & seminar), 1988
Subject of the book, Inward Bound, Billie Sargent
Hatchell, 1991
Author, The Genius Within You (audio
program), Nightingale-Conant, 1991
Author, Inner Wealth, (audio
program), Nightingale-Conant, 1992 Author, Inward Bound – Living Life From The Inside
Out, 1998 Author, Cosmic Consciousness (CD ROM
AudioBook), 2001
Alexander is also known as “The Teacher of Teachers”
Russell
Bishop (Insight Seminars)
Stuart
Emery (Actualizations)
Werner
Erhardt (“est” and Landmark Forum)
John
Hanley (Lifespring)
Howard
Nease (Personal Dynamics)
James
& Janet Quinn (LifeStream)
Dr. O. Carl Simonton (The Simonton Cancer Center)
Randy
Revell (Context Trainings)
Robert
White (Life Dynamics and ARC)
Tom &
Jane Willhite (PSI World)
231
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alessandra, Tony & Cathcart, Jim, Relationship Strategies, Nightingale-Conant Ansari, Mahfooz, Managing People at Work: Leadership Styles
and Influence
Strategies, Sage Publications, 1991
Arrien,
Angeles, The Four Fold Way, Harper
San Francisco, 1993
Atkins, Stuart, The Name of Your Game: Four Game Plans for
Success, Ellis & Stewart, 1982
Bamborough, J.B.; Dodsworth,
Martin; & Burton, Robert; Anatomy of
Melancholy (Vol 6), Clarendon Press,
2001
Baron,
Renee, What Type Am I: Discover Who You
Really Are, Penguin, 1998
Bartholomew, Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective. Journal of Social
& Personal Relationships, 1990
Batra, Dr. Ravi, The Great
Depression of 1990, Simon and Schuster, 1987 Berens, Linda V., Understanding Yourself and Others, An
Introduction to
Temperament, Telos Publications, 2000
Benson, Herbert, The Relaxation Response, HarperCollins Publishers, 2000 Bolton,
Robert & Dorothy, G., Social
Style/Management Style, AMACOM, 1984 Brewer, Ainsworth, & Wynne, G. E., Power Management, Prentice-Hall,
1984 Bristol, Claude, The Magic of
Believing, Pocket Books, 1994
Buscalia, Leo, Love,
Ballantine Books, 1996 Clark, Jerry, The
Magic of Colors, Club Rhino, Inc.
Combs, Jeffrey, The
Animal Factor, Golden Mastermind Seminars, Inc. Covey, Stephen, 7 Habits of Highly Effective People,
Simon & Schuster 1990 Davidson, Jacqueline, Develop Your Best Self, Toastmaster Magazine, May 2004 De Ville,
Jard, Nice Guys Finish First, William
Morrow, 1979
Dryden, Gordon & Vos, Jeannette, The Learning Revolution, Jalmar Press,
1994 Everett, Alexander, Inward Bound,
Living Life From The Inside Out,
Bookpartners Inc, 1998
Fisher & Muller, Four
Dimensional Leadership, Prentice Hall, 2004 Fuller, R. Buckminster, Critical Path, St. Martin’s Press, 2002
Ganza, Ann, Journey of Hope, Remembering Mother Teresa’s Spirit, Agnel
Publishing, 2001
Gray, Dr John, Men Are From Mars Women Are From Venus,
Harper Collins, 1993
Geier, John G., (D.I.S.C.)
Personal Profile System, Performax Systems, 1977 Hansen, Mark Victor, The One Minute Millionaire, Harmony
Books, 2002 Harris, Thomas A., MD, I’m OK
– You’re OK, Galahad, 2004 (revised) Hartman, Taylor, PhD, The Color Code, Scribner, 1987 Hawkins,
David R., Power vs. Force, Hay House,
2002
Herrmann,
Ned, The Creative Brain, Brain Books,
1991
Herrmann,
Ned, The Whole Brain Business Book,
McGraw-Hill, 1996
Hill,
Napoleon, Think and Grow Rich,
Fawcett Books, 1990
Hill, Richard, The Best of Organization Development,
American Society for Training Development, 1988
Horell, Edward, More Than Words,
eBook
232
Hunsaker, Phillip L., The Art of Managing People, Prentice Hall, 1980 Hurley, Joanna, Mother Teresa, Courage Books, 1997
Jampolski, Jerry, Love is Letting Go of
Fear, Celestial Arts, 1988
Jaynes, J., The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind,
Houghton Mifflin, 1977
Johnson, Spencer, M.D., Who Moved
My Cheese?, J.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1998 Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types (Collected Works of C.G.
Jung Vol.6),
Princeton University Press, 1976
Keirsey, David, Please Understand Me. Character &
Temperament Types, Prometheus, 1984
Lefton, Robert E., Effective Motivation Through Performance
Appraisal, Wiley & Sons, 1977
LeTellier, John, Quantum Learning, Dell Publishing, 1992 Lewis, C.S., The Four Loves, Harvest Books, 1971
Ley, D. Forbes, The
Best Seller, Sales Success Press, 1984 Littauer, Florence, PERSONALITY PLUS, Revell Publishers,
1992 Lovas, Michael, Face Values
Luft, Joseph, Of
Human Interaction, Palo Alto, CA. National Press, 1969 Luscher, Dr. Max, The 4 Color Person, Simon &
Schuster, 1979 Maltz, Maxwell, Psychocybernetics,
Pocket Books, 1989
Marston, William M., Emotions of
Normal People, Personna Press, 1979 Maslow, Abraham, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, Viking Press, 1971 Merrill,
David, & Reid, Roger, Personal Styles
& Effective Performance, Saint
Lucie, 1981
Miscisin, Mary, Showing Our True
Colors, True Colors, Inc, 2001 Montgomery, Richard, People Patterns: A Modern Guide to the Four
Temperaments
Moore, Robert & Gillette,
Douglas, Rediscovering the Archetypes of
the Mature Masculine,
HarperCollins, 1990
Myers, Peter B. & Isabel
Briggs, Gifts Differing: Understanding
Personality, Consulting Psychologists
Press, 1997
New
International Version, Holy Bible,
International Bible Society, 1984
Pease, Allan, Questions
are the Answers, Pease Training International Ltd., 2000 Redfield, James, The Celestine Prophecy, Warner Books,
1993
Rowling, JK, Harry
Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Arthur Levine Books, 1997 Ruiz, Don
Miguel, The Four Agreements,
Amber-Publishing, 1997 Saltzman, David, The
Jester Has Lost His Jingle, Jester Co. Inc., 1995 Seligman, Walker, &
Rosenhan, Abnormal Psychology, 4th
Edition, W.W.
Norton & Co, 2000
Sieden,
Steven, Buckminster Fuller’s Universe:
His Life and Times, Perseus,
2000
Sperry,
Len, Effective Leadership, Psychology
Press, 2002
Sun Bear,
Medicine Wheel, Earth Astrology,
Fireside, 1980
Stearn, Jess, The
Power of Alpha Thinking, New American Library, 1989 Teresa, Mother, A Simple Path, Ballantine Books, 1995
Wilson Learning Corporation, Social
Styles Sales Strategies, 1977
233
A Request For Stories of Love-Based Leadership
We are collecting stories of
Love-Based Leadership for a future publication. Whether you have created a
love-based solution to a negative circumstance or witnessed one, please send us
the details. These stories can be personal, relationship, family, professional,
community, national, or global in nature.
Please send your stories to:
InterPersonal Incorporated
James
Roswell Quinn
1090
Winborne Road
Davis, IL
61019-9756
U.S.A.
Or email
your stories to:
By
submitting your stories of Love-Based Leadership, you will help
others to grow as Love-Based Leaders. Stories, once submitted, become the
property of InterPersonal Incorporated and cannot be returned. If multiple
entries are received for the same event, the entry with earliest email date or
postmark will be used.
234
Contact The Author
[ ] YES I
would like James Roswell Quinn to
contact me.
I understand that I am under no obligation, and all
information that I share is confidential.
I am primarily interested in: |
|
|
|
||
[ |
] |
Corporate Consulting |
[ |
] |
Personal Success Coaching |
[ |
] |
Keynote Address |
[ |
] |
Professional Success Coaching |
[ |
] |
Leadership Retreat |
[ |
] |
Sales/Management Workshop |
[ |
] Bulk Purchases of Books & CDs |
[ |
] The Wave (peer-abuse program) |
||
[ |
] Other
_____________________________________________________ |
||||
My key frustrations or needs
are: |
|
|
|
||
[ |
] |
Personal Health |
[ |
] |
Personal Relationships |
[ |
] |
Personal Finance |
[ |
] |
Self-Worth and/or Self-Esteem |
[ |
] |
Business Health |
[ |
] |
Business Relationships |
[ |
] Creating Teamwork |
[ |
] Reducing Employee Turnover |
||
[ |
] |
Developing a Organizational Culture of
Problem-Solving by Consensus |
|||
[ |
] |
Involving students, teachers, parents &
administration in an effective, |
|||
|
|
long-term, Peer-Abuse (anti-bullying) program. |
|||
[ |
] Other
_____________________________________________________ |
My Name: _______________________________________________________
Business Name: ___________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________________________
City: ____________________________________________________________
State: __________ Country ______________ Postal/Zip ___________________
Phone: ______________________ email: ______________________________
Type of Business/Products/Services: ___________________________________
Years in Business: ______________ # Employees: _____________
# of Locations: ______________ # Owners/Partners: _____________
Send this completed page to: Quinn@LoveBasedLeader.com ... or to
InterPersonal Incorporated - 1090
Winborne Rd, Davis, IL 61019-9756
Or you
can phone Quinn at his Skype account: JamesRQuinn
235
8-CD
Personal Audio Seminar
- Change Can Be Fun -
If you have ever considered
yourself to be your own worst enemy, and are ready to get out of your own way,
then you will LOVE this acclaimed 8-CD Personal Audio Seminar.
Take advantage of Quinn’s unparalleled experience
of three decades
of facilitating over 1,500 personal growth
seminars,
and coaching dozens of millionaires, worldwide.
GET OVER YOURSELF
ONLY $499.95 USD
You have nothing to lose, and everything to gain,
as these CDs come with a 90-Day Unconditional
Guarantee!
This is an AMAZING VALUE. You
would have to attend all 6 of Quinn’s seminars, and his keynote address, to get
all of these tools and concepts!
(Total VALUE: $5,999.95)
To order your copy, go to “The Quinn Store” link at:
... and check out Quinn’s outrageous:
GET OVER YOURSELF STORE
237